informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 14 2010, 9:16 AM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: WorldNetDaily Print

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

By Aaron Klein

You can view an earlier version of the paper here.In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"

"We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."

In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to "conspiracy theories" is "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups."

Continued Sunstein: "We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity."

Sunstein said government agents "might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."

Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as "an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role."

Some "conspiracy theories" recommended for ban by Sunstein include:
  • "The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud."

  • "The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."

  • "The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile."

  • "The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy."

  • "That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents."

  • "The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred."
Sunstein allowed that "some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true."

He continued: "The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s,the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of 'mind control.'”

Sunstein's paper advocating against the belief that global warming is a deliberate fraud was written before November's climate scandal in which e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K. indicate top climate researchers conspired to rig data and keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.

Sunstein: Ban 'right wing' rumors

Sunstein's paper is not the first time he has advocated banning the free flow of information.

WND reported that in a recently released book, "On Rumors," Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove "false rumors" while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such "rumors."

In the 2009 book, Sunstein cited as a primary example of "absurd" and "hateful" remarks, reports by "right-wing websites" alleging an association between President Obama and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers.

He also singled out radio talker Sean Hannity for "attacking" Obama regarding the president's "alleged associations."

Ayers became a name in the 2008 presidential campaign when it was disclosed he worked closely with Obama for years. Obama also was said to have launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Ayers' apartment.

'New Deal Fairness Doctrine'

WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a "First Amendment New Deal" – a new "Fairness Doctrine" that would include the establishment of a panel of "nonpartisan experts" to ensure "diversity of view" on the airwaves.

Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.

Sunstein's radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book "The Partial Constitution," received no news media attention and scant scrutiny until the WND report.

In the book, Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the "Fairness Doctrine," the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed "equitable and balanced."

Sunstein introduces what he terms his "First Amendment New Deal" to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.

His proposal, which focuses largely on television, includes a government requirement that "purely commercial stations provide financial subsidies to public television or to commercial stations that agree to provide less profitable but high-quality programming."

Sunstein wrote it is "worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well."

He proposes "compulsory public-affairs programming, right of reply, content review by nonpartisan experts or guidelines to encourage attention to public issues and diversity of view."

The Obama czar argues his regulation proposals for broadcasting are actually presented within the spirit of the Constitution.

"It seems quite possible that a law that contained regulatory remedies would promote rather than undermine the 'freedom of speech,'" he writes.

Writes Sunstein: "The idea that government should be neutral among all forms of speech seems right in the abstract, but as frequently applied it is no more plausible than the idea that it should be neutral between the associational interests of blacks and those of whites under conditions of segregation."

Sunstein contends the landmark case that brought about the Fairness Doctrine, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, "stresses not the autonomy of broadcasters (made possible only by current ownership rights), but instead the need to promote democratic self-government by ensuring that people are presented with a broad range of views about public issues."

He continues: "In a market system, this goal may be compromised. It is hardly clear that 'the freedom of speech' is promoted by a regime in which people are permitted to speak only if other people are willing to pay enough to allow them to be heard."

In his book, Sunstein slams the U.S. courts' unwillingness to "require something like a Fairness Doctrine" to be a result of "the judiciary's lack of democratic pedigree, lack of fact-finding powers and limited remedial authority."

He clarifies he is not arguing the government should be free to regulate broadcasting however it chooses.

"Regulation designed to eliminate a particular viewpoint would of course be out of bounds. All viewpoint discrimination would be banned," Sunstein writes.

But, he says, "at the very least, regulative 'fairness doctrines' would raise no real doubts" constitutionally.

