informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Nov 06 2012, 5:36 AM Category: Commentary Source: Caleb McMillan Print

But Who Will Build The Roads?

by Caleb McMillan

One of my favourite movies is Mike Judge’s Office Space. For those who haven’t seen it, I won’t spoil anything. The only reason I bring it up is because there’s a scene where a character named Tom Smykowski is, essentially, being interviewed for the job he already has. It seems that Tom’s job consists of being a middle man between customers and engineers. Here’s a sample of the scene. Somebody has created a meme for this scene, replacing the customer with the tax-payer and Tom’s role with the government.



In the spirit of this meme, I’d like to address the idea that somehow the “private sector” is unable to build the roads, airports, bridges, sewers, dams, ports, nuclear power plants and all the other “essential” services the state has monopolized.

Really think about this argument for a moment. Millions of individuals associating with each other are unable to coordinate a plan to lay down slabs of pavement connecting point a with point b. No, individuals acting as entrepreneurs cannot exchange with each other to accommodate consumer interests. The process of creating a road requires a territorial monopoly that forces money from the general public. This monopoly must then pick and choose which construction companies will build the roads, the quantity of roads and the whereabouts of these roads. Clearly, and I’m being sarcastic here, slabs of pavement or gravel paths cannot be left to the whims of voluntary association and exchange. A system predicated on violence is required.

Perhaps insufficient capital is the problem? For this is the common argument I hear: the benefit of forced payment is that it allows for a large accumulation of capital impossible under a free system of competitive entrepreneurs.

But this argument rests on two fallacies. One being the obvious notion that government capital is an oxymoron. Capital indicates there was some sort of saving on the part of the individual or group. Capital forms when consumption is restricted; there are no “savings” within government. There cannot be any real “government capital,” as the government only taxes and spends. Even if the government merely “collects” and doesn’t spend the loot, this is no more capital accumulation than a thief that robs a bank and then stuffs the money under his mattress instead of immediately consuming it.

The second fallacy regarding the argument that the private sector lacks the appropriate capital to finance projects such as roads, is the belief in homogeneous capital. This is popular among Keynesians, but it is in stark contrast to reality. Capital is an intricate complex order of goods interlocked in complementary structures. For one to say that business, whether large or small, lack the sufficient capital to build roads (or etc.) is a pretense of knowledge. Who’s to say how much or what kind of capital is required for roads? In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Hayek said,
Unlike the position that exists in the physical sciences, in economics and other disciplines that deal with essentially complex phenomena, the aspects of the events to be accounted for about which we can get quantitative data are necessarily limited and may not include the important ones. While in the physical sciences it is generally assumed, probably with good reason, that any important factor which determines the observed events will itself be directly observable and measurable, in the study of such complex phenomena as the market, which depend on the actions of many individuals, all the circumstances which will determine the outcome of a process, for reasons which I shall explain later, will hardly ever be fully known or measurable.
Millions of individuals with subjective preferences exchange with each other and by doing so, an objective price mechanism arises. Entrepreneurs use this price mechanism to determine how best to allocate scarce resources to meet consumer demand. Competition among entrepreneurs weeds out the ineffective thus awarding the consumer with efficiency. This process, known as the free market, has created a standard of living unimaginable for even the wealthiest of centuries past. This process changed computers from large expensive glorified calculators to small hand-held devices affordable to virtually everyone. The market process created a world where food comes all in varieties and in abundance for a low price. Contrast this to the development of computers and grocery stores in societies where the state owned the means of production. State ownership in roads and other “essentials” retard the technological development inherent in the free market.

When asked, “who will build the roads?” I’m often inclined to say, “I don’t know.” This usually creates a sense of triumph in the opposing party, that the admission of “I don’t know” confirms their suspicion that the market is inferior to state coercion. But “I don’t know” isn’t an admission of defeat, but rather, an admission that I can’t predict the market process. I was eight years old when my family got our first computer; I remember it clearly but in no way could I have predicted what the future of computers would hold. The same is true for roads and other infrastructure thought only to be capable by a territorial monopoly. I can’t predict what roads would look like or how they would function without the government’s monotonous slabs of pavement. And even if I could, that would be a case for state planning, for if I could envision the future, why not a council of bureaucrats with allocated funds extracted from the populace?

