Draft report on Iraq strategy calls for Syria, Iran talks, but has no drive for pulloutRaw StoryNov. 28, 2006 |
From Aid to Dependency: Israeli Agent Reveals the Real Goal of 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
ADL, Jewish Groups Lobby California to Classify Jews as a Race, 'Not Just a Faith'
House Passes NDAA With Section 219 Aimed at 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Trump Welcomes 'The Highly Respected' Alan Dershowitz Into The GOP, Shills His New Book
![]() "A draft report on strategies for Iraq, which will be debated here by a bipartisan commission beginning on Monday, urges an aggressive regional diplomatic initiative that includes direct talks with Iran and Syria, but sets no timetables for a military withdrawal, according to officials who have seen all or parts of the document," the New York Times is set to report in page one Monday leads. Excerpts: While the diplomatic strategy appears likely to be accepted, with some amendments, by the 10-member Iraq Study Group, members of the commission and outsiders involved in its work said they expected a potentially divisive debate about timetables for beginning an American withdrawal. In interviews, several officials said that announcing a major withdrawal is the only way to persuade the government of Iraq's prime minister, Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, to focus on creating an effective Iraqi military force. One proposal would involve putting more American trainers into Iraqi military units in a last-ditch improvement effort, coupled with a withdrawal that in a year would leave between 70,000 and 80,000 American troops in the country, compared with about 150,000 now. FULL REGISTRATION-RESTRICTED STORY HERE. |