More: Obama Confidant's Spine-Chilling Proposal





Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Bill Aimed At Shutting Off NSA's Water Starts Moving Forward Again
- Baltimore Prosecutors Withdraw Evidence Rather Than Talk About Police Department's Stingray Usage
- Detekt: A New Malware Detection Tool That Can Expose Illegitimate State Surveillance
- 2nd Grader's Homework Teaches 'The Government GIVES Us Our Rights'
- Feds Put Fake Cell Towers On Planes, Spied On Tons Of Innocent Americans
- Terrorists Used False DMCA Claims To Get Personal Data of Anti-Islamic Youtuber
- Court Says By Agreeing To AOL's Terms Of Service, You've 'Consented' To Search By Law Enforcement
- To Nobody's Surprise, Australian "Terrorism" Law May Be Used for Copyright Enforcement









Comments 1 - 20 of 21 Add Comment Page of 2 >
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 9:58 AM

Link
7695 This man obviously is conspiring against "groups who introduce beneficial cognitive diversity".
1stcleanharry

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 11:33 AM

Link
Another zionist stormtrooper "still" trying to shut the "stable door".

TRAITOR!!!!

HH
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 2:20 PM

Link
7122 Hysterically funny.
Sunstien thinks that because they make a law the rest of us are going to pay attention to it?

This is bluster. They want people to be afraid of a government which has close to ZERO power over the masses.
They are trying to scare you.

The US government breaks its own laws all the time...so why should i take them seriously?

They can't even catch a bunch of goat herders armed with boxcutters hiding in caves..

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
screw 'em
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 3:34 PM

Link
98144 lol, this one made me laugh pretty good.
"stop exposing us or we'll tax your asses even more"
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 4:28 PM

Link
198216 Even if they did ban conspiracy theorizing, it wouldn't be effective. It just wouldn't.
TiredofBS

Posted: Jan 14 2010, 7:34 PM

Link
2076 We need to infiltrate government. They are the biggest propagators of conspiracy theories. Theories like imposing taxes will stop "global warming". Equestrian excrement! That guy needs to get laid.
P.S. Let's tax the Banks! How much have they made off of all the wars in the last 300 years?
Dave

Posted: Jan 15 2010, 8:57 AM

Link
the main focal points of exposure that i have investigated are controlled. they use truth but best to find your own.
friendstacy

Posted: Jan 15 2010, 9:08 AM

Link
deconstruction in progress:

"We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity."

they've been doing that for decades. it's nothing new, or surprising, to anyone, is it?

what they don't mention, is that if the group has a heirarchical structure of control, leaders and followers, it is part of the problem, and not a threat to the state. on the contrary, it is the very existence of such groups (pick your side, you are either with us or against us, etc.) that support the state's tyranny over us all.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 15 2010, 2:14 PM

Link
2076 The great thing about all of this is that to find truth you don't need to carry a card or go to meetings. The other great thing is that the people who are employed to troll and debunk ideas will end up finding out what the truth really is.

Ross Wolf

Posted: Jan 15 2010, 5:33 PM

Link
7532 Re: Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

In effect the Obama Government intends to infiltrate and spy on Americans, their groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that question government.

The fact is—government has already laid the groundwork for the covert infiltration of Americans. Since 9/11 federal government has established across the nation more than 112 Fusion Centers. Fusion Centers were originally established to improve the sharing of anti-terrorism intelligence among different state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. But has since expanded with encouragement of the federal government to pursue all crimes and hazards. Fusion Centers now pursue for analysis not just criminal and terrorist information, but any information that can be derived from police, public records and private sector data about Citizens. Fusion Centers increasingly are involving the Military in addition to other government entities. Fusion centers heavily rely on local informants for information about Americans to share with local, State, and federal police agencies. Recently the Department of Homeland Security began sharing more classified Military information with local Fusion Centers: historically local police have not kept secrets well. Because approximately 40 Fusion Centers appear to operate more independently, it is not possible to generalize the mission of Fusion Centers. Fusion Centers take advantage of ambiguous lines of authority to manipulate differences in federal, state and local laws to maximize information collection. Increasingly private security companies and their operatives, work so closely with law enforcement and Fusion Centers—providing and exchanging information about Americans, they appear to merge with police. Fusion Centers exchange information with select private sector companies and continue to evade accountability and public oversight.

