The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Multimedia posted Mar 25 2006, 12:30 AM Source: InformationLiberation Print

The Capitalist Conspiracy

An Inside View Of International Banking

Edward Griffin - The Capitalist Conspiracy: An Inside view of International Banking

Written and narrated by G. Edward Griffin
(1960's) An old film, made sometime in the 60's.

This is an adaptation of a documentary filmstrip tracing the history of a small group of people who control the money systems of the world. It shows how this group is protected by governments and how its wealth is derived by creating money out of nothing. We see how this group wields power through government, foundations, education, and the mass media. It has aided such regimes as Russia and China, not because it is pro-Communist, but because a visible enemy and the threat of war have been useful in persuading the masses to embrace the group's ultimate goal: a world government which they expect to control from behind the scenes. They are now working to replace fear of nuclear war with fear of global pollution as the motivation for world government. It is clear that the plan revealed in this program continues to unfold.

Monopoly is not an outgrowth of capitalism. Monopolists lobby for laws that give them advantages in the market place. Monopoly is not based on free-enterprise competition, but the escape from it. It is not the product of capitalism but the bedfellow of socialism.

The Capitalist Conspiracy
An Inside View Of International Banking

Carroll Quigley: Tragedy and Hope (1966)
Edward Mandell House: Philip Dru: Administrator: A Story of Tomorrow, 1920-1935 (1912)

> View More Multimedia You Won't Find on TV

Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Nov 12 2006, 2:32 AM

7136 At this stage of the conspiracy, the monopoly capitalists are preparing to impose a communist system on the United States. This was revealed by KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn who published NEW Lies For Old and The Perestroika Decepion. The last three decades have been preparation for this final conquest and explains why the U.S. lost the drug war, the espionage war and the cold war. The Russian leadership through the KGB were behind the drugs. This has been so profitable for them that they have recently managed to pay off the Russian national debt. The final stroke in America will be revolution in the streets followed by a Russian/Islamic invasion as shown to Ezekial the Old Testament prophet. Israel in the last days is mainly Western Civilization. The prophicies indicate Russia will not be successful, but only because God will intervene through nature. America will rise again like the phoenix. But we will pay an enormous price for not being victorious in defeating world communism as God commissioned America to do. Instaead of following up on our victory after world War II we continued to allow the monopoly capitalists to rule us. Our greatest mistake was to allow them to take control of our money in 1913. We are still paying the price and will go on the cross to be crucified for having failed to challenge these dark souls.

Posted: Nov 26 2006, 7:58 PM

The Zionist bankers have been behind allot more than you realize...They financed and created Russian communism and over threw the Czar, They Financed, created and controlled Hitler...They have have been secretly killing Christians for the past hundred years. They have killed over 200 million of them..Why do you think they had the Iron Curtain on Russia? what do you think thyey were hiding behind the curtain..It was the deliberate wiping out and killing of almost 60 million Christians....The German people were Christians and the allied killed millions of them with carpet fire bombing..Remember the German people did not have any control over Hitler...The German people were the victims..How about the Rwanda massacre where over a million were killed..They were all Christians..That was achieved through their local radio stations constant hate speech....Once you understand who really owns and controls most almost all of the worlds understand who is really doing all this....even the story about Yugoslavia is all a lie..The allieds went in and bombed that place for some 80 days..They were bombing Chrsitians and all Christian churches..some were the most beautiful 1500 year old churches...
Mike Corbeil

Posted: Aug 29 2007, 10:48 PM

24226 Anonymous provides a reference because of naming the former KGB officer or agent, but NO links to any articles or resources that one way or another support Anon.'s post. The KGB and Russia are NOT the sole parties to have been involved in making the drug war profitable, or simply making drug trafficking, over much longer history, profitable; and it'd be foolish to think that other people of other countries don't have anything seriously in common with Russians who profit from drug trafficking and crimes. That is not something that is unique to any particular people; except, and only perhaps, in a propagandistic Walt Disney film, f.e.

Craig Murray, formerly UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, among other countries, has a very interesting story with regards to high-ranking Russian officials, at the federal and down to the local levels, profiting from international trafficking of heroin. HOWEVER, they are FAR from the only people to profit from this and other crimes, too.

"Afghanistan: Britain is protecting the biggest heroin crop of all time", by Craig Murray, Daily Mail, UK, July 24 2007,

Yet that only speaks of Russian officials being involved as profiteers; it doesn't say that Americans and Europeans are not involved, and they definitely are. It is how to explain the minimally 60% rise in poppy production since the launch of this war on the Taliban (and Afghanistan) in Oct. 2001, after the Taliban, working with the UN, extremely eliminated poppy production. After all, it's not the Taliban who have been producers and profiteers of the heroin and opium trades, it was and remains the war-and-drug-lords of the northern part of Afghanistan, including General Dostum, who is not Afghan but Uzbek and therefore, as Murray explains in the above article, has privileged entrance in to Uzbekistan for his drug trafficking, shipment convoys.

The U.S., U.K. and Germany profited from selling high-tech border control security and the Uzbek govt, the border controllers anyway, let Dostum's drug convoys bypass this security surveillance; while of course the U.S. and surely the U.K. and Germany are very most likely aware of this; just that they're making profit in two ways, instead of only one. Heh, when criminals to the extent of these people, why not profit from selling this high-tech security stuff to the Uzbek govt, while also profiting from that govt letting Dostum's convoys bypass the security apparatus?!

Americans are not in a good position to criticize Russia, for Americans who do so always do it hypocritically. After all, ALL of U.S. history is about MAJOR GENOCIDE and the very fatal kind; and that genocide is really ongoing. I am referring to what the Euro-Americans did and continue to do to the First Nations Peoples of North America, and the same very much applies throughout ALL of the Americas, always Euro-schmucks doing to others what they would refuse to allow to be done to themselves, ETC.

Russia has its bad historical periods, but so do Europe and the USA, and without needing Russia's influence.

That Russia has climbed out of poverty or to pay off the natoinal debt because of the drug trafficking, this is clearly only speculation, for Anon. did not provide any links to any supporting resources; Anon. obviously thinking that readers are supposed to think that his word is as good as God's, it seems. Well, I won't make that mistake and therefore won't perceive Anon. or anyone else who refuse to support what he says with links or at least very clear and specific references to resources for what the person says.

Russia also has very serious oil and gas business, and getting rid of the bastards who corrupted Russian state, nationalized oil and gas business, making themselves rich as hell while screwing all of the rest of Russia, well, recovering these business so that they're re-nationalized sure is puttng a LOT of money where it's need for Russians, all of them. And Russia has serious business contracts with European countries, as well as states that were formerly part of the USSR.

