The atrocity propaganda tale was supposed to provide a pretext for Israel's genocidal ethnic cleansing campaign in Gaza the same way Judith Miller's lies about Saddam Hussein having WMDs in the NY Times were used to con America into the war in Iraq.
The Times is reportedly now launching an internal "witch hunt" to find the leaker(s) in their own organization who are refusing to help launder their latest atrocity propaganda hoax.
New York Times Launches Leak Investigation Over Report on Its Israel-Gaza Coverage
Management has questioned staffers, including Daily producers, after The Intercept revealed internal debate over a yet-to-air episode on Hamas weaponizing sexual violence. Such a probe is highly unusual, say staffers, one of whom dubbed it a "witch hunt."
BY CHARLOTTE KLEIN | FEBRUARY 29, 2024
The New York Times is conducting a leak investigation following a report in The Intercept about a yet-to-be-aired episode of The Daily addressing explosive claims of sexual violence committed by Hamas on October 7. Management in recent weeks has pulled at least two dozen staffers, including Daily producers, into meetings in an attempt to understand how internal details about the podcast's editorial process got out, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The investigation, I'm told, is being led by Charlotte Behrendt, the paper's director of policy and internal investigations.
In late January, The Intercept reported that the Times had planned to air an episode of The Daily weeks earlier that was based on a December Times investigation, led by Pulitzer Prize–winner Jeffrey Gettleman and coauthored by freelancers Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella, about how Hamas "weaponized sexual violence" in the October attack on Israel. But the paper shelved that episode "amid a furious internal debate about the strength of the paper's original reporting on the subject," according to The Intercept, which noted that a new script was drafted that "offered major caveats, allowed for uncertainty, and asked open-ended questions that were absent from the original article, which presented its findings as definitive evidence of the systematic use of sexual violence as a weapon of war." The Intercept's Daniel Boguslaw and Ryan Grim suggested that producers and the paper faced a conundrum: "run a version that hews closely to the previously published story and risk republishing serious mistakes, or publish a heavily toned-down version, raising questions about whether the paper still stands by the original report." (Times spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander told The Intercept that the paper does not comment on ongoing reporting and that "there is only one 'version' of any piece of audio journalism: the one that publishes.")
It's highly unusual for the Times to conduct a leak investigation, with multiple staffers saying this is the first such internal probe they can recall taking place. "It's not something we do," said one. "That kind of witch hunt is really concerning."
The Intercept released another report on Thursday exposing the NYT's Hamas mass rape story as a manufactured hoax:
Now we know @nytimes "Hamas mass rape" hoax—which like NYT's Iraqi WMD hoax directly killed thousands of Arabs—was ordered from the top. NYT editors sent pro-war extremist Amat Schwartz & her nephew out on an afikomen hunt for a story already pre-written.https://t.co/RM5he8PjFvpic.twitter.com/lP0R4BWlYb
Even though Gettleman's story claimed there was "a pattern of rape, mutilation and extreme brutality against women in the attacks on Israel" a Times spokesperson told the Intercept in a statement for their story on Thursday "that there may have been systematic use of sexual assault" on October 7th, Aaron Mate noted.
The New York Times is walking back @gettleman's scam "Hamas sexual violence" story without acknowledging it.
A Times spokesperson now says that the story showed "that there may have been systematic use of sexual assault" on Oct. 7th. But @gettleman's story asserted that there… pic.twitter.com/lhpwnuCBkP
BREAKING: The Intercept reports that journalists inside the New York Times are horrified by the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax its editors allowed Anat Schwartz, Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman to fabricate, and they fear they will scapegoat Schwartz to let it stand pic.twitter.com/R8AW6FvVgh
the other "on the ground reporter" who gave Gettleman all the materials for the hoax, which he then gleefully wrote up, is Adam Sella, the nephew of Schwartz' husband, a recent college grad aspiring food writer with also zero reporting experience:https://t.co/3W7olHxM03
this is astonishing. After the NYT gave Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella the job of being lead "reporters", she describes not being able to find any evidence whatsoever of "mass rapes", and then she finally sees the light: The Zaka pedophile rape cult 40 beheaded babies hoaxers pic.twitter.com/LA8nQkk6Zk
she also confirmed what she expressed before the New York Times assigned her, Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman to collaboratively concoct the biggest hoax in NYT history since Judith Miller laundered the WMD lie: "It's important for Israeli propaganda."https://t.co/c4IOrLBKYbpic.twitter.com/3vP2iahSyC
It must be underlined how disgraced Zionist journalist Judith Miller similarly lied America into war on behalf of Israel two decades ago with fake news stories in The Times claiming Iraq had WMDs and was working on a nuclear bomb.
At what point does lying to the public to advance the interests of a foreign power and con America into war become a criminal conspiracy and an act of treason?