While the press has on occasion discussed Fusion Centers invading the privacy of Citizens, media missed Fusion Centers’ involvement in criminal and civil asset forfeitures. Just prior to the establishment of Fusion Centers, Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it was problematic law enforcement and private government contractors would access Fusion Center data to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws to keep part of the assets. There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.” Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged or convicted of a crime for government to forfeit their property.

Under the USA Patriot Act, witnesses can be kept hidden while being paid part of the assets they cause to be forfeited. The Patriot Act specifically mentions using Title 18USC asset forfeiture laws: those laws include a provision in Rep. Henry Hyde’s 2000 bill HR 1658—for “retroactive civil asset forfeiture” of “assets already subject to government forfeiture”, meaning "property already tainted by crime" provided “the property” was already part of or “later connected” to a criminal investigation in progress" when HR.1658 passed. That can apply to more than two hundred federal laws and violations.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 20 2010, 12:33 PM

Link
99229 Is anyone really shocked at this. Anyone who has been on infowars has seen the countless trolls who don't really fool anyone with their attempts at infiltration. Lucky for us this site remains under the radar of the under-cover thought-police agents.

On a side note, I had a nasty scare last night when I started looking into "hate speech" laws and realized that they will probably be utilized to solve this whole problem for the governments of the world.

Luckily in Canada where I live, hate speech in a criminal sense is "inciting genocide against an identifable group." However human rights committees can still be used to bring civil actions against offensive internet speech directed towards a racial/religious/political group.

Ross Wolf

Posted: Jan 21 2010, 9:59 AM

Link
71142 Re: Top Obama Czar Cass Sunstein
Infiltrate all 'Conspiracy Theorists'

Will Democrats Revisit The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act?"

From a recent news report, it appears Obama CZAR Cass Sunstein, supports infiltrating and spying on Americans, their groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government.
See: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884

Obama’s CZAR’s proposal appears to duplicate Rep. Jane Harman's "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" HR 1955, introduced in 2007 that stressed disrupting political and other groups without evidence of wrongdoing. Interestingly Obama refused to take a position on this bill.

Rep. Harman's "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" was not written exactly like the Nazi 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Reich Constitution, but could bring America to the same place by trashing America’s civil liberties. The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" when closely examined, defined "homegrown terrorism" as "any planned act" that might use force to coerce the U.S. Government or its people to promote or accomplish a "political or social objective." No actual force need occur. Government need only charge that an individual or group “Thought” about doing it. This bill was passed by the House but later died in a Senate Committee after Americans became angry upon learning about it.

Currently—the U.S. Government has already laid the groundwork for the covert infiltration of Americans. Since 9/11 federal government has established across the nation more than 112 Fusion Centers. Fusion Centers were originally established to improve the sharing of anti-terrorism intelligence among different state, local and federal law enforcement agencies. But has since expanded with encouragement of the federal government to pursue all crimes and hazards. Fusion Centers now pursue for analysis not just criminal and terrorist information, but any information that can be derived from police, public records and private sector data about Americans. Fusion Centers increasingly are involving components of the U.S. Military in addition to other government entities to spy on Citizens. Fusion centers heavily rely on local informants for information that is shared with Local, State, and Federal police agencies. Recently the Department of Homeland Security began sharing more classified Military information with local Fusion Centers; perhaps a mistake; historically local police have not kept secrets.

Because approximately 40 Fusion Centers appear to operate more independently than others, it is not possible to generalize the mission of Fusion Centers. Some Fusion Centers however, take advantage of ambiguous lines of authority to manipulate differences in federal, state and local laws to maximize information collection. Increasingly (private security companies and their operatives) work so closely with law enforcement and Fusion Centers—providing and exchanging information about Americans, they appear to merge with police. That is what happened in Germany during the 1930’s when a private Gestapo merged its operations with German State Police. Fusion Centers exchange information with select U.S. private sector companies; that has enabled fusion centers to escape accountability and public oversight.

