DOJ Tells Judges They Don't Get A Say In Whether Information Is ClassifiedBy Cory DoctorowBoing Boing May. 09, 2015 |
Mike Johnson Pushes Debunked Lie That Israeli Babies Were 'Cooked in Ovens' On October 7
'Sniper Seen on Roof Overlooking Pro-Palestine Protest' at Indiana University
'It Has to Be Stopped': Netanyahu Demands Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Colleges Be Shut Down
'These Protesters Belong in Jail': Gov. Abbott Cheers Arrest of Pro-Palestine Protesters at UT Austin
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
DOJ lawyer Catherine Dorsey: "We don't think there is a First Amendment right to classified documents" -- she was seeking to suppress evidence of force-feeding torture in Gitmo. She was speaking on behalf of the "most transparent administration in history (TM)." The judges at the D.C. Court of Appeals appeared skeptical. Chief Judge Merrick Garland characterized the government's position as tantamount to claiming the court "has absolutely no authority" to unseal evidence even if it's clear the government's bid to keep it secret is based on "irrationality" or that it's "hiding something."U.S. Government: We Can Classify Anything and Judges Can't Stop Us [Sam Sacks/The Intercept] |