Suggestions for the White House "Director for Lessons Learned"The Carpetbagger ReportJul. 15, 2006 |
Mark Levin Accuses Me of 'Trying to Commit Violence' Against Him by Clipping His Show
Ben Shapiro Pushes Noahide Laws at TPUSA Event, Throws a Fit Over Being Quoted Word-For-Word
House Passes NDAA With Section 219 Aimed at 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
From Aid to Dependency: Israeli Agent Reveals the Real Goal of 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
ADL, Jewish Groups Lobby California to Classify Jews as a Race, 'Not Just a Faith'
![]() National Journal published a list this week of salaries for the several hundred political appointees who work at the White House. As TP noted, one guy, Stuart Baker, makes $106,641 a year to serve as the president's "Director for Lessons Learned." It is, by any reasonable measure, the most patently absurd title in Washington. It's not altogether clear what, if anything, Baker actually does. Poking around, I found that he was a former NSA general counsel and the Assistant Secretary for Policy at the Department of Homeland Security before taking on his current job, but there's no reported evidence of him actually having done anything at the White House. Is the Bush gang still looking for those learned lessons? Regardless, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) thinks we should save some money, eliminate Baker's post, and consider "a few of the lessons this White House should have learned by now." Lesson 1: When the Army Chief of Staff and the Secretary of State say you are going to war without enough troops, you're going to war without enough troops.Maybe we should compile a list and send it to Baker. I'm sure he'd appreciate the assistance. |