While the press on occasion has discussed Fusion Centers invading the privacy of Citizens, media missed Fusion Centers’ involvement in criminal and civil asset forfeitures. It was problematic law enforcement and private government contractors would gain wider access to Fusion Center data to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws to keep part of the assets.
Anonymous

Posted: Feb 02 2010, 3:40 AM

Link
17328 To exact Freedom, Justice and Liberty from the so-called Rich and Powerful, it is he RESPONSIBILITY of the governed to ensure they are in a state of PERPETUAL FEAR...Any other approach to dealing with them will produce state in which WE now live - perpetual fear!

The Wealthy and Powerful must realize their wealth and power have strict limitations - Human limitations. The must be made to see and understand that they too must live precariously as all men do. Neither their wealth nor their bought minions will protect them from th consequences of their Sin, Dishonesty and Immorality. They too must be made to 'look over their shoulder at every sound'...
Anonymous

Posted: Mar 06 2010, 4:42 PM

Link
98218 I think Sunstein is exactly right and I hope the law passes!
Donn Costanzo II

Posted: Mar 15 2010, 2:53 AM

Link
9937 I will do as i please. Fuck Cass Sunstein. I hope the people wake up to this global warming fraud before all the measures are pushed that will kill our economy. Ya know it makes you wonder why the water levels haven't risen, but yet Al Gore's bank account has....hmm
Sunstein is the bogeyman

Posted: Apr 01 2010, 6:11 AM

Link
188222 Infiltrate conspiracy theorists?? Governments control many conspiracy theorists! Many conspiracy theories originate in the shady disinformation departments of governments and are put out there to muddy the waters discredit conspiracy theorists and control potential opposition.

Cass Sunstein is merely driving home propaganda that conspiracy theorists are crazies to discredit them whilst at the same time causing fear amongst conspiracy theorists so that they turn to the controlled opposition leaders who pick up on this story and run with it. People need to think for themselves. Governments are always happiest when the public let small numbers of others think for them (the controlled media, controlled leaders, controlled campaign groups).
T. Morlan

Posted: Apr 03 2010, 7:16 PM

Link
17425 Seriously, is the fck on crackain? Ban conspiracy theroizing? How in the big scheme of things can you do that w/o getting your ass wacked? We Americans are about ready to open the can of proverbial whoop ass on some morons, soon.
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 14 2010, 4:22 PM

Link
71105 wewll after perusing this site I have used one test i allways use in these areas of investigation. I have not seen the word "JEW" anywhere in 6 or 7 articles I have read here.You even have article on man above with out mentioning the guy is a jew,obamas cabinet is jewish as most recent and not so recent presidents cabuinets were, the astate department is almost all jewsih and in reality should be caled israel's department in america, aipac runs the political scene adl runs the political correct scene, southern poverty law center does a monitoring of militias and opposition in the country.If you never admit,are aware of the maligat jewish starngle hold on this country and europe you will never know what the source of all the worlds problems are. If you do not know the the rise of the jews takeover of this country and how and why they do it then you have nothing to add to reverse this.and please do not reply with the standard comments of "you are moronic anti semite""why do you hate the jews you nazi shithead"take your rascism and go to hell" and similar diatribes all programmed into you with buzz words that emote emotional irrational responses.the othe reaction would be to investigate the jewish role in the countries situation. bye kiddies.
Anonymous

Posted: Mar 01 2011, 10:10 AM

Link
7571 I think he should be banned from being a moron. What's the deal with all the Czars anyway? Czar = tyranny = time for some American Revolution type action. Let's get our country back into the hands of the people, not in the hands of the war-mongering, greedy a**holes running things now.
Rwolf

Posted: Jan 15 2012, 1:00 AM

Link
10876 In Jan. 2010 it was reported Top Obama Czar Cass Sunstein supported infiltrating and spying on Americans, their groups and organizations to disrupt and neutralize Americans that spread conspiracy theories, including against U.S. Government. This would be accomplished in part by U.S. Government assets disseminating counter-information.

