Anatomy Of A Bad ConfessionBy David BoeriWBUR Dec. 08, 2011 |
IDF Soldier Takes Sledgehammer to Jesus Statue During Operations in Lebanon
Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard Push for Nuking Iran
Reuters: Trump Approved Iran Strikes After Speaking With Netanyahu
Trump Says U.S. Sent 'A Lot of Guns' to Iranian 'Protesters'
Trump Fires Catholic Activist Carrie Prejean Boller From Religious Liberty Commission
![]() WORCESTER, Mass. — The world has always had its ways of extracting confessions. The rack, the screw, dunking — a method applied to suspected witches in Salem — the old, recently revived art of waterboarding and the simple rubber hose that gave menace to “the third degree” in the black and white heyday of police detectives have all proven their worth in winning confessions. It was only in 1936 that the common practices of hanging suspects out of windows, hitting them with hoses, and plunging their heads under water were effectively outlawed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Nowadays, police departments mainly rely upon psychological tools to extract confessions. If these methods seem less brutal in comparison, they can be even more effective, as a growing number of scientifically proven false confessions have demonstrated. Read More |