It's not for no reason that the Cheney-Bush administration and the behind-closed-doors people they work for are building up to go after Russia's natural resources, certainly oil and gas. It's not for no reason that NATO is very involved in this.

And it's also not for no reason that MUCH of what's really going on and has happened in African countries over the past fifteen years and more is again very underreported news in the West, and very much about West preying on the peoples of all countries rich in profitable natural resources.

Those topics can be learned about through articles in subindexes at , certainly the sub-saharan Africa and the oil and energy subindexes. One of the authors who has at least two articles posted at GR and on Africa is Keith Harmon Snow, and more can be found at his website, .

Following are some other recommendable articles on Afghanistan and the opium and heroin trade.

"Record opium crop in southern Afghanistan", by Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, June 28, 2007,

"Why 'legalising' Afghan opium for medicine is a non-starter", by Transform Drugs Policy Foundation , , May 18, 2007

"Heroin is 'Good for Your Health': Occupation Forces support Afghan Narcotics Trade.
Multibillion dollar earnings for organized crime and Western financial Institutions",
by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky,, April 29, 2007,

"Afghanistan’s opium crop at an all-time high", by Jerry Mazza, Online Journal, Dec. 9 2006, originally of Dec. 7th,

"The War in Afghanistan: Drugs, Money Laundering and the Banking System", by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Oct. 17 2006,

"Who benefits from the Afghan Opium Trade?", by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, Sept. 21, 2006,

"The Spoils of War: Afghanistan's Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade.
Washington's Hidden Agenda: Restore the Drug Trade",
by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, May 5, 2005, and (for some reason I don't know of) 2005-06-14,

Anyway, I've never heard or read of "KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn" before and will do some Web searching to try to find articles on or about him, as well as about what he says; yet Anon. and ALL other Internet users who post on the Internet should get with providing links to supporting resources when making claims that are out of the ordinary, or that most people have never heard about.

The U.S. did NOT lose the drug war because of Russia; definitely not. The U.S. lost the drug war because it always was totally bogus, full of hypocrisy, full of U.S. elite committing black market gangsterism, nationally and internationally, and etc. It is just like former USMC Major General Smedley Butler wrote about with his book 'WAR IS A RACKET'. He was definitely right about that, and he was talking about the U.S. involvement in wars. And it is very easy to see that 'drug war' has the word 'war' in it.

It is not for no reason that the U.S. govt keeps benign and beneficial marijuana illegal, while being black-market-complicit in the profiteering of international trafficking of heroin and surely also cocaine, although wanting to push the latter mostly as an ingredient of the stuff called crack, which is NOT cocaine; only having it as one of the ingredients, along with crystal meth and other substances. Pure cocaine is so little addictive that it's NOT worth speaking of it as being addictive; but crack is addictive, and so is crystal meth, a potent amphetimine.

Rich Jews of Montreal were big in the importation business for hashish, too.

Anyway, the former KGB officer or agent Anon. speaks of could alternatively be lying and well paid to do so. Russia has had its share of traitors and profiteering traitors, too; while again not being unique.

And Anon. is surely and very exaggerated with respect to, f.e., "The final stroke in America will be revolution in the streets followed by a Russian/Islamic invasion as shown to Ezekial the Old Testament prophet. Israel in the last days is mainly Western Civilization". I would not give Anon. a second of serious thought with this sort of religious fanaticism that Anon. spews out here.

Given his or her fanatical character in this latter regard, his or her judgement in terms of the rest of what he or she says here is definitely to be very carefully examined and researched, for proving or debunking, which ever it turns out to be, or to just disregard his or her posts to begin with; the latter being quite a time saver.

THEN we have danieltowsey going fanatical on Zionism, being another person on the Web writing about Zionism as if it's the source or cause of all evils perpetrated by states and elite controllers of states in our world; all while neglecting that Zionism never was the commencement of human evils being perpetrated.

I think that the following are good to consider in this latter regard. The Google link is for a search that produces a single hit and which is for the PDF to download for reading a book by Dr John Coleman, 'Diplomacy by Deception'. I provide the Google link instead of the url for the PDF given that users may want to remove a search word or two to check for other articles on and/or by Coleman, whose website is .

The PDF download appears to contain the whole book, but while not having the end index; however that makes the PDF very complete, and the book can be obtained via Coleman's website and for around $20.

Here's the table of contents.

Table of Contents


(Also includes enough on the predecessor League of Nations, established around 1920, and by Rockefeller, Rothschild (a Zionist), U.S. Pres.
Wilson, European state leaders, etc. It was a structure planned a-la NWO and OWG (One World Govt) kind, which the U.N. is an expansion of. We'd like to think that that is not what is really intended of or for the U.N., but reading enough tells us that au contraire, it's what's intended. It helps to or simply does explain why two UN humanatarian directors, and starting during the latter part of the 1990s, resigned over the genocidal and mass-murderous economic sanctions against Iraq, f.e. They had to resign for the UNSC refused to respect the humanitarian agency, which is a very regular theme of the SC.

The humanitarian part(s) are more like Keith Harmon Snow described of humanitarian organizations operating in Africa, f.e.; sometimes unwittingly, other times wittingly, providing distracting cover-up of extreme predation and crimes of war and against humanity of the U.S. govt, NATO, etc. We also of course add U.N. "peacekeeping" forces when it comes to Africa, enough like in Haiti since Feb. 2004.

Anyway, ch. 1 is definitely valuable in terms of most people's knowledge of the history of the U.N. and the predecessor LoN.)


(Familiar topic but this has very educational content; did for me anyway.)


(Specially focuses on oil resources of Mexico, Iraq and Iran; history starting in 19th century, with "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848", when "Mexico ceded Upper California, New Mexico and northern Sonora, Coahuila and Tampaulis to the United States for $15 million", mainly or much due to OIL resources that were sought. And with all of this history, what people wrote or were quoted saying long ago, we get strong echoes when GHW Bush was pres., and with the present Cheney-Bush admin., f.e.; very strong echoes, almost like they are literally quoting these past people of U.S. history. We get that from other chapters in this book, too.)


(Ruthlessly gained ownership of U.S. oil co. Standard Oil and ruthlessly fought vs British exploiter of Mexican oil resources, etc.)


(I haven't read ch. 8 yet, but of what little I've seen of what he says on the topic, it's definitely educational, very unknown info., and important; historically anyway.)