Interestingly, Cass Sunstein’s infiltration proposal appeared to resemble Rep. Jane Harman's "2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" HR 1955 that stressed, disrupting political and other groups without evidence of wrongdoing. Had Harman’s bill passed, U.S. Government would have the power to spy on and intimidate Americans from exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech and Association. Millions of Americans would fear supporting or attending any political and other “planned meeting” out of concern they might be labeled a terrorist or supporter of Home Grown Terrorism or Violent Radicalization.

Under Rep. Harman’s "2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" Government would only have to allege a group member “Thought about committing violence or damaging property” to label an individual or group “prone” to committing “Violent Radicalization or Terrorism. Activists who set up web sites promoting a “Planned Activity”; wrote, emailed or handed out "flyers" promoting a “Planned” event or demonstration could be alleged to have inspired Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism—even if not violence occurred. Demonstrators alleged by police to have blocked a roadway, intimidated drivers, shoppers, employees; anyone from entering or leaving a place could be accused of coercing government or its people. Under the Harmon legislation "Information flyers" NOT intended by the author to be distributed by a particular group or at a planned event—but somehow got distributed, could potentially open the door for government to charge the author promoted "Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Such concerns might have crushed written dissent.

The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" mentioned, “any planned meeting or bodily act in America” against a U.S. foreign alley; no violence was required. For example: American labor unions, human rights and environmental organizations could potentially have been at risk under The "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" if they (planned or had meetings in America) to lawfully protest a foreign U.S. alley and or networked with or supported foreign activists that intended or protested a U.S. foreign alley. The Harmon bill appeared to criminalize constitutionally protected 1st amendment activities. Had the Harmon bill passed, U.S. Government, federal and state police would have had little difficulty terminating American activists and organizations exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech, Free Association and Expression. Police and Agent Provocateurs could easily destroy e.g. any anti-war group or organization by covertly joining a protest demonstration to instigate violence; or undercover police covertly contacting participants before, at or after a "planned" meeting or demonstration... (then lie) allege a group member committed or intended to commit violence in order that government could assert a group was ideologically based toward violence; supported "Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Although The 2007 "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" Failed To Pass, subsequently in 2012, Congress destroyed and diminished many of Americans’ Constitutional Rights upon Pres. Obama signing The National Defense Authorization ACT of 2012 (NDAA). Under NDAA, U.S. Government does not need probable cause or corroborating evidence to Indefinitely Detain Americans on U.S. Soil without charges if suspected of being involved in terrorism or posing a threat to National Security. Consequently Indefinitely Detained Americans have no right to legal counsel, a trial or Habeas Corpus.

Alarmingly Corrupt Police, Government Agents and Agent Provocateurs may too easily falsify reports and give false testimony see (COINTELPRO) to cause U.S. Government to disappear Americans; cause innocent U.S. Citizens to be swept off the street and indefinitely incarcerated based only on suspicion that someone is a terrorist or involved in terrorism. Note no actual planned, intended or violent act is required for U.S. Government to allege someone is involved in terrorism under (NDAA).
Comments 1 - 20 of 21 Page of 2 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

This is What a High School Football Game Looks Like In a Police State - 11/21No Charges For Cop Filmed Breaking Man's Face For Failure To ID, "Shoulder Thrust" Made Cop Fear For His Safety - 11/21Very Large Cop Waylays High School Girl, Chaos Ensues After Students Become Angry at the Deputy - 11/21Man Imprisoned For Decades On False Child Molestation Charge Freed After Claim Recanted - 11/21Washington Cop Attempts to Incite Photographer by Invading Personal Space - 11/21Casino Can Steal NJ Man's Home Through Eminent Domain For No Specific Reason, Judge Rules - 11/20Texas Cop Indicted For Stealing Cash Out Of People's Wallets After Asking For ID - 11/20Deputy Tries Using Civil Asset Forfeiture On DVD From Convenience Store, Loses Job - 11/20

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top