informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jul 18 2013, 12:28 PM Category: Commentary Source: Anthony Gregory Print

The War on Terror Is a War on American Freedom

By Anthony Gregory

In the aftermath of 9/11, President George W. Bush guided the Patriot Act through Congress, unilaterally expanded surveillance of Americans, amplified executive detention authority and took other dramatic measures that shifted the balance between liberty and government power significantly, in the name of national security.

After the initial Patriot Act was passed, many Democrats perceived the growing threat to civil liberties and started to have misgivings. Now, five years into the Obama presidency enthusiasm for these measures seems to be bipartisan.

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama in 2007 and 2008 argued that sacrificing liberties in the name of anti-terrorism posed long-term risks. He condemned military commissions and violations of habeas corpus as serious threats to “the great traditions of our legal system and our way of life.” He called the Patriot Act “shoddy” and “dangerous.”

Senator Obama sharply criticized President Bush’s surveillance policies as going beyond the boundaries of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment. He vowed that if elected he would run an administration of unprecedented transparency and vigorously protect whistleblowers.

President Obama’s deeds have not matched Senator Obama’s words. Indeed, he has raised the stakes.

He promised to close Guantanamo by January 2010, but instead slowed down releases from Guantanamo and vastly expanded the prison camp at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.

In 2009, he announced a policy of “prolonged detention,” ensuring indefinite imprisonment for detainees, including those against whom the U.S. government had no evidence of wrongdoing. In 2011, he signed the renewal of the Patriot Act. He has increased the role of unmanned drones and claims the authority to order a strike against any suspected terrorist: no trial necessary.

He also has expanded the surveillance operations of the National Security Agency (NSA), monitoring phone and internet traffic in a seemingly indiscriminate manner. The full extent is uncertain, but the goal is “total information awareness,” an idea floated shortly after 9/11.

The agency spies not just on Americans, but on residents of U.S. allies and other friendly countries. Germany, where President Obama has enjoyed high popularity, has protested particularly loudly, knowing well the dangers of totalitarian surveillance powers.

The administration also has spied on reporters, and Attorney General Eric Holder signed an arrest warrant for Fox News correspondent James Rosen over normal journalistic behavior.

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden exposed the agency’s vast surveillance program. Instead of affording him whistleblower protections, the administration now wants to imprison him.

In fact, the current administration has used the Espionage Act against whistleblowers more than all previous administrations combined. And to prevent future whistle-blowing, the White House is encouraging federal employees to spy on one another.

Our Democratic law professor president, a self-described progressive, has created a perfect storm. Ten years ago, liberals screamed because the Republican administration took note of what patrons checked out at the library. Today, they seem much more complacent in the face of more intimate forms of mass surveillance.

Democrats once talked about prosecuting executive officials for wrongdoing. Today they muse about whether the government should jail journalists like Glenn Greenwald, U.S. columnist for the British newspaper, the Guardian, merely for providing a soapbox for whistleblowers.

The president has announced that the “war on terror” is all but over. We need a new approach to the threat. If the war on terror is being ended, the extraordinary measures that threaten our personal liberties also should be ended.

Some say that foreign terrorists hate the United States for its freedom. This seems oversimplified at best. But if it’s true, America’s enemies must love what U.S. leaders have done in the nearly 12 years since 9/11.

The question isn’t about balancing freedom and security. Determined terrorists can always take lives. But only our politicians, with our acquiescence, can take our freedoms._
Anthony Gregory is Research Fellow at The Independent Institute. His articles have appeared in the Christian Science Monitor, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, San Diego Union-Tribune, Portland Oregonian (AZ), Contra Costa Times, The Star (Chicago, IL), Washington Times, Salt Lake Tribune, Tallahassee Democrat, Albany (NY) Times Union, Raleigh News and Observer, Florida Today, and other newspapers.





Latest Commentary
- Perpetual Fear Under Empire
- Would Appointing a War Criminal as Commissioner Redeem the NFL?
- Barack Obama: Terrorist
- Russell Brand: Will Obama's Bombs Stop Beheadings?
- Shorter Obama War Speech... The Top Five List
- Obama Follows Bush's Iraq Playbook
- 'Obama Snubbed at Top Golf Clubs'
- Drug Warriors Claim Colorado Going to Pot









Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dougo

Posted: Jul 18 2013, 6:21 PM

Link
170213 It was all just an end run around the Constitution and bill of rights to begin with.It was an illusion used to get at our own citizens here in the U.S..
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 19 2013, 1:41 AM

Link
174240 Isn't any war, a war on freedom?

Dave asked me about war one time - what I thought of it, what it accomplished, who started them.... I didn't respond to his questions with my own thoughts, nor, did I respond with the programmed answers - I was still trying to balance both worlds at that time, but, that's what "they" want - a continuous cycle, perpetual war, (I know they call it something other than, what I know it as:) thermal equilibrium, the "spin machine," is their objective.

War... Kills innocent people, conquers nations, sacrifices children to Chaos, (for those who are "religious") but, it never brings peace nor, freedom. "War" is a contradiction to both those words: "peace," and, "freedom".

I'm a "terrorist," according to the government, though, I don't see myself in that manner. I'm merely living-proof of what happens, when mortals try to take the place of gods; (especially, mortals who who lack the Back Bone, [or, vertebrate] to let humankind make decisions for themsves). Just stand back and watch these self-proclaimed "living gods" fall. They're doing a fine job of fucking everything up, I would say.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 19 2013, 1:56 AM

Link
174240 dougo, the word: "citizen," implies ownership. humankind is indigenous to planet earth - not born to, nor, bound to, laws written by Mortal Men; (less than 'mortal men,' in my view).


The (CON)stitution begins w/ the word: "con," for a reason.

As for "The Bill of Rights".... What is a bill? And, "Rights," are inherent, not granted by a piece of paper, with dead men's signatures on it. (What mind-f**k we've be programmed to believe....)
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 19 2013, 3:23 AM

Link
174240 dougo, I've been meaning to ask you: what do think of meta physics? The corelation between meta physics and the ethereal realm, is quite something, wouldn't you agree? Imagine, being able to be in two places at once....

What if a real-life person were able to accomplish such a feat, without the government's aid / instruction? Nietchze would have called such s person an "exception," right?

Standing in other people's shoes is quite something, only, I've tried to stand in yours, and I keep coming-up blank. That can only mean one of two things: you're either willingly ignorant, or, you're not "real."


If I were to play "anagrams," or, "numerolgy" with your name, wonder what I'd come up with?


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Judge Says Raid On Twitter User Perfectly Fine Because Officers Can Enforce Non-Existent Laws Provided They Have 'Probable Cause' - 09/22Is that a Drill Sergeant or a Police Officer? Belligerent Cop Loses it On Man for Knowing His Rights - 09/22Former Cop, Infamous for Killing a Family's Dog, Has Epiphany About the Broken Police System - 09/22Elizabeth Warren Says US Has "No Future" If Free-Market Embraced - 09/22Baltimore Cop Suspended after Video Showing him Punching Man Proves he Lied in Report - 09/22Innocent Grandmother Shot During Violent DEA Drug Raid in New Hampshire - 09/22Judge Beverly J. Woodard - 09/22"We Have Been a Paramilitary Organization": How the Police Talk When They Think We're Not Listening - 09/21

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top