NYT Stealth-Edits Headline Claiming U.N. Found 'Evidence' of Hamas RapesChris MenahanInformationLiberation Mar. 05, 2024 |
Rep. Thomas Massie Warns Congress is Trying to Pass Hate Speech Laws to Outlaw Criticism of Israel
ADL Urged Congress to Pass FISA Law Spying on Americans to 'Protect Israel'
'Sniper Seen on Roof Overlooking Pro-Palestine Protest' at Indiana University
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
Axios Poll: Majority of Americans Now Want Mass Deportations
The New York Times, which is on the ropes over their "Hamas mass rapes" story falling apart, tried to prop up their failing narrative by falsely claiming the UN found "clear and convincing evidence" of sexual assault.
Times journalist Farnaz Fassihi appears to have blocked Blumenthal on Twitter for pointing this out. She also blocked anyone from commenting on her tweets. They didn't find "evidence" of anything as they were blocked from doing any serious investigation by the Israeli government.
Max Blumenthal wrote Monday on Twitter: At presser just now, Patten claims "sexual violence occurred on 7 October," yet concedes:
Blumenthal added on Tuesday: Western media hyping Pramila Patten’s UN report as proof of “Hamas mass rape” left out a key section which
The report actually undermined many of the lies spread by the New York Times (full image here):
The media outlets which pushed the hoax are now citing the UN's report to prop up their lies:
The Intercept, meanwhile, released another report noting how multiple of the "victims specifically singled out by the New York Times" were not victims at all, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be'eri.
There's no "reasonable grounds" to believe any of the claims about "Hamas mass rapes" because no actual evidence has ever been produced. The media is simply repeating their "Big Lie" over and over again in the hope that people will believe it. Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Minds and Telegram. |