informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Dec 01 2010, 9:01 PM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: TechLiberation Print

FTC Endorses "Do Not Track" Information Control Regime for the Internet

by Adam Thierer, Technology Liberation Front

This morning, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its eagerly-awaited Preliminary FTC Staff Report on Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: A Proposed Framework for Businesses and Policymakers. As expected, the agency has generally endorsed an expanded regulatory regime to govern online data collection and advertising efforts in the name of protecting consumer privacy.  More specifically, the agency endorsed a so-called “Do Not Track” mechanism that would supposedly help consumers block unwanted data collection or advertising.  Here’s how the agency describes it:
Such a universal mechanism could be accomplished by legislation or potentially through robust, enforceable self-regulation.  The most practical method of providing uniform choice for online behavioral advertising would likely involve placing a setting similar to a persistent cookie on a consumer's browser and conveying that setting to sites that the browser visits, to signal whether or not the consumer wants to be tracked or receive targeted advertisements.  To be effective, there must be an enforceable requirement that sites honor those choices. (p. 66)
I’m sure we’ll have plenty more to say here about the issue in coming weeks and months (comments on the FTC report are due by Jan. 31), but we’ve already commented on this proposal here before. See 1, 2, 3.  To briefly summarize a few of those concerns:
  • Ironically, depending on how it’s implemented, a "Do Not Track" mechanism could potentially require individuals to surrender more personal information about themselves to companies or the government for purposes of authentication and enforcement of the rule.
  • It would also require a re-architecting of the Internet and the potential regulation of every web browser to ensure compliance.  This will give the FTC and other lawmakers far greater control over the Internet’s architecture.
  • For that reason, one can easily imagine would-be Net censors using the “Do Not Track” mechanism being used as a blueprint to regulate other types of online speech.
  • One also wonders if mandatory browser controls opens up a potential new back-door for government surveillance snoops to exploit.
  • Most importantly, if “Do Not Track” really did work as billed, it could fundamentally upend the unwritten quid pro quo that governs online content and services:  Consumers get lots of “free” sites, services, and content, but only if we generally agree to trade some data about ourselves and have ads served up.  After all, as we’ve noted many times before here, there is no free lunch. The cornucopia of seemingly free services and content at our fingertips didn’t just fall to Earth like manna from heaven.  Data collection and advertising made that all happen.  If we undercut this goose that lays the Internet’s golden eggs, consumers could see charges on many services that they currently pay little to nothing for.  Do you want to pay $20 a month for your favorite social networking site?  A dime per search on your preferred search engine?  Well, that’s the future that could await us if we continue down this regulatory road.
Again, more analysis to come.





Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- In Deal To Get Loretta Lynch Confirmed As Attorney General, Senate Agrees To Undermine Free Speech On The Internet
- Miami Police Set to Launch Federally-Funded Pre-Crime System
- CIA-Backed Company May Be Reading Your Facebook Chats
- Report: 'Nearly Every' FBI Forensics Expert Gave Flawed Testimony In 'Almost All Trials' Over A 20-Year Period
- TSA's Investigation Into Groping Agents Ensured They Wouldn't Be Prosecuted
- One Year Ago, FBI Insisted That 'Terrorist' Guy It Arrested Last Week Was No Threat At All
- UK Government Can Now Hand Out Two-Year Sentences For Revenge Porn, Online Trolling
- Middle Schooler Charged With Felony For Hacking Into School's Network To Change Teacher's Desktop Background









Comments Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 02 2010, 12:17 PM

Link
216228 Anything they do in the name of "security" or "protection" provides neither to the average citizen. This is Orwellian speak for stealing our freedoms in order to provide THEMSELVES with "security" and "protection" by enslaving the rest of us and stealing our liberties.
This is what happens to a nation that turns it's back on it's Creator and expects a group of bloodsucking politicians to "save" them.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

"F*ck This Court": Woman Who Took AK-47 To Jailbreak Pens Epic Rant Against Judge - 04/26Dashcam Video Shows Cop Shoot Man 'Armed' With Cell Phone - 04/24Police Cadet Turns in Cop for Turning Body Cam Off Just Before Pummeling his Victim - 04/26Innocent Man Convicted After FBI 'Expert' Analysts Confused his Hair with the Hair of a DOG - 04/26Student Accused of Rape By 'Mattress Girl' Sues Columbia U., Publishes Dozens of Damning Texts - 04/26Four Swedish Cops on Vacation in New York Just Showed Americans What REAL Policing Looks Like - 04/24Average Americans Finding Out They Live In A Police State - 04/26Cop Ruptures Man's Spleen, Fellow Cops Laugh, Take Pics, As He Lays Dying, Begging For Help - 04/24

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top