Bush Administration Loses Major Terror Detention CaseThink ProgressJun. 13, 2007 |
Israel Lobby Seeking to Revamp U.S. Aid as 'Partnership' Immune to Political Shifts
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
Netanyahu Working to Cement U.S. Aid to Israel Through 'Partnership'
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
Thomas Massie vs. The Israel Lobby
![]() In a “major setback” to President Bush’s terrorism detention policies, a federal appeals court ruled today that the administration “cannot legally detain a U.S. resident it believes is an al-Qaida sleeper agent without charging him.” In the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that the federal Military Commissions Act doesn’t strip Ali al-Marri, a legal U.S. resident, of his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers in court.UPDATE: Read the full decision HERE. Human Rights First has an overview of the case. UPDATE II: Via ACSBlog, SCOTUSBlog explains what comes next: [T]he panel concluded, it would grant al-Marri habeas relief, though not immediate release. It said the government had accused him — though not with formal charges — of “grave crimes.” The case was returned to a federal judge in South Carolina with instructions to order the Pentagon to release al-Marri from military custody “within a reasonable period of time to be set by the District Court. The Government can transfer al-Marri to civilian authorities to face criminal charges, initiate deportation proceedings against him, hold him as a material witness in connection with grand jury proceedings, or detain him for a limited time pursuant to the Patriot Act. But military detention of al-Marri must cease.”UPDATE III: The New York Times calls the decision a “stinging rejection of one of the Bush administration’s central assertions about the scope of executive authority to combat terrorism.” |