informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Aug 18 2014, 12:51 AM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: William Norman Grigg Print

Michael Brown, the "Tom Joad Test," and Darren Wilson's Likely Defense

by William Norman Grigg

In assessing any act of police violence I believe it’s wise to apply what I’ve called the “Tom Joad Test”: When you see a police officer beating or shooting a citizen, is your first impulse to sympathize with the uniformed assailant, or the victim? If the former is the case, you’re a natural authoritarian; it the latter is true, you’re an instinctive libertarian.

The American concept of law and justice is rooted in the idea that state agents must justify their use of force against individuals who are presumed innocent of wrongdoing until guilt is proven. Learning that the victim in the scenario above actually committed a crime doesn’t invalidate the test: Liberty-minded people will never give the state or its agents the benefit of the doubt in the use of violence, particularly of the lethal variety.

Michael Brown may have committed a violent felony prior to being fatally shot by Officer Darren Wilson — who was not seeking to arrest Brown in connection with that crime at the time of their encounter. Therefore any justification for that shooting would depend on whether Brown posed a potentially lethal threat to Wilson. Because the Ferguson PD didn’t install a dashcam aboard Wilson’s patrol vehicle (officer accountability is not a priority for that department), no objective record of the encounter exists. Police officials insist that Brown assaulted Wilson in his vehicle and tried to take his gun; eyewitness Dorian Johnson insists that Wilson assaulted Brown, threatened him, and shot him while the 18-year-old was trying to surrender.

Wilson’s original account was offered behind the shield of his Garrity privilege, which means it cannot be used in criminal or civil prosecution. His defense will be built on the proposition that he considered Brown — despite being unarmed — to be a threat to himself or others, and acted as any “reasonable officer” would in those circumstances.

Missouri’s state statute dealing with justifiable homicide offers considerable latitude in the use of lethal force by police: It states that an officer may do so against someone who “has committed or attempted to commit a felony … or may otherwise endanger life or inflict serious injury unless arrested without delay.”

As Ferguson PD Chief Thomas Jackson has acknowledged, Wilson didn’t identify Brown as a suspect in a strongarm robbery (this didn’t prevent Jackson from releasing information about that robbery to the press, thereby obliquely connecting that crime to the Brown shooting). So any role Brown played in that robbery wouldn’t be relevant under the first of the justifications listed above. Thus Wilson’s defense will rest heavily on the claim that Brown assaulted him and fled — and that this would justify a lethal response, even if Brown was unarmed.

What about eyewitness claims that Brown was surrendering at the time he was shot?

Wilson and his defenders are likely crafting a defense under 563.031.1(1)(a), which allows for the use of lethal force against someone who "has withdrawn from an encounter ... but later persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened use of unlawful force..."

A woman claiming to be a friend of Officer Wilson's "Significant Other" called a local talk show to relate what she described as a second-hand version of Wilson’s story in which Brown supposedly turned around and “charged” at the officer, despite the fact that bullets were flying. A video recorded immediately after the shooting contains garbled and ambiguous comments from an off-camera witness that could be construed as telling a similar story.

At this point, the likeliest outcome of the official investigation will be that the shooting will be ruled “justified” because the alleged assault on Wilson left the officer in “fear for his life,” and Brown’s pleas to surrender were a ruse in anticipation of “continuing the incident.” This may not comport with eyewitness accounts of the incident, or available ballistic evidence. (It may be significant that Attorney General Eric Holder has ordered a third autopsy to be performed on Brown’s remains.)

Because of the institutional privileges enjoyed by law enforcement (for example, Missouri law explicitly authorizes police to act as aggressors under 563.031[1][b]), Wilson and his colleagues will be able to rule that the killing of Michael Brown was legally “justified” even if it was not morally justifiable.





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: None Are Safe from the State's Plundering Parasites
- Baltimore Cop Given Just 6 Months; Assault Victim Speaks Out
- Pennsylvania Limits Secondary Questioning During Traffic Stop
- John Ashcroft Supports Government Theft
- Innocent Bystander Attacked by Police K9 In Fresno
- Charges Dropped Against Cop Caught Having Sex With Cows
- Indiana Cops Arrest Man for Asking for Their Badge Number
- Who Will They Serve? Warnings Mount That Body Cameras Could Do More Harm Than Good









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Shawnda

Posted: Aug 18 2014, 2:13 AM

Link
74197 It is ridiculous to assume that if one has sympathy for the person being beaten, that Libertarianism is the only choice. After that insane premise, I stopped reading.
irishpete

Posted: Aug 18 2014, 1:20 PM

Link
82145 Gotta agree with you Shawnda, I don't particularly like " opinion pieces " such as Mr. Griggs on the site , I come here to gain factual information, not political commentary, regardless of the source. Give me the facts & I'll come to my own conclusions thank you very much.......
Anonymous

Posted: Nov 21 2014, 12:38 PM

Link
66102 I think you both miss the point. He's not saying you're a libertarian, just that you're more libertarian than authoritarian - meaning you sympathize more with people against whom legal authority is wielded, rather than people who wield that authority (police).


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: None Are Safe from the State's Plundering Parasites - 05/22Baltimore Cop Given Just 6 Months; Assault Victim Speaks Out - 05/22Charges Dropped Against Cop Caught Having Sex With Cows - 05/21Innocent Bystander Attacked by Police K9 In Fresno - 05/21Indiana Cops Arrest Man for Asking for Their Badge Number - 05/21Pennsylvania Limits Secondary Questioning During Traffic Stop - 05/22New Police Radars Are Being Used To 'See' Inside Homes - 05/08John Ashcroft Supports Government Theft - 05/22

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top