Supreme Court Blocks Biden OSHA Vax Mandate For Businesses, Allows Rule For Health Care Workers

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation
Jan. 13, 2022

The uniformly fully-vaxxed and boosted Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden regime's "vaccine" mandate for businesses but allowed the mandate for health care workers.

From Fox News, "Supreme Court blocks Biden OSHA vaccine mandate, allows rule for health care workers":
The Supreme Court on Thursday issued mixed rulings in a pair of cases challenging Biden administration COVID-19 vaccine mandates, allowing the requirement for certain health care workers to go into effect while blocking enforcement of a mandate for businesses with 100 or more employees.

The latter, an Occupational Safety and Health Administration rule that took effect on Monday, said that businesses with at least 100 employees needed to require workers to get vaccinated, or get tested weekly and wear a mask.

The Court ruled that OSHA lacked the authority to impose such a mandate because the law that created OSHA "empowers the Secretary to set workplace safety standards, not broad public health measures."

"Although COVID-19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most," the Court ruled. "COVID–19 can and does spread at home, in schools, during sporting events, and everywhere else that people gather. That kind of universal risk is no different from the day-to-day dangers that all face from crime, air pollution, or any number of communicable diseases."

For these reasons, the OSHA mandate "would significantly expand" the agency's authority beyond the limits Congress set, the Court ruled.

By contrast, in Biden v. Missouri, the Court ruled that Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra did have the authority to require all health care workers at institutions that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding to get the jab, unless they get medical or religious exemptions.
To be clear, that means health care institutions must allow medical and religious exemptions, so this is not quite as terrible as it could be.

The HHS requirement "does not have a daily or weekly testing option for unvaccinated workers, but does include medical and religious exemptions," CBS News reports.
The Biden administration estimated the vaccine mandate affects more than 17 million employees in roughly 76,000 facilities.

[...] The Supreme Court, with its 5-4 decision, lifted the lower court decisions that stopped enforcement of the mandate for health care workers in 24 states. The rule, the court said, "fits neatly" within the language of federal law allowing the secretary to impose conditions on Medicaid and Medicare funds.

"After all, ensuring that providers take steps to avoid transmitting a dangerous virus to their patients is consistent with the fundamental principle of the medical profession: first, do no harm," the Supreme Court said.
It was Kavanaugh and Roberts (who else) who went turncoat and backed that insane HHS rule under the false premise that the shots prevent transmission.


It's great that they blocked the OSHA mandate which applied to some 100 million workers but the mandate for some 17 million healthcare workers is just as crazy and they're allowing it to stand.

We're in a two steps forward, one step back situation despite having a so-called "conservative" 6-3 Supreme Court.

We all saw how Sotomayor spewed insane misinformation in defense of these mandates, indicating she didn't even bother to do the most rudimentary research, yet she and the other "liberal" justices had no problems just voting down party lines in defense of the blatantly unconstitutional OSHA mandate.

On the other hand, the "conservatives" are sitting around looking for little technicalities they can use to strike down the OSHA mandate while preserving the health care worker mandate to give some semblance of "balance."

The Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in 2015 despite widespread public opposition and in 2020 both Gorsuch and Roberts joined with the libs to redefine "sex" and write transgenderism into the 1964 Civil Rights Act to bar so-called "discrimination."

Those were both massive rulings throwing a Molotov on traditional America and yet when it comes to defending our rights all we get are little rulings based on technicalities.

The fact of the matter is these "vaccines" are not even vaccines, the CDC had to change the definition of what a "vaccine" was to classify these allegedly temporarily effective (at best) mRNA therapeutics as "vaccines."



Fauci just yesterday said that "sooner or later, virtually everybody is going to wind up getting exposed and likely get infected," regardless of whether or not they're "vaccinated."


These are mandates for a temporary therapeutic approved only for "emergency use" with zero long-term clinical trials on their side-effects, record adverse events and highly questionable real-life effectiveness against a rapidly-evolving virus after just a few months.



The idea these shots could be mandated for anyone is outrageous and totally un-American.

Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Parler and Telegram.












All original InformationLiberation articles CC 4.0



About - Privacy Policy