"Math Is Racist" -- CNN Goes Full RetardChris Menahan
Sep. 08, 2016
CNN Asks 'Undecided Voters' If Debate Had Clear Winner - Only One Person Raises Hand For Biden
CNN's Jake Tapper: Trump Made My Female Friend's 6th Grade Daughter 'Burst Into Tears'
Spain Runs NATO Missions by 'Gender Advisor' to 'Integrate Gender Perspective' Into Military Ops
Fox News: Biden Camp Requested Breaks Every 30 Mins During Debate, Refused Inspection For Earpieces
FIREWORKS! Trump Goes to War With Senile Joe In First Presidential Debate
This is not from a satire parody site, nor is the article a joke, CNN has now declared "math is racist."
It's no surprise that inequality in the U.S. is on the rise. But what you might not know is that math is partly to blame. In a new book, "Weapons of Math Destruction," Cathy O'Neil details all the ways that math is essentially being used for evil (my word, not hers).
Denied a job because of a personality test? Too bad -- the algorithm said you wouldn't be a good fit. Charged a higher rate for a loan? Well, people in your zip code tend to be riskier borrowers. Received a harsher prison sentence? Here's the thing: Your friends and family have criminal records too, so you're likely to be a repeat offender. (Spoiler: The people on the receiving end of these messages don't actually get an explanation.)These are basic tools for risk management.
The feelings of weird feminists are not taken into account when creating risk models, they look at raw data to determine risk and judge people accordingly.
Who is more likely to pay a loan back: a middle class white person in a nice neighborhood, or a poor African-American living in Section 8 housing?
The government declared in the 1990's it's racist not to give housing loans to low income minorities simply because they weren't likely to pay them back, that eventually lead to the 2008 housing crisis.
... One of the book's most compelling sections is on "recidivism models." For years, criminal sentencing was inconsistent and biased against minorities. So some states started using recidivism models to guide sentencing. These take into account things like prior convictions, where you live, drug and alcohol use, previous police encounters, and criminal records of friends and family.This is completely debunked nonsense.
Blake Neff in The Daily Caller debunked this same garbage which was shared in a ProPublica study titled "Machine Bias," which similarly tried to claim these recidivism models are "racist."
As Neff wrote:
Nowhere in the main article do ProPublica’s writers mention their own finding, which is that the risk scores accurately correspond to the reoffense risk of whites and blacks. In fact, the entire article never mentions that blacks have a higher recidivism rate at all.Nowhere does CNN mention their higher recidivism rate either.
The models reflect reality.
CNN goes on to state this basic risk assessment is literally "evil" and concludes by saying minorities need to be given more welfare because computer models are discriminating against them.
Imagine if you used recidivist models to provide the at-risk inmates with counseling and job training while in prison. Or if police doubled down on foot patrols in high crime zip codes -- working to build relationships with the community instead of arresting people for minor offenses.
"Big Data processes codify the past," O'Neil writes. "They do not invent the future. Doing that requires moral imagination, and that's something only humans can provide."Affirmative action, housing subsidies, race-based employment quotas, government subsidies exclusively for minority owned businesses, preferential college admissions, all of these -- which are explicitly based on race -- are not enough (and totally not racist).
We need to pay for criminals in prison to get "job training" and police need to stop arresting criminals in bad neighborhoods for committing crimes.
When math itself is being labeled as "racist," I think we can safely say the whole concept has finally jumped the shark.
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter and Facebook.