A Rejoinder to the RonPaul.com Affairby James E. Miller
Feb. 15, 2013
1.Trump is Right: GOP Debate Audience is Packed Full of Republican Donors
2.'End of Europe': Trump Slams Merkel's Refugee Policy, Wants Good Relations With Russia
3.FOX Con-Artists Use Unnecessary Censorship To Make Trump Sound Like He Said 'F*ck'
4.75-Yr-Old German Grandmother Tells of Sexual Harassment by Migrants, Interview Gets Interrupted by Clueless "Integrated" Muslim Teens
5.New 'Traffic Violations Agency' Brings Buffalo Extortion Racket to All Time High
6.Government Agents Hunt Woman Down After Seeing Facebook Picture Of Her Rehabilitating Baby Squirrels
7.Julian Assange Warns "A Vote For Hillary Is A Vote For Endless, Stupid War"
8.Illinois: Cops Lose Case After Hiding Video Evidence
Sorry, but ICANN is hardly "private," it's a government granted monopoly with no competition, it's rules are reflective of the statist framework which it was created by and operates under. As a result, many of their rules are idiotic and antithetical to free markets, these trademark ones are case in point. - ChrisIn light of new facts previously unknown to me, the affair over ownership of RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org turns out to be more complicated than I originally considered. These warrant a written response -as does Robert Wenzel’s rebuttal to my criticism of his “designed” rights theory.