|
Very weird result in the CT race. Lamont loses with EXACT number that republican did in 2000Daily KosNov. 10, 2006 |
Popular 
From Aid to Dependency: Israeli Agent Reveals the Real Goal of 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
ADL, Jewish Groups Lobby California to Classify Jews as a Race, 'Not Just a Faith'
House Passes NDAA With Section 219 Aimed at 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
|
 Very weird result in the CT race. Lamont loses with EXACT number that republican did in 2000 Okay I was wondering how LIEberman did in 2000 so after spending a half hour trying to track down the numbers I found them on the FEC site. (I just rechecked the numbers and I had copied them wrong. they are exactly the same) drummer55's diary :: :: In 2000 here is the break down in voting per http://www.fec.gov/.... Democratic votes = 828,902 Republican votes = 448,077 Other votes = 34,282 okay now lets look at 2006 http://www.cnn.com/.... Lieberman votes = 562,850 Lamont votes = 448,077 Schlesinger votes = 109,329 Ferrucci votes = 5923 Knibbs votes = 4638 Somebody should have played the lottery because the odds of Lamont losing in 2006 with the EXACT amount of votes the republican lost with in 2000 is astronomically high. weird. Anybody have any thoughts on this? |
