FTC Endorses "Do Not Track" Information Control Regime for the Internetby Adam Thierer, Technology Liberation Front
Dec. 01, 2010
1.Trump is Right: GOP Debate Audience is Packed Full Of Republican Donors
2.Miami Police Retaliate Against Female Driver Who Filmed Herself Pulling Over Cop
3.Paul Joseph Watson And Stefan Molyneux On The Real Agenda Behind The Migrant Crisis
4.Making InformationLiberation Great Again!
5.Hillary Clinton Suggests She Can't Be Part Of The Establishment Because She Is A Woman
6.Texas Appeals Court Slams Forced DUI Blood Draw
7.'Multicultural Toilets' For 'Global Defecation' Seek to Stop Migrants Pooping On The Floor
8.Code 291: Swedish Police Cover-Up Thousands of Crimes Involving "Refugees"
9.Crewe Residents Accuse Police and School of Covering Up Abuse, Rape Threats by Migrant Kids
10.22 Signs That The Global Economic Turmoil We Have Seen So Far in 2016 Is Just The Beginning
This morning, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its eagerly-awaited Preliminary FTC Staff Report on Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: A Proposed Framework for Businesses and Policymakers. As expected, the agency has generally endorsed an expanded regulatory regime to govern online data collection and advertising efforts in the name of protecting consumer privacy. More specifically, the agency endorsed a so-called “Do Not Track” mechanism that would supposedly help consumers block unwanted data collection or advertising. Here’s how the agency describes it:
Such a universal mechanism could be accomplished by legislation or potentially through robust, enforceable self-regulation. The most practical method of providing uniform choice for online behavioral advertising would likely involve placing a setting similar to a persistent cookie on a consumer's browser and conveying that setting to sites that the browser visits, to signal whether or not the consumer wants to be tracked or receive targeted advertisements. To be effective, there must be an enforceable requirement that sites honor those choices. (p. 66)I’m sure we’ll have plenty more to say here about the issue in coming weeks and months (comments on the FTC report are due by Jan. 31), but we’ve already commented on this proposal here before. See 1, 2, 3. To briefly summarize a few of those concerns: