The End of QE Is Not the End of Bad Policyby John P. CochranMises Institute Nov. 06, 2014 |
Trump Welcomes 'The Highly Respected' Alan Dershowitz Into The GOP, Shills His New Book
Ben Shapiro: Trump Should 'Just Blow Up Kharg Island'
House Passes NDAA With Section 219 Aimed at 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
Sen. Graham Worked With Israeli Officials to Push GOP Senators to Pass Aid Package, Amb. Reveals
Netanyahu Confirms Plan to 'Merge' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
![]() Recently the financial press and media has been abuzz as the Federal Reserve moved closer to the anticipated end to its massive bond and mortgage backed securities purchases known as quantitative easing. James Bullard, President of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, stirred controversy last week when he suggested the Fed should consider continuing the bond buying program after October. But at the October 29th meeting, the policy makers did as anticipated and "agreed to end its asset purchase program." However one voting member agreed with Mr. Bullard. Per the official press release, "Voting against the action was Narayana Kocherlakota, who believed that, in light of continued sluggishness in the inflation outlook and the recent slide in market-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations, the Committee should commit to keeping the current target range for the federal funds rate at least until the one-to-two-year ahead inflation outlook has returned to 2 percent and should continue the asset purchase program at its current level" (emphasis added). The action yesterday completes the phase out, which began in January 2014, of the controversial QE3 under the leadership of Ben Bernanke and continued unabated under Janet Yellen. |