The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Feb 16 2014, 3:17 PM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: Logan Albright Print

Free Speech and the Police

by Logan Albright

The traffic cop stands alone as one of the most unpleasant and unnecessary forms of law enforcement. Under the halfhearted guise of protecting public safety a pretense that no one really buys into these government agents spend most of their time extracting revenue from motorists for violating arbitrary and unscientific standards, and who are for the most part posing no significant risk to anyone.

Still, it is one thing when a passing policeman happens to witness a traffic violation and takes action to correct it, and quite another when he lays a deliberate trap to catch unwary drivers a sneaky and, it seems to me, rather unsporting way of conducting the business of law enforcement.

Even worse, however, is when the same officers lying in wait to spring one of these speed traps attempt to penalize an honest citizen who, apart from following the law himself, encouraged others to do the same. This was the situation in Missouri when good Samaritan Michael Elli faced a fine of $1000 for flashing his headlights in order to warn drivers of an upcoming speed trap.

It's a little baffling how, in any sense, such an action could possibly be considered a crime. After all, the effect of Elli's actions was undoubtedly to reduce speeding, as drivers slowed to avoid getting ticketed by police. If the purpose of speed limits is to promote safety, then surely what Elli did must be considered a public service, mustn't it?

Of course, the existence of such a fine indicates in no uncertain terms that public safety is not, in fact, the goal behind most traffic laws. The only explanation for why police should be upset about the warning is that their department was deprived of the revenue from ticketing those caught in the speed trap. Speed traps have nothing to do with making us safer, and everything to do with taking our money.

Thankfully, a federal judge has since ruled that Elli's punishment cannot legally be enforced. After all, the only action the man engaged in was communicating information to others, a form of speech protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

It is unquestionably the right call, but the fact that it even had to be made is troubling in itself. In a less enlightened case, last year, a man was sentenced to eight months in prison for teaching people how to beat polygraph tests, even though they are a grossly flawed form of evidence not admissible in any court of law.

The fact that law enforcement officials think it is appropriate, not only to entrap people for minor traffic violations that infringe upon the rights of no one, but to forcefully punish a man for actually reducing criminal activity, is a sad commentary on the true agenda of our supposed protectors.

More knowledge is always in the interests of freedom, and speech, whether it be expressed verbally, through writing, over the internet or even in the form of flashing lights, is how knowledge is spread. We should always be highly suspicious of any efforts by the state to limit speech, and by extension the spread of knowledge.

The function of law enforcement it's only proper function is the protection of individual rights. When the law is used to harass, to bully, to squash the spread of information and to extract money from the citizenry so that the government can spend it, it ceases to be about protection and becomes instead a tool of oppression.
Logan Albright is a writer and economist in Washington, DC.

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct
- Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free
- Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects
- 'War On Cops': Cop Stages Fake Shootout, Sets Own Cruiser On Fire, Calls In Bomb Threat to School
- Cop Caught Stealing Cash & Gold Chain From Dying Crash Victim Loses Pension
- Innocent Man Beaten By Cops After Being Mistook For Suspect Now Paralyzed
- Ex-CIA Director Wants Snowden 'Hanged By The Neck Until He's Dead'
- Police as Prey: What a Real "War On Cops" Looks Like

Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Feb 16 2014, 5:21 PM

174254 <The function of law enforcement the protection of individual rights.> - Logan Albright

More contradictions.... Who are the individuals, that the police are protecting "rights" for?
Police are employed by the state, they enforce the state's laws, and, their job title does not even exist, without a system of law; (brought about by government / the state). Needless to say, the notion that police protect "individual rights," is nonsense, when speaking on behalf of the masses. And, when applied to the *rules of logic* the notion is completely obliterated, for "rights" are inherent; cannot be protected, nor, written-up by statutes.

The government is running low on cons, this story speaks to that. I suppose this means, Obama's head is on the chopping block again? It astounds me, the lengths government will go to, in order to avoid the truth; especially, with all the chemical and mind-busting weaponry they have at their disposal.

Posted: Feb 16 2014, 6:50 PM

99132 Do you have these symotoms?

Learn More >>




Posted: Feb 17 2014, 2:02 AM

174240 @99132, do you have a link?

If government were to simply rid themselves of exceptions, people like you, and, your offspring, would regress to the primal herd, would they not? I'm not opposed to letting human beings disband and regress; seems like the right thing to do, in my view anyways, however, before you throw in your 2 cents ("1 cent" actually, for your mirror is synthetic) you might consider the implications to your own position on the hierarchy.

Posted: Feb 18 2014, 3:13 PM

108242 The government is US. Not them. So in essence, we allow this to continue. We have the power to stop it, if we chose not to be afraid anymore. Police are not even Constitutionally authorized, deputies/Sheriff's are, but not police officers. So why do we allow them? Because we're idiots for not doing our homework and then getting rid of them, by force. You can't vote out bureaucrats, which is what cops are, street-level ones, but bureaucrats nonetheless whose allegiance is to the government who pays it's paycheck (us really) and to the unions who protect their asses. Cops aren't needed & society could get along just fine without them.

Posted: Feb 21 2014, 11:49 PM

10842 @108242, "The government is US." Forgive my rudeness here, but "US" is both a group word, and, an acronym for: United States; neither of which, I ever agreed to play a part in. There's more to this site *than meets eye* - similar to the "Transformer's" theme song.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects - 11/23Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend' - 11/24Family Gets $4.9m After Cops Beat Mentally Ill Son to Death On Video and Walked Free - 11/24Undercover Cop Dressed In All Black Shot While Placing GPS Tracker On Car - 11/20NJ Cop Says He Was Suspended After Blowing Whistle On Dept. Misconduct - 11/24WeAreChange Blocked in France Because of New Censorship Law - 11/24VIDEO: Hillary Fans Voice Support For Her 'Plan to Repeal 4th Amendment' - 11/24AZ State Supreme Court Rules Cannabis In The Blood Does Not Constitute Impairment - 11/24

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up