Bush's Bloodbath in Babylon: 'Coincidence' and Consequencesby Chris FloydJul. 20, 2006 |
Israel Lobby Seeking to Revamp U.S. Aid as 'Partnership' Immune to Political Shifts
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
IDF Soldier Takes Sledgehammer to Jesus Statue During Operations in Lebanon
Thomas Massie vs. The Israel Lobby
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
![]() Neighbors are Killing Neighbors (Washington Post): After more than a week of some of the most vicious sectarian violence of the war, Baghdad is a skeleton of a city: Many of its shops are shuttered, its streets drained of people. The violence erupted July 9 when Shiite Muslim militiamen rampaged through the al-Jihad neighborhood and killed dozens of Sunni Arabs. By Friday, the sixth day, the death toll in Baghdad stood at 628 people, according to Brig. Gen. Mahmoud Nima of the Interior Ministry, citing a figure that far exceeded the numbers previously suggested by news reports.Can it be a total coincidence that the hellstorm of murder and mayhem that has now turned Baghdad into "a skeleton of a city" began just after Bush and al-Maliki announced their ballyhooed "security push," pouring thousands of new troops and police into the capital's streets? Can it be a total coincidence that much of the new violence has been carried out by "men dressed in the uniforms of the Iraqi police," to use the timid euphemism adopted by the mainstream media, and by militia forces associated with perhaps the key political player in the new "sovereign" government, the hidebound religious crank Motqada al-Sadr? Can it be a total coincidence that the new horror devouring the conquered land has led some hardline Sunni leaders once bitterly opposed to the U.S. occupation now want American forces to stay, in order to quell the chaos, offset Shiite dominance and ward off Iranian influence? Can it be a total coincidence that this desire bolsters the Bush Regime's long-held intention to establish a permanent military presence in Iraq? Can it be a total coincidence that the steady rise in militia violence – now reaching apocalyptic heights – has followed the Bush Regime's open bruiting of the "Salvador Option" – i.e., employing militias and death squads as part of "counterinsurgency" operations in Iraq, just like those Reagan-Bush glory days of yore, when the ditches and back alleys of Central America ran red with the blood of innocent thousands slaughtered by U.S.-backed, U.S.-bought terrorists? Can it be a total coincidence that this rise followed the implementation of the Bush Regime's lavishly-funded, openly attested program "to arm and train non-governmental 'local militias' – i.e., bands of lawless freebooters – to serve as Washington's proxy killers in the so-called 'arc of crisis" that just happens to stretch across the oil-bearing lands and strategic pipeline routes of Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia and South America," as we reported in August 2004? That's when then-Pentagon poo-bah Paul Wolfowitz told a Congressional committee that: Bush wants big bucks [the request was for $500 million] to run 'counter-insurgency' and 'counter-terrorist' operations in 'ungoverned areas' of the world – and in the hinterlands of nations providing 'sanctuary' for terrorists. Making copious citations from Bush's 2002 'National Security Strategy' of unprovoked aggressive war against 'potential' enemies, Howlin' Wolf proposed expanding the definition of "terrorist sanctuary" to any nation that allows clerics and other rabble-rousers to offer even verbal encouragement to America's designated enemies du jour.Can it really be a total coincidence that the rise in sectarian and terrorist murder follows the Pentagon's adoption of a plan to foment terrorism by infiltrating violent groups and goading them into action? I first wrote of this plan back in November 2002, when it first surfaced via outstanding investigative work by William Arkin. Then in January 2005, Sy Hersh came up with the goods to confirm that the plan was indeed in operation. As I wrote then: Not only will U.S.-directed agents infiltrate existing terrorist groups and provoke them into action; the Pentagon itself will create its own terrorist groups and "death squads." After establishing their terrorist "credentials" through various atrocities and crimes, these American-run groups will then be able to ally with – and ultimately undermine – existing terrorist groups.Can it really be a complete and total coincidence, an amazing accident of history, that the "blood-dimmed tide" now loosed upon Iraq follows so closely upon the Bush Regime's plans to foment terrorism, employ death squads and "ride with the bad boys" in order to achieve its strategic goals – and that the reign of terrorism, death squads and bad boys now ravaging Iraq has convinced even some of the most recalcitrant opponents of the occupation that American forces should stay in Iraq…which happens to be one of the Regime's primary strategic goals? Without in any way imputing the hydra-headed hell in Iraq to a single cause – for of course as with all human events, the situation there has coalesced from a myriad of different, confused, even contradictory factors – can we really say that the rise in violence has nothing to do with the plans and intentions of the Bush Regime outlined above? Is it really just a complete coincidence? _________ Chris Floyd, Global Eye columnist for the Moscow Times, is the author of Empire Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime. |