YUGOSLAVIA, now this was not about Zionism, but was long-term about Russian; about the U.S. and NATO long-term focus to try to do all they can to weaken Russia in all strategic ways possibly achievable. They still haven't yet finished the project milestone with Yugoslavia, for Kosovo, as much as the U.S. has tried to get the U.N. to rule according to the whims of the elites controlling and profiteering from the U.S. govt's superpower war machine, well, they still have not yet succeeded in making Kosovo an independent state. They definitely want this, and it is the most pertinent reason for the gangster war perpetrated against former President Slobodan Milosevic, his govt, and Kosovo; but they haven't yet achieved this milestone, only continuing to work on trying to achieve completion of this step.

It's all it is, is a step. It's not an end in and of itself, but a step, milestone in the overall project and therefore plan.

John Coleman was totally new to me less than two weeks ago, but I've so far read up to and including chapter five of 'Diplomacy by Deception', and it definitely strikes me as a book that everyone should carefully and thorough read. If the remaining chapters are like the first five in terms of quality, then I'd say that people posting like Anon. did in this page, and others here at Info. Lib., and when posting about Zionism and as if it's is the source or cause of all state evils in our world, these people really need to carefully read a book like the above one by John Coleman.

Following is also a very recommended article.

"Orbit of Influence: Spy Finance and the Black Budget", by Robert Dreyfuss, Nov. 30 2002,

That is very MUCH about more racketeering, and certainly related to war, military war, but instead of the article being about the military-industrial complex, per se anyway, it's about the parallel and very profitable intelligence-industrial complex, which I had not seen or heard referred to before having read the above article and only yesterday.

His website is .

Another article of his, the one below, is a story that the anti-Zionist fanatics (I'm anti-Zionist but won't blindly be that or anything else, avoiding fanaticism, thank you all very much), well, these people surely will immediately repeat their claims about Zionism and how it and the Israeli govt (with the help of AIPAC and all U.S. officials supporting, etc., AIPAC) control the U.S. govt. That's a belief that I disagree with and for two reasons, but which I'll summarize by simply suggesting that people pay a lot more attention to being thorough in terms of detail, and to avoid judging or interpreting, so jumping to conclusions, instead of analytically arriving at them, based on appearances.

People who claim that Zionism and the state or govt of Israel control the U.S. govt are clearly enough making this judgement very much based on appearances, and they are strong, for Zionists' involvement, and publicly stated statements of psychopathically criminal nature by the Israeli leadership are wholly obvious for what they are; when they're reported anyway. These are strong appearances, but as strong as they may be or are, this does not mean that more is absent. Au contraire, this strongly obvious appearance or acting by these Israeli and Zionist lunatics could also be used by more powerful people and for purpose of distraction away from themselves. After all, those people know that all of this public obviousness of Israeli leaders and Zionists is known by many people, that many treat these sources as if they're the makers or causers of all evils committed by states on Earth; therefore, the top controllers, who also know that they protect Israel to a point that no one has the power to do anything to curb this protection, well, they can employ distraction for their "art of deception".

F.e., the two Harvard "elites" who wrote about the U.S. war on Iraq not being about oil, for there's rather no direct evidence of such a link (a nonsensical claim), but, they say, because of the Israeli govt and therefore Zionists and AIPAC; well, these two authors sure did not do but awfully partial work in this argumentation of theirs. There is a LOT of evidence for US and UK warring on both Iraq and Iran being about OIL; and John Coleman's book gives plenty of history on these two specific cases, as well as another, the case of Mexico's oil resources. And Keith Harmon Snow, among others with articles in the subsaharan Africa subindex at, f.e., they all explain what's really going on in African conflict areas and the reasons for these conflicts; again natural resources, and the U.S. govt being the main criminal, while making use of corrupt or corrupted African proxy govts, and corrupt and otherwise ignorant humanitarian organizations for cover-up purposes.

USMC Major Gen. Smedley Butler wrote 'WAR IS A RACKET' but a bunch of schoolbenchers pretend that they know more, are more experienced than he was; an awfully infantile way to live one's life, to have such fantastical and vain perspectives of ourselves. Butler knew strongly well what he was writing about.

Anyway, John J. Mearsheimer, prof. of political science at U. of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, of JFK School of Govt, argued in their paper that the war on Iraq, the present war, is NOT at all about oil, that there's no "direct evidence" for the claim that the war is really about oil, while they claim that it's all about Israel and the Israeli Lobby. Following are some related links.

"'The Israel Lobby', by John Mearsheimer & Stephen Walt: The Israel lobby debate", March 23 2006

That provides links following the article and for obtaining the prior and unedited version of the article or paper, and the original title is 'The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy'. The full and unedited article is obtained via a PDF download, but the two pages that LRB links to provide an abstract, and I'll quote that.

"The Israel Lobby & U.S. Foreign Policy", by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, March 2006,

Quote: "Abstract:
The centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy is its intimate relationship with Israel. Though often justified as reflecting shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives, the U.S. commitment to Israel is due primarily to the activities of the "Israel Lobby." This paper describes the various activities that pro-Israel groups have undertaken in order to shift U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction."

It is a mistake to jump to the conclusion that just because U.S. foreign policy has indeed been shifted as the abstract says, and therefore the co-authors say, well, that this means that the war on Iraq is not about oil, that there is no direct evidence to support the claims that the war is about oil, and that it's instead about what Israel wants, so Israel is thereby understood as controller of the U.S. govt. That is to definitely jump to conclusions; to definitely judge based on trying to interpret [appearances] as if they tell us the WHOLE truth.

There is MAJOR direct evidence that the war is about OIL. READ John Coleman's downloadable book!! Until people do that, they will only make fools of themselves, while also misleading many who are gullible, very naive, and very ignorant of real history, that is, when claiming that there is no direct evidence to support the claim that the war on Iraq is about OIL, and that Israel is only incidentally benefiting. Although very serious is the extent of that incidental benefit, it's still incidental; not the principal reason for the war on Iraq.

SEE Coleman's book, as well as the subsaharan Africa and oil and energy subindexes at, and Keith Harmon Snow's website; and then consider what the whole history of the U.S.A. is, which is again a-la 'WAR IS A RACKET', psychopathically so, for natural resources that belong to other peoples who are psychopathically aggressed, conquered, dominated, oppressed, and ONGOINGLY, like forever; F.E.

We have to make sure to avoid pretending that we have absolutely arrived at the full truth, ever, for it's something humans will surely never have about anything; MOST things anyway. We have to avoid pretending that we have absolutely thorough understanding of a subject when what we are really doing is judging based on appearances, therefore uncritically, erroneously, etc. Etc.

It means being very thorough and thoroughly honest in and about analyses. It takes "mathematical" precision.