Again, Hayek perfectly describes the dilemma at hand,
If man is not to do more harm than good in his efforts to improve the social order, he will have to learn that in this, as in all other fields where essential complexity of an organized kind prevails, he cannot acquire the full knowledge which would make mastery of the events possible. He will therefore have to use what knowledge he can achieve, not to shape the results as the craftsman shapes his handiwork, but rather to cultivate a growth by providing the appropriate environment, in the manner in which the gardener does this for his plants. … The recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him against becoming an accomplice in men’s fatal striving to control society -- a striving which makes him not only a tyrant over his fellows, but which may well make him the destroyer of a civilization which no brain has designed but which has grown from the free efforts of millions of individuals.
Murray Rothbard envisioned a system of privately-owned roads, as has Walter Block. Tom DiLorenz has written about the myth that “essential” goods and services must be monopolized. I won’t repeat their conclusions here. Instead, I’ll leave you with another meme. One that I have used to prevent long-winded political debates with statists:


_
Caleb McMillan is an autodidact and an aspiring polymath. He’s travelled all over Canada and currently resides in Canmore, Alberta where he works at a Canadian Tire. He blogs at TANSTAAFL CANADA!





Latest Commentary
- High Priestess Ginsburg Rebukes the Heathen
- Yes, Obama is a Tyrant, Just Like His Predecessor
- Commerce is Civilization; Government is Barbarism
- Springsteen? Mellencamp? Creedence? Heretics All!
- What Exactly Is 'Racism'?
- All Hail the Heroic Bootlegger -- Exemplar of the American Spirit
- Inside the Belly of the Beast for Sunday Service
- Big Brother Wants Your Son









Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Mikey

Posted: Nov 06 2012, 10:07 AM

Link
98220 Why would any individual voluntarily give enough of his own money to build a road? How would you pool enough money from individuals to adequately fund a road? Would everyone be responsible for the road that runs past their own house? Making a patchwork quilt of things?

I'm all for the elimination of government, but their needs to be a plan that contains something more than the stately address' of economic pontificators.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 06 2012, 1:13 PM

Link
72223 Who sells the tires for the cars that drive on those roads?
Chris

Posted: Nov 06 2012, 2:42 PM

Link
To Mikey: The people who benefit most from the road are the ones who would build it, see this recent example here: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-09/us/hawaii.volunteers.repair_1_repairs-wait-business-owners?_s=PM:US

As things are now, many people are subsidizing the costs of roads for other people/businesses who would actually pay for them in a free market, heavy trucks for example cause almost all the damage to roads, while light vehicles almost none, yet the tax differential between the two doesn't reflect this nearly enough. See: http://www.thefreemanonline.org/features/the-distorting-effects-of-transportation-subsidies/
Boskley

Posted: Nov 06 2012, 5:28 PM

Link
24213 To Mikey,

While it only takes one answer to this Q to address your concern, the truth is that 100s or even 1000s of potential solutions to the issue would be ID'd, researched, and market tested. Eventually the best solutions would rise to the top and I'd bet my last dollar that they would be dramatically better then our current "patchwork" system that is overpriced, unreliable, and paid for with money that is forcibly extracted from taxpayers. Disney World has kick ass roads, private neighborhoods have kick ass roads, toll roads are a pain but are typically well-maintained.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 07 2012, 4:08 AM

Link
65110 Forced labor will build the roads!
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 07 2012, 4:09 AM

Link
65110 And with Mr. Smile, there will be plenty of forced labor!

Forward! :-D
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 07 2012, 4:09 AM

Link
65110 Ok, it ain't fun really. I know.
Mikey

Posted: Nov 07 2012, 10:07 AM

Link
98220 Thanks Chris. The link to the Hawaii article was interesting and insightful.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 08 2012, 11:49 PM

Link
205209 The system is "patchwork" due to the same kind of neoliberal bullshit that is promoted on this site...same reason that the people in Hawaii have no help building their roads. Public roads are public -- by force -- because they shouldn't belong to the handful of wage-slavemasters who would monopolize the means of production required to build them. The "free market" is all about "one dollar, one vote," and that kind of free-for-all mentality is simply not good enough for an advanced industrial nation.
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 08 2012, 11:50 PM

Link
205209 It's not a question of who will build the roads, but who will direct their construction, i. e. in whose interests, and who owns them -- the industrialists or the public?
Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Police Officers Caught On Camera Planning To Kill Noisy Animal Prior To Fatally Shooting It - 07/22Undercover Cop Befriends Autistic Boy, Tricks Him Into Selling Him Weed & Busts Him [Full Length VICE Doc] - 07/22RIP, Anne Conte, Age Nine -- A Casualty of Marijuana Prohibition - 07/2276 Year Old Veteran Arrested for Asking Public Official to Speak Louder - 07/22People Wearing Sagging Pants Face $500 Fine, Jail In Florida City - 07/22"It Stops Today!" - 07/22Video Shows Cops In Botched Sting Execute 4 Men, Including Their Own Informant - 07/21FBI Entrapment Created 'Illusion' of Terrorist Plots: Report - 07/22

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top