Serve country till you're 55The SunJan. 09, 2007 |
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Israel Lobby Seeking to Revamp U.S. Aid as 'Partnership' Immune to Political Shifts
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
Thomas Massie vs. The Israel Lobby
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
![]() SQUADDIES could still be serving in the trenches at the age of FIFTY-FIVE under the Army’s new recruitment limit. Top brass have raised the top age for recruits by seven years to 33 to counter their desperate shortage of personnel. The last time the limit was that high was during the last days of the British Empire 59 years ago in the aftermath of World War Two. Amazingly it means soldiers who join up on a normal 22-year engagement could be fighting just five years ahead of their 60th birthday. Defence officials last night insisted the move was to harmonise rules across all three armed forces. But critics claim it is an emergency measure that reveals the true depth of the numbers crisis facing top brass. The Sun revealed yesterday how the infantry — now short of as many as 2,800 soldiers — is facing its worst manning problem in modern history. Some 38 out of the Army’s 39 bayonet battalions are short of men. Each unit is down an average of 74 soldiers, or a quarter of its fighting strength. Overworked troops are leaving in droves, saying they are unhappy with poor pay, slum accommodation and too much time away from their family. Across all the armed forces, the MoD are more than 6,000 below strength. While the Army has capped recruitment at 26 years, 11 months, the Royal Navy and RAF limits have long been set at 33 due to their less physical jobs. An Army policy review was prompted by new age legislation last October. In its findings, published in an internal Army document and seen by The Sun, chiefs said: “There is a lack of convincing evidence to support a case to continue with current differences in policy. “There is little confidence that current restrictions are either sensible or helpful in manning the Army.” Tory MP and ex-Army officer Patrick Mercer said: “This may be a sign of our sad times, but it is very sensible. Anything that improves the terrible crisis recruiters are facing must be good.” The new limit, confirmed by the MoD last night, counts for all cap badges and trades. Army musicians are the only exception, where new recruits can be 36 years, 11 months. The minimum age to join up will remain at 16½, with troops still unable to go to war until they turn 18. An MoD spokesman has insisted there is “no recruitment crisis" in the army. The statement was made in response to figures suggesting fewer people signed up than left between 2005 and 2006. During that period, the Government increased spending on Army recruitment by £3.6 million in the 2005 to 2006 period. Figures revealed by Defence Minister Derek Twigg showed that the number of new recruits rose from 11,720 in 2005 to 12,730 in 2006 - an increase of 1,010. But separate figures from the Defence Analytical Support Agency showed that 14,460 people quit the army in the year to June 2006, leading the Tories to claim there is a “retention crisis”. The MoD spokesman said that recruitment was “extremely buoyant.” He added that between April and December last year, 26,500 people applied to join the Army - nine per cent up on the same period in 2005 and 14 per cent up on the four-year average. The spokesman said: “Of course, like any large organisation, the recruiting environment is proving challenging at the moment and that is why we have been investing in our successful advertising campaigns. "But it is - as the figures ... show - plainly wrong to claim there is a crisis in recruitment.” |