I don't know the whole truth about all of this, but John Coleman and plenty of other people who know what they're talking about have provided en masse in terms of U.K. and U.S. histories of warring on Iran and Iraq, and for the OIL resources of both countries. This spans a century of such criminal aggressions, and that is a LOT of direct evidence. Some people would call that only circumstantial precedence, but it's so strong that it really is direct evidence.

The past theme has not died away; no one has buried it in its tomb and replaced it with a new theme; but what has happened is that the relationship with the state of Israel evolved and it's just another, additional excuse.

The past theme is very much why we have the projects for the North American Union and the Security and Prosperity (whose, for not the common citizens') Partnership, too. And that is NOT about Israel state and lobby, and Zionism, controlling the U.S. govt. They do NOT control the U.S. govt; the latter profits from Israel, instead.

Etc., and IMHO.

Mike Corbeil

Posted: Aug 29 2007, 11:41 PM

24226 One clear proof that Anonymous does not know what he or she is talking about, being some kind of wing-nut fanatical child, or, else, knowing what he or she is saying and therefore that he or she is spreading information that he or she can and does not provide anything but hearsay, nothing supported in reality.

Another example, in addition to those I've already mentioned in the prior post, is that Anon. clearly does NOT know what communism is. Another is that God NEVER "commissioned America" to do anything whatsoever, so forget about anything to do with destroying communism, which God would never suggest that anyone do. Either that, or Jesus of Nazareth is definitely not the person described in the Bible scripture(s). Well, it's the only historical telling of what his teachings and way were and are, and one set of those that is minimally inferred, if not explicitly found, is that he is for DISTRIBUTED WEALTH so that NO ONE is left to suffer from lack of basic or essential needs being fulfilled. That is not capitalism and is certainly not monopoly; it is communism, and many Christian religious orders, like monks and nuns, live communistically within their orders; all without being harmful to any degree whatsoever to others.

If God is against communism, then He's what? Well, there aren't many choices, for the only systems we have for comparison are socialism and capitalism, while bartering can exist in all of these systems; just that pig govts today tax barter agreements, when the govt learns of these anyway.

Doing a Wikipedia look-up on 'communism' produces links to a number of different pages on communism, such as, f.e.:

The 'Utopia' book is with respect to if not by Thomas Moore and in the 16th century, I believe to recall.

MOST people who knock communism, and MANY these idiots are, again are only, no more than being partialists; never telling the whole truth about communism. They may possibly be right with respect to one or two or some x number of cases of state communism and/or communism party (political), but these are specific and not reflective of the whole topic of communism. When meaning to refer to specific cases, then these should be clearly and explicitly identified; f.e., Stalinist or Maoist or Marxist Communism.

The North Vietnamese had a very healthy communism going, until the U.S. hellbent launched war of criminal aggression on them. And from what I read, the U.S. came to very much reduce that war and instead apply war of aggression against the South Vietnamese, whom the U.S. was supposedly fighting to defend.

Etc. There is regularly a LOT that people are OMISSIVE about, and omission is a way of LYING. It could be omission out of unchecked ignorance, so [incompetence] and lack of self-awareness and -control; but omission is often a method of lying that is very deliberately employed. The latter is also part of the set of tactics employed or employable in the "art of deception".

One of the instances of such tactics being employed is with ignorants and deliberately intended people pretend that the Old Testament is wholly reflective of the Word of God, which can't be true for true Christians, for it sure was not true for Jesus of Nazareth. After all, he said to STOP practicing some of the laws and possibly rites of the O.T., and one such law is that he explicitly said to terminate application of and belief in "eye for an eye", to instead leave vengence to God. True Christians believe that God is [immutable], so Jesus, if he's to be who Christians are supposed to believe he is anyway, well, he would not have said to stop doing anything God the Father commanded that His believers do. Believing that Jesus is who Christians are supposed to believe, I believe that he herein taught that NO, NOT all of the O.T. is reflective of God's will and way, that some of the contents of the O.T. instead are contrary, opposed to, ....

All that is required is for one case of proof, and the above is one, although only for true Christians; of course not applying to non-Christians, non-believers in Jesus ... in the Christian way, the truly Christian one that is, and not for false and arrogantly ignorant "Christians".

If we have one case of proof, then we, if we care to do so anyway, we have cause to look for additional cases, and those may be correctly discerned but while the cases are of the inferred, or (in logical lingo or lingo of logic) necessarily inferred, kind.

Yet Anon. pretends, ignorantly or maliciously, that the O.T. says all that he says it does, and as if there are no flaws in the O.T. Not a credible person is Anon. on this and plenty of the rest of what he or she posted.

This website is called Info. Liberation, so users should integrally try to work in this way; instead of trying to fill naive readers' minds with bogusness, nonsense, etc. When we respect readers of what we write, then we make sure to carefully provide the readers with truthfulness; and that means to be truthful about our own ignorance, limitations, ..., as well as to provide references to supporting and also contrasting resources.

People who don't do that are PROPAGANDISTS and disrespectful of their readers and/or listeners.

the incredible

Posted: Dec 01 2007, 7:29 AM

88147 Communism and democratie are both masonic creations. Which is made to divide their enemy's (normal people with consious and faith and let them fight each other. These systems were both created by international bankers who are mostly jewish esoteric people. Their final goal is the new world order which will made humanity suffer so that the anti christ can come as a saviour that's right as a saviour (hence the name false messiah) he will perform miracles, but these miracles will only be deception.

PS Google anatoly golistyn and you will have thousants of links
this message is adressed to professional debunker mike corbeil

