Britain Worried About Excessive SurveillanceAngus ReidDec. 11, 2006 |
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Israel Lobby Seeking to Revamp U.S. Aid as 'Partnership' Immune to Political Shifts
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
Thomas Massie vs. The Israel Lobby
![]() Many Britons are concerned about the increased use of cameras and biometrics in their country, according to a poll by YouGov published in the Daily Telegraph. 79 per cent of respondents believe the country can accurately be described as a surveillance society. In 2004, home secretary David Blunkett strongly campaigned in favour of a national identity card system. The plan contemplates setting up a database that would contain the fingerprints and/or eye scan of every single person in Britain. The government estimates that the full implementation of the plan will cost $10.5 billion U.S. over the next 10 years. In November, British information commissioner Richard Thomas discussed the current state of affairs, saying, "Two years ago I warned that we were in danger of sleepwalking into a surveillance society. Today I fear that we are in fact waking up to a surveillance society that is already all around us." Polling Data Because of the increased use of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, speed cameras, biometric passports, fingerprinting and so forth, Britain is increasingly being described as a ‘surveillance society’. Do you think that is, on balance, an accurate description or not? Yes, it is an accurate description 79% No, it isn’t an accurate description 16% Don’t know 5% Source: YouGov / Daily Telegraph Methodology: Online interviews with 1,979 British adults, conducted from Nov. 28 to Nov. 30. 2006. No margin of error was provided. |