Jack Smith Setting 'Extraordinarily Dangerous' Precedent by Piercing Attorney-Client Privilege And Charging Trump 'For Asking a Question'Chris MenahanInformationLiberation Jun. 13, 2023 |
Henry Kissinger Dead at 100
HATE HOAX: Israeli-German Singer Admits He Lied About Hotel Discriminating Against Him for Being Jewish
Israeli Hostage's Lack of Makeup Presented as Evidence of Hamas Abuse
NYT: Israel Had Hamas's Attack Plan For Over a Year
'Go F--k Yourself': Elon Musk Slams Advertisers Trying to 'Blackmail' Him With Ad Boycotts
![]() ![]() Via Michael Tracey:
From The New York Times, "Trump Indictment Shows Critical Evidence Came From One of His Own Lawyers": The two indictments filed so far against former President Donald J. Trump — one brought by the Manhattan district attorney, the other by a Justice Department special counsel — charge him with very different crimes but have something in common: Both were based, at least in part, on the words of his own lawyers.Tracey has been on a roll highlighting the utter lunacy involved in this case. "'Trump Attorney 1' is [Evan] Corcoran who was forced to testify to the grand jury and hand over notes memorializing conversations with his client, Trump. Abolishing bedrock principles of attorney-client privilege: another casualty of the principle of throwing Trump in prison," Tracey commented.
"'What happens if we just don't respond' is exactly the type of question you'd expect a client to ask his lawyer in the context of privileged, confidential communications. But here the DOJ decided to *seize* those communications and present them as evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Obliterating civil liberties and empowering the National Security State in the name of taking down Trump -- the neverending story," Tracey said.
Tracey shared more on Jack Smith:
The charges are laughable considering the President has the authority to declassify anything he wants.
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Minds and Telegram. |