Posted: Dec 17 2007, 9:31 PM

This is only my theory based on many others' works - so i am afraid i will have no references to links.
Cui Bono = Who benefits - ask that question whenever facts do not seem to lead to any conclusion.
What organization has the greatest wealth and power and physical presence and control over the most people? The ROMAN Catholic Church. It is very important to know the history of Rome - before it was an empire it was a kingdom; after The "empire" fell it was remade as a church.
The "Zeitgeist" movie has some startling facts about the origins of Churches and archetypes that even Joseph Campbell may not have realized. But even deeper than has been stated by these two are a grander scheme - it is the realm of Great Pirates. Buckminster Fuller wrote about the G.P.s in "An Operating Manual for the Spaceship Earth" - but other than fleshing out the concept of a "the" Meta-Power structure, little can be found in documentation.
It is tantamount to the constancy of hidden control that little is left for outsiders to use as proof of their existence - or as a possible gateway into their structure. The best cryptological system is to have NO information.
There are some that propose that there must be a cabal or a network of conspirators that rule the world - i believe it is more likely that there is maybe only one grand czar of the underworld. I and any other theorists are then left with little to use as verification of these schemes and ultimately "the penultimate schemer".
Furthermore - i propose that even religion is a veil that is created to separate the "pious" from the "investigative" populous. Eternal damnation does a fantastic job of making the flock behave - and it squashes any dissent with "justifiable" repudiation and punishment. It should be asked - if one's own "everlasting soul" will be punished for all time, why should there be any need to keep an unrepentant alive? Why put off the final judgment.
There is an overlord who rules with a golden fist - and as deputies there are any number of vicious, opportunistic henchmen to do the dirty works. Men are cruel - we are not that removed from the wild kingdom. Few wish to acknowledge, but killer whales are KILLERS. They even take bites of their prey before it is dead. We see them as giant smiling Seaworld attractions - but they are examples of where the real world shines "red in claw and tooth".
There was a time when many people where amazed at the theory proposed in "the Matrix" about reality - earlier philosophers studied "Plato's Cave". There is one telling line it that movie regarding whatisthematrix ? "It is control", sayeth Morpheus. The world is a simulacrum of some "realer" existence is allegorical - but it says more about how perception of the world defines one's reality of the world.
Have you ever convinced a person that there is no god? If they are convinced there is not - there is good reason that they had their suspicions and any arguments provided mere supporting argumentation. The sad truth is that most people become fixed in some way of thinking at an early age and mindlessly continue with their initial assumptions through-out their lives. That is why religion should not be taught to children - becoming "unplugged" at too late an age is not productive - and is more likely to cause trauma, psychosis or death for a fully indoctrinated mind.
The Meta-world relies on a mass of similarly controlled, unthinking robots to do work and create economic growth - freedom is for Hallmark moments and Boyscout badges - it is an ideal that has never really existed.
We live in a society of LAWS. Freedom requires minimal law and equatable law and just law. Society requires minimal resistance, equatable theories and "just do it" trademarks.
Yes it is true that there are international banks that control monies and markets and all levels of the economic farce, but there is a more ruthless control system that rules YOUR mind.

Posted: Jan 16 2008, 7:43 AM

75168 A very informative video.
The bottom line is... control of the people is achieved through control of critical resources. That is achieved through control of finance and information. The Federal Reserve system is the root of the problem(and the globalist entities that followed). The bloody and oppressive history that followed it's inception is no coincidence.
Their power is based on illusion, perception, to destroy it, all we have to do is refuse to cooperate. Inaction and apathy equals permission and consent.

Posted: Jan 17 2008, 10:53 PM

70105 A man named Jim Action has a GREAT plan and puts it all together.
FDIC Whistlblower

Posted: Jan 31 2008, 1:30 PM

71255 FDIC Whistleblower
Related To NSA
Classified Docs Case

By Wayne Madsen

WMR has discovered there is much more to the government's harassment of Kenneth W. Ford. Yolanda Gibson-Michaels, Ford's second cousin, to whom he is close, filed major fraud and conflict of interests charges against Donald E. Powell, the chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and a close political ally and friend of George W. Bush who served as President of First National Bank of Amarillo, Texas and Chairman of the Board of Regents of Texas A&M University.

Gibson-Michaels, a whistleblower who worked for the FDIC Legal Division, uncovered fraud involving senior FDIC officials and scandals involving Bank Hapoalim of Israel, Bank Leumi of Israel, Russian-Israeli mob figures Vladimir Guzinsky and Arkady Gaydamak (a financial partner of Cheney while he was at Halliburton), Bank Leumi's Chairman Eitan Raff, SunTrust Bank of Florida (the bank from where the FBI's confidential informant Tonya Tucker (who stung Ford) received checks while she was in the Washington area, the Washington Field Office of the FBI, illegal Congo diamond trading involving DRC Resources Corporation, massive overcharging of the FDIC by outside counsel law firms, Saudi lobbyists in Washington, the Wells Fargo-Tejas merger, Tyco International, Enron off shore entities, and Halliburton. WMR will bring more details about this massive fraud involving the FDIC, described as a $3 trillion slush fund for Bush, Cheney and their business friends and associates around the world.

Considering Ford's cousin's high profile FDIC investigation (also involving Securities and Exchange Commission probes) of politicians and businessmen connected to Bush, Cheney, and Israeli interests, perhaps David I. Salem, the U.S. Assistant Attorney who was so quick to see Kenneth Ford sent to prison, should also have any of his possible connections to the Bush White House, the GOP, and Israel thoroughly investigated for potential conflicts of interest and criminal conspiracy.

mindanao philipines

Posted: Apr 26 2008, 12:07 PM

222127 They're truthfully evil among the evils and most highlighted in fantasies. hopefully the involve of their wickedness may prosper and be progress in the lake of sulfur. 911 attack was made by those adventurer of wealth. proud to say that white or pretty whites skin are dominant "not all" but majority... yes, they're dominant in doing such decadence desires.

the land of honey and milk .................!!!!! ?????.

FYI.... time would come that land will become deserted. the curse of every innocent will turn your horror shadows.

your land would not be free anymore....!!!

thank you

Posted: Jun 23 2008, 4:39 PM

825 Hi all

Well Glad some of you folks have your heads screwed on or we would be all in the s**t here lol...

But i will say this. That if not all then near all top 'secret society' members from all over the world who are all in top level jobs or hold high positions in high places are called the "illuminati". which basically means; enlightened ones, again in essence meaning those who hold the secret knowledge of the seen and unseen worlds. They are deep into satanic rituals and pratice magical tricks and alow themselves to become possessed by the fallen ones who are devils and this illuminati are nothing but slaves unto them who were cast out from the higher universe or heaven to this one we live in today They where never angels as angels are obedient unlike the ginies/ jinn or mankind who have freewill the angels have know free will just like the rest of creation. The jinn and mankind are the only ones with freewill so what is freewill it's basically a decision made by ones self in ones heart....for all of the above know need for me to reference any of it why? there is enough info on the illuminati and on the religious level ask either a decent jewish scholar or a decent Christian scholar or a decent muslim scholar about these things if you dont believe in the spirit thing then you are what i call fishing stage so to help you go on you tube or google video and type in exiocism...but don't be affrair when you come to realise... they can't harm you if you hold fast to you belief and seek refuge with your true maker the one that gave you life trust me on this i know! not all of the genies are bad they live and believe similiar things to what we believe we just don't normally see them...right that done moving on to the ufo and uso business haha same really applies on the level technology wise we make things they make things unfortunate really i wouldn't mind having my own space especially with the price of enviromently dangerous oil based fuels but there you go here is a link to open your eye's on this matter nazi ufo's and this is who funded the nazi's and sorry to stur it up for us jews but the truth is we were not massacred by the nazi in the numbers we claimed know were near but the fact of the truth is we did an exodus on palastinian land mr zundel prove the concentration camp to be a lie and still that innocent man is away from his family in a german jail and here is a link for that right now this illuminati has robbed us of world resources and we are enslaved by there brain washing terror tactaic ie 9/11 was them watch this and osama bin laden is dead along time ago as comfirmed by the late benazzi bhutto they brain wash us all heavely relying on the media machine and using using threat of poverty on those who are wealthy if they don't comply and they have access to every governament and nongovernment agentcy worls over including the military and threaten to attack country's if they dont comply well this game has gone on since at least the dawn of time all they real enemy has done is change its name but in essence there stratagy has always been the same to stear you away from your Creator to worship something other than but you free willing poeples that you choose to make hope you all make the right one cause our own orbit is from and back to our maker and the illuminati cannot stop that....shalom
John Wallace

