US Supreme Court Considers Forced Blood Draw From Motorists

Oral arguments heard in US Supreme Court case that could allow nationwide use of forced, warrantless blood draws in DUI cases.

The nation's highest court on Wednesday considered whether police should be able to forcibly draw the blood of a motorist without a warrant. Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments in the case of Missouri v. McNeely to decide whether Tyler McNeely's constitutional rights were violated when he was taken to a hospital for a blood draw after a state patrolman accused him of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in October 2010.

"The issue in this case is whether the state may stick a needle in the arm of everyone arrested on suspicion of drunk driving without a warrant and without consent," McNeely's lawyer, Steven R. Shapiro, argued. "Missouri's answer to that question is yes, even in routine DWI cases like this and regardless of how quickly and easily a warrant could be obtained."

Full Article ť

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- NYPD Cop Arrests Man for Photographing Police Station from Public Sidewalk
- Chicago Police Kill Fleeing Man in "Drug Area"
- Jail Guards Turn Women's Prison Into Their Personal Sex Dungeon
- Louisiana: Cops Used Red Light Cameras For Personal Profit
- Judge's Handyman Cops Plea in Georgia Sex, Drugs, Frame-Up
- The Supreme Court Decided Your Silence Can Be Used Against You
- Eyewitnesses describe the terror of DWI checkpoint shooting
- California Deputy Detains Man for Video Recording Arrest, Accusing him of Possibly Plotting Murder

Comments

Add Comment

Page 1 of 1

dougo

Posted: Jan 14 2013, 10:55 AM

Link

687

if all else fails.2nd amendment.

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy