Afghanistan prison 'quietly expanded'Raw StoryFeb. 26, 2006 |
House GOP Drafting Impeachment Articles Against Biden for Threatening to Halt Aid to Israel
'We Also Slaughtered Innocent People in Massive Numbers': Gen. Milley Gives Bizarre Defense of Israel
AIPAC-Funded Congressmen Push for 'October 7th Remembrance Curriculum' to be Taught in Schools
GOP Bill Aims to Designate Student Protesters As 'Terrorists' And Put Them On The No Fly List
Report: Major Media Outlets Partnered With AI Company Are Filling Google With AI-Generated Trash
An Afghanistan prison that currently holds up to 500 terror suspects in "primitive conditions, indefinitely and without charges" has "quietly expanded," according to a front page story set for Sunday's New York Times. Excerpts from the article by Tim Golden and Eric Schmitt: Pentagon officials have often described the detention site at Bagram, a cavernous former machine shop on an American air base 40 miles north of Kabul, as a screening center. They said most of the detainees were Afghans who might eventually be released under an amnesty program or transferred to an Afghan prison that is to be built with American aid. But some of the detainees have already been held at Bagram for as long as two or three years. And unlike those at Guant?namo, they have no access to lawyers, no right to hear the allegations against them and only rudimentary reviews of their status as "enemy combatants," military officials said. Privately, some administration officials acknowledge that the situation at Bagram has increasingly come to resemble the legal void that led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling in June 2004 affirming the right of prisoners at Guant?namo to challenge their detention in United States courts. While Guant?namo offers carefully scripted tours for members of Congress and journalists, Bagram has operated in rigorous secrecy since it opened in 2002. It bars outside visitors except for the international red cross and refuses to make public the names of those held there. The prison may not be photographed, even from a distance. # New York Times subscribers can read the read of the article here. |