|
Copyright Monopolist Claims Legal, Non-Infringing "Fair Use" Is Like Aggravated RapeFalkvingeDec. 23, 2015 |
Popular 
Trump Expected to Pick Kevin Warsh, Son-in-Law of Zionist Billionaire Ron Lauder, as Fed Chair
New TikTok CEO Told World Jewish Congress How They Censored Criticism of 'Zionists'
Video Appears to Show Alex Pretti Spit at ICE, Kick Taillight Out of ICE Vehicle in Prior Confrontation
Ambassador Mike Huckabee Held Secret Meeting With Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard, NYT Reveals
Israeli-American Council Asks Miriam Adelson and Haim Saban How They Control U.S. Politicians
 In a fuming blog article, David Newhoff claims that non-infringing, legal uses of copyrighted works – that is, of people’s own property – are like “aggravated rape” when made without unneeded consent of the monopoly holder. Newhoff tries to scold the crucial concept of “fair use” in copyright monopoly doctrine, the concept which explicitly says that some usages are not covered by the monopoly and therefore not up to the monopoly holder, and ends saying that if you don’t grant permission and can’t set limits, it’s “aggravated rape”. Just when you think copyright monopoly zealots can’t sink any lower, they surprise you with one of the few creativities they’ve ever shown. Read More 
|