Posted: Nov 24 2008, 11:17 AM

209105 THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AND TACK’S TACKLE SHOP This is a rather long article about the Council on Foreign Relations and how I believe that it is a "front organization" for international bankers. If you would rather download the artcle to read at a later date, here is a link to it:
When I was growing up in the Inwood section of upper Manhattan, I remember when I was about 12 or 13 years old I had my first contact with discovering what a “front” was for another business. It was called Tack’s Tackle Shop. When it first opened, it looked like just another business. The guy in the store, Tack, was selling fishing rods, live bait and an array of fishing equipment. It didn’t take long before the kids in the neighborhood figured out that perhaps there was something else going on. The live bait in the window wasn’t alive anymore and local hoods and gangster type people seemed to be going in and out, particularly in the evenings and none of them looked like fishermen. It wasn’t long before the place was raided by the NYCPD and my friends and I all watched from across the street on Sherman Avenue as “Tack” came out in handcuffs along with a bunch of other men. We were later told that Tack’s Tackle Shop had actually been a front for an illegal gambling operation.

A “front group” can be any entity that is set up to appear to be a legitimate independent organization, like Tack’s Tackle Shop, when it is actually controlled from behind the scenes by another organization or group of individuals. These front groups are often legitimate businesses, social or political organizations, professional groups, advocacy groups, research organizations, etc. Organized crime has used legitimate front organizations for many decades to launder their income from various illegal activities. Pharmaceutical companies have used front organizations to advocate for the drugs they manufacture. International terrorist organizations have their front groups here in the United States and as the evidence clearly shows, so do the international bankers.

After researching the formation and activities of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) it appears that it may be a very sophisticated version of “Tack’s Tackle Shop.” The CFR was specifically set up to carry out the goals and objectives of international bankers so that the public positions taken by the CFR would appear to be independent positions that could not be directly connected to the international bankers who personally control and fund the CFR.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded in 1921 by a very select group of international bankers, Wall Street lawyers and wealthy “old money” families sometimes called the Establishment or the Elites. Among the CFR’s founders were JP Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, “Colonel” Edward House (Marxist. globalist and close advisor to President Wilson), Paul Warburg (international banker), Otto Kahn and Jacob Schiff (both international investment bankers). The CFR’s stated purpose at that time was to improve the understanding of US foreign policy and international affairs through the exchange of ideas. The select membership has been gradually expanded over the years, now totaling around 3,800 and includes various professionals, corporate CEO’s, college presidents, media owners and reporters, high-ranking government officials and even high ranking US military officers.

These same international bankers that started the CFR were instrumental in getting President Woodrow Wilson to sign the Federal Reserve Act into existence in 1913 that basically gave these international bankers the power to print money and control our entire economy. To show you the mind set of this core group, one of the founding CFR members, Edward House, authored a book in 1912 entitled “Philip Dru: Administrator” in which he laid out a fictionalized plan for the conquest of America. In the book, he told of a conspiracy by which a group of wealthy businessmen would gain control of both the Democratic and Republican parties and use them as instruments for the creation of a socialist world government.

After signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow Wilson later admitted, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country….(America is) no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." He was, of course, talking about the international bankers and the creation of the first great nationwide “front organization” called the Federal Reserve that was designed to directly benefit the international bankers at the expense of the American taxpayers.

The late Carroll Quigley (mentor and advisor to President Clinton) who was a long term member of the CFR, wrote in his book “Tragedy & Hope”: "The CFR is the American Branch of a society….which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, sounded the alarm about the real intent of the CFR and pointed out that there was two separate cliques within the CFR:

1. The first and most powerful clique wants to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States.

2. The second clique of international members is comprised of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents who want to receive a world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in control of global government.

Congressman John Rarick, a recipient of the Bronze Star and Purple Heart in World War II and a Democrat from Louisiana who once argued with his party over its increasing liberalism, said, "The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.”

By using the CFR as a front organization to push their globalist agenda for America and the world, the “Establishment Elites and International Bankers” have managed to gain significant influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of our government. They can not only advocate their new world order ideas from within the government by using their CFR members in high government positions, but they can also use individual CFR members and research groups financed by their non-profit foundations to bring pressure from another direction. The international bankers use this process to implement the step by step decisions that will gradually convert the US from a sovereign nation to a subservient position in the new world order run by appointed bureaucrats selected by the international bankers. The CFR is being used much in the same manner as “Tack’s Tackle Shop” was used by an organized criminal group. The international bankers behind the CFR want to give the public the outward appearance of legitimacy in order that they can slowly accomplish their illegal objectives to usurp the US Constitution and the sovereignty of this country.

Many of the most influential international bankers, Wall Street CEOs, politicians, academics and media owners and TV personalities are members of the CFR. They join the CFR for the same reasons that other people join similar business organizations: to make political or business contacts, to enjoy the prestige of being in the organization or to simply use their connections to make more money. The CFR in turn, uses the broad influence of these people and their organizations to slowly infiltrate their globalist ‘New World Order’ plans into American life. CFR members and their ghost writers author scholarly articles that are designed to specifically affect public opinion and future government decision making. These authors and researchers are oftentimes funded directly by one or more of the international bankers’ non-profit foundations. The CFR’s well paid academics expound on the wisdom of a united world and the CFR media members disseminate the message.

In the 1940’s, President Roosevelt began bringing CFR members into the State Department and they have dominated it ever since. CFR members were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations. The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John Mc Cloy and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss, who was later arrested as a spy for Russia. In all, the CFR sent at least forty-seven of its members in the United States delegation, effectively controlling the outcome.

