Appeals Court: Arresting Guy For Filming Cops Was A Clear Violation Of Both 1st & 4th Amendmentsby Mike MasnickTechdirt Aug. 30, 2011 |
IDF Soldier Takes Sledgehammer to Jesus Statue During Operations in Lebanon
Reuters: Trump Approved Iran Strikes After Speaking With Netanyahu
Trump Expected to Pick Kevin Warsh, Son-in-Law of Zionist Billionaire Ron Lauder, as Fed Chair
Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard Push for Nuking Iran
Trump Says U.S. Sent 'A Lot of Guns' to Iranian 'Protesters'
![]() We've had a lot of stories this year about police arresting people for filming them. It's become quite a trend. Even worse, a couple weeks ago, we wrote about a police officer in Massachusetts, Michael Sedergren, who is trying to get criminal wiretapping charges brought against a woman who filmed some police officers beating a guy. This officer claims that the woman violated Massachusetts anti-wiretapping law, a common claim from police in such situations. Segederin may have been better off if he'd waited a couple weeks for an appeals court ruling that came out Friday, because that ruling found that arresting someone for filming the police is a clear violation of both the First Amendment and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. |