informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 21 2013, 2:57 PM Category: Politics/Corruption Source: Reason Print

Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Washington, D.C.'s Civil Forfeiture Racket


Jerrie Brathwaite was not in her car when Washington, D.C. police seized it in January 2012. She had lent her 2000 Nissan Maxima to a friend, and that friend was pulled over, searched, and found to be in possession of drugs. A year later, Braithwaite—who has never been charged with a crime—still doesn’t have her car back, and no one from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) will return her calls.

Full Article »





Latest Politics/Corruption
- D.A.R.E. Gets Duped By Anti-Pot Satire
- Homeland Security Chief Admits He Doesn't Understand 4th Amendment
- The Exposure Of CIA Torture Is Finally Costing Someone A Job: Former Senate Staffer Alissa Starzak
- Judge Responds To Ross Ulbricht's Request For A New Trial: Ha Ha Ha Ha, No.
- Obama Secretly Loosened Standards for Drone Killings in Pakistan
- Slap-on-the-Wrist Sentence for Petraeus Reveals 'Leak Prosecution Double Standard'
- Rand Paul Was Against The Drug War Before He Was For It
- 'Bloggers' Compared to ISIS During Congressional Hearing









Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 22 2013, 5:15 AM

Link
20138 Pretty sleazy. The automobile was in no way connected to the possession. For that matter, does that mean if they caught someone in possession of some pot on the subway, they could seize the subway car? Can WE citizens do that too?
In fact, subway cars, busses, etc. are all used in commission of crimes, when robbers use them to rob people in them.
Where exactly does this warped logic stop? Does no one anymore remember the concept of "conflict of interest", where police departments depend on ILLEGALLY (per the constitution) confiscated goods to supplement thier own budget, and no limit on the amount (I mean traffic tickets have always been a little iffy here too, but at least no one is issuing one for 130,000 dollars, but they can seize that much if someone had it) is direct conflict of interest.
Someone ought to challenge this in court.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 23 2013, 12:22 AM

Link
9885 Sounds like a racketeering extortion scandal on the innocent who try to get their belonging back, but since it's already held, they can ignore all calls and sell the property anyways and make the money they make by not answering telephone calls from those trying to get their property back. Makes perfect sense to me why they won;t answer, they make more money for not answering and stealing you property. The police have shown us that they are becoming the crooks, by doing the things that they are getting caught doing!


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Who Pays When The DEA Destroys Your Vehicle And Kills Your Employee During A Botched Sting? Hint: Not The DEA - 05/02IRS Seizes $107,000 From Innocent Small-Town Convenience Store Owner For 'Structuring' Deposits - 05/02Florida Cop Fired After Video Shows him Unload AR-15 on Fleeing Man that He Couldn't Even See - 05/04"Nickel Rides," "Houdini Suicides," and the American Torture State - 05/04Atlanta Cops Kill Woman, Say She Fired on them While Handcuffed in Back of Patrol Car - 05/04Sheriff Shoots Real Estate Agent As She Shows House, Then Walks Away Because "He's The Sheriff" - 05/05Two Videos of the Same Arrest in Baltimore Shows How MSM Does Not Give You the Whole Truth - 05/04New Jersey Cops May Not Order Passengers Out Of Car - 05/04

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top