These same CFR members were also instrumental in using our country’s new membership in the United Nations to create the concepts of “limited wars” and “police actions” that were designed to circumvent the US Constitution and permit an administration to send our troops to war without a formal Declaration of War. It should also be pointed out that these two concepts benefit the international bankers and large corporations most because they allow these entities to make huge profits by providing financing and/or equipment and products to the enemies of our country during the conflict. It definitely did not benefit the US military men and women who were wounded or died in these conflicts. If a Declaration of War was declared, these same bankers and corporation CEO’s would be charged with treason for aiding the enemy during a time of war.

James Warburg, a CFR member and son of CFR founder Paul Warburg testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, defiantly telling the Senators that: “We shall have world government, whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”

On November 25, 1959, the Council on Foreign Relations published “Study No. 7”, which openly declared its true purpose to bring about a New World Order through the manipulation of U.S. foreign policy and through international economic interdependence:

· "...building a New International Order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic international order [code for world government]...including states labeling themselves as 'Socialist.' "

The plan for the New World Order and the ultimate control of America by the international bankers, was clearly outlined once again in the April 1974 issue of “Foreign Affairs” the Council of Foreign Relations’ own publication, when CFR member and former Secretary of State Richard N. Gardner, wrote an article entitled “The Hard Road to World Order” in which he stated:

· “In short, the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault…” one way to garner public support for new international treaties would be to propagandize world wide predicaments. If people are scared of terrorism, financial chaos or global warming, they will be willing to cede their national sovereignty, freedom and liberties for global authority.”

Since the FDR administration, all transition teams and administrations have been full of CFR members. It didn’t matter whether they were liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican. The Nixon administration had over 115 CFR members all in key Executive branch positions, most of who continued into the Ford years. Ronald Reagan wasn’t a CFR member, but his Vice President George HW Bush was a CFR member, and so were 28 members of his transition team alone. The Clinton administration had over 150 CFR members in key executive positions. George W. Bush is not a CFR member either, but his father and uncle are, his Vice President Dick Cheney is, and his administration is swarming with CFR members. The incoming Obama administration’s transition team is packed with CFR members and he is already looking to staff many of its administration’s key executive branch positions with CFR members.

Did you vote for change in the 2008 Election? If you did, here’s a partial list of Mr. Obama’s transition team:

Susan E. Rice – (CFR) former State Department Asst Secretary for African Affairs; Anthony Lake (CFR) – Bill Clinton’s first national Security advisor; Zbigniew Brzezinski – (CFR) and Trilateral Commission - Brzezinski is widely seen as the man who created Al Qaeda, and was involved in the Carter Administration plan to give arms, funding and training to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan; Richard Clarke (CFR) - Former chief counter-terrorism adviser on the U.S. National Security Council under Bush; Robert W. Kagan (CFR) argues that interventionism is a bipartisan affair that should be undertaken with the approval of our democratic allies; Dennis B. Ross (CFR) and Trilateral Commission - Served as the director for policy planning in the State Department under President George H. W. Bush and special Middle East coordinator under President Bill Clinton; Lawrence J. Korb (CFR) - Director of National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. Has criticized manor of the invasion of Iraq but has detailed plans to increase the manpower of the United States Army to fight the war on terror and to "spread liberal democratic values throughout the Middle East"; Bruce Reidel (CFR) - Former CIA analyst who wishes to expand the war on terror to fight Al Qaeda across the globe. Considered to be the reason behind Barack Obama’s Hawkish views on Pakistan and his Pro India leanings on Kashmir; Stephen E. Flynn (CFR) - Has been attributed with the idea for Obama’s much vaunted "Civilian Security Force". Flynn has written: "The United States should roughly replicate the Federal Reserve model by creating a Federal Security Reserve System (FSRS) with a national board of governors, 10 regional Homeland Security Districts, and 92 local branches called Metropolitan Anti-Terrorism Committees”; and Madeline Albright (CFR) and Brookings - Currently serves on the Council on Foreign Relations Board of directors and was Former Secretary of State and US Ambassador to the United Nations under Clinton.

Here’s the list of possible cabinet positions in the new administration: James B. Steinberg – CFR and the Trilateral Commission; Chuck Hagel (R) – (CFR); Robert M Gates – (CFR), Hillary Clinton – Husband Bill is a CFR member; Bill Richardson (CFR); Sen John Kerry (D) (CFR); Susan Rice (CFR); Robert Rubin (CFR); Lawrence Summers (CFR); Timothy Geithner (CFR); Paul A. Volcker (CFR); David L. Boren (CFR); Thomas H. Kean (CFR); Gary Hart (CFR), and Jane Harman (CFR) – Defense Department Special Counsel (1979).

At time of writing of this article, President-elect Barack Obama's has apparently selected Arizona Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano as secretary of Homeland Security; Timothy Geithner, the current New York Federal Reserve head, as the Secretary of the Treasury; and Texas Democratic Gov. William Richardson as the Secretary of Commerce. Guess what? They are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations. So much for change!

What do Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer, Marvin Kalb, Diane Sawyer, Andrea Mitchell and Tom Brokaw have in common? Answer: They are all members of the CFR.

What does the NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street journal, LA Times, Boston Globe, Baltomor Sun, Chicage Sun-Times, Houston Post, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Arkansas Gazette, DesMoine Register and Tribune, Louisville Courier, the AP, UPI, Reuters, the Gannett Co, Walt Disney, ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox Networks, Clear Channel have in common: Answer: They are all members of the CFR.

Freedom of the press has always been vital to the preservation of our American Republic. Ever since the early years of our country, it was the American “free press” that stood tall between us and the crooked international bankers, industrialists and corrupt government officials. While some of the major newspapers in the big cities were controlled by establishment types like William Randolph Hearst, who definitely influenced the content, most of the newspaper owners and reporters were independent and honorable people who chose to keep their integrity by pursuing the truth. Most local newspapers, radio stations, and later on TV stations, were owned locally.

As they grow larger and eliminate their competition, major media corporations and international bankers are choosing what you will see on the nightly news while trying to trick you into believing it is unbiased reporting. The very news stories that you are fed by the mainstream media are manipulated to mirror the public relations campaigns of corporations, international bankers and even their favorite presidential candidates. If this is not the case then why, during the course of the 2008 election, was there no mention of the issues that were important to Americans: the threat by big government to our freedoms, liberties and sovereignty; the actions of the Federal Reserve and the issuance of fiat money; the drugging of 6 million of our nation’s youth; or amnesty for illegal aliens. Popular candidates like Ron Paul were either ignored by the media, excluded from most of the TV debates, or asked fewer questions than their CFR candidate counterparts. Of the top twenty media corporations in the U.S, 18 are members of the CFR.

The CFR's strategy is to use their members in the media to promote the need for world government in order to fight international threats like global warming. Both Obama and McCain made the environment a major issue in the campaign, but avoided mentioning the immigration issue. The CFR has long identified the worldwide environmental movement as a means to advance its agenda and has even suggested a global tax on all developed nations, payable to the United Nations of course. Most of the major media companies are now controlled by individuals or organizations that are members of the CFR, including the international bankers. One of the techniques used by the CFR and its membership has been to manipulate the news in such as way as to push their internationalist views on the rest of us.

As the big media corporations keep merging into larger and more powerful companies, they will be able to control public opinion as never before. With their friends in congress and in key government agencies, all the international bankers and their CFR members need to do is advocate bringing back the “Fairness Doctrine” and regulating the internet and their control of the media will be complete.

The average American might find the CFR’s powerful influence over America's government very difficult to understand or believe, but never forget that the CFR was founded by international bankers for the express purpose of bringing about socialism and world government. It is the deliberate plan of these international bankers, who hide in the shadows and pull the strings of their marionettes, to gradually increase their influence and domination over America’s domestic and foreign affairs. CFR members have been in control of our government since the 1940’s. If CFR members are supposed to be the nation’s best and brightest in running the federal government and overseeing foreign affairs, why is the country in such a mess under their eighty year watch? The answer is: That’s the plan.

The international bankers behind the Federal Reserve and the CFR are deliberately trying to usurp the US Constitution and gradually destroy our freedoms, liberties and sovereignty in the process. They are using the Federal Reserve System to bankrupt the country so we will be at their mercy. The deeper in debt our country goes, the richer and more powerful these international bankers become. If action is not taken to take back control of our nation’s currency from the criminals in the private international banking cartel and if the CFR’s influence over the highest levels of our federal government isn't soon broken, America will be reduced to a third world nation controlled by a socialistic world government where our freedoms and liberties would have disappeared and our national sovereignty is but a fond memory.

Many Americans believe that we may have reached a point where it no longer matters which party or candidate wins the election, because both candidates are already beholden to special interest groups and the winner will staff the high level executive positions with CFR members.

The activities of the international bankers behind the Council on Foreign Relations and the Federal Reserve should be thoroughly investigated by an independent prosecutor. If criminal activities are uncovered, then those involved should be prosecuted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) as an ongoing criminal conspiracy. The American people must not give up their liberties for the false sense of security offered by the international bankers and their CFR puppets. The grip of these international criminals must be broken and the threats against our liberties, freedoms and our nation’s sovereignty must be eliminated. It can only be accomplished by a demand for action by a determined and educated American citizenry, as well as by an honest and thorough federal criminal investigation.

I close this article with a quote from David Rockefeller, the former Chairman and the current Honorary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relation and ask you to consider the implications of what he has said:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

- David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 Baden, Germany



New York Campaign for Liberty


Posted: Nov 29 2008, 2:23 AM

6595 I read the Hard Road to World Order and the second part of that quote is not in it.
I'm also pretty sure the second part of the Rockefeller quote is fake as well, though I don't think there's a good source anywhere...
I agree people need a wake-up call, but fighting ignorance with misinformation is not the answer.

Posted: Dec 03 2008, 7:08 PM

205247 Fact is America was blessed above other countries because they first believed in God the CORRECT way - they believed Jesus is God and no other way (not Mary etc.) America started to prosper and become AMERICA when the slaves were brought here in the 1600s and America got very rich and was growing - Europe and other countries were doing very poorly and many heard about America and found way to get over here. The whites gave them land, jobs, money (the Blacks built most of the wealth and were not allowed to enjoy it) Other countries suffered because they did not believe correctly or do right and they excepted Socialism and Communism and lived from paycheck to paycheck because they let their government do that to them - NOT Americas fault. The problem with America going to the craps now is because they didn't want to give up that evil racism with Black America and they opened the door for foreign Europeans to migrate from poverty over here and they gave wealth to them instead. The immigrants brought false religions and atheism in this country while they were living off America's wealth. Some immigrants adapted to the ways of this country while most did not and now these same people are now in government and own companies (that do no belong to them) and they are stealing money and making sure foreign countries get power and America's money. America is not required to give to others because others did not have a good life - you make your bed you lie in it. No other countries could destroy America - America is being destroyed within. There is no recession or economy problem in America - there is just thieves and liars and fake Americans who want to give third world persons and foreign countries our money and destroy America's power and standing and take away our uniqueness and power - and Stupid Americans are letting them do it. But that's why God has a great terrible judgement coming - PAYBACK is coming!!!
just us

Posted: Dec 28 2009, 4:03 AM

207216 what is destroying america is it is using million dollar bombs to destroy two bit conspiracies around the world. quit trying to be policeman of the world. find a replacement for oil. use bluegreen algae and waste manure. when oil goes back to its natural value terrorists will have to go back to work. people who work for their money don`t waste it or themselves

Posted: May 10 2014, 11:49 AM

98174 read the opening charter of the united nation, and read unesco 356, because of the usa signing on to it, it brought social study's in the
class room, history was revised to fit into UN. one world government
agenda, to create an international student, that are B.F. skinner stimulus
response wind up toy's. The fix was in along time ago. THe only way is
to stop supporting the usa. reserve currency status , convert usa dollars
to foreign currency, store them in a safety deposite box at you bank, beside's the the interest rate in your saving account is paltry .
Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Muslim Woman Explains How The Mosque Obama Spoke At Treats Women (Hint: It's Not Good) - 02/04NYPD Cop Wins $15m After Fellow Cops Falsely Arrested & Beat Him At His Daughter's Birthday - 02/04Retired Cop Gets Taste Of Police State After Officers Bust In, Assault Him - 02/04Paul Joseph Watson And Stefan Molyneux On The Real Agenda Behind The Migrant Crisis - 02/04Hillary Clinton Suggests She Can't Be Part Of The Establishment Because She Is A Woman - 02/04NYPD Cop, Whose Job Was to Bust Prostitutes, Exposed as a Pimp in Massive Sex Trafficking Ring - 02/04Miami Police Retaliate Against Female Driver Who Filmed Herself Pulling Over Cop - 02/05TCU Professor Calls Police On Disabled Student Veteran Over Dissenting Opinion - 02/04

Cop Who Sought Photos of Teen's Erection in Sexting Case Commits Suicide Moments Before Arrest
Texas Man Sues After His Truck Seen Being Driven By Jihadi Fighters
When "Rescuers" Become a Death Squad: The Killing of Michael FunkHow Hillary Clinton Abused Her State Department Role to Help Her Hedge Funder Son-in-LawCops Fighting Mandatory Drug Tests -- Claim It's 'Unconstitutional' to Screen Police UrineNumber of Cops Charged With Murder Or Manslaughter Triples In One YearGood News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects