Patently ridiculous: 5 video game patents you didn't know existedby Mark Brown
Jul. 29, 2011
1.Trump is Right: GOP Debate Audience is Packed Full Of Republican Donors
2.Miami Police Retaliate Against Female Driver Who Filmed Herself Pulling Over Cop
3.Paul Joseph Watson And Stefan Molyneux On The Real Agenda Behind The Migrant Crisis
4.Making InformationLiberation Great Again!
5.Hillary Clinton Suggests She Can't Be Part Of The Establishment Because She Is A Woman
6.Texas Appeals Court Slams Forced DUI Blood Draw
7.'Multicultural Toilets' For 'Global Defecation' Seek to Stop Migrants Pooping On The Floor
8.Code 291: Swedish Police Cover-Up Thousands of Crimes Involving "Refugees"
9.Crewe Residents Accuse Police and School of Covering Up Abuse, Rape Threats by Migrant Kids
10.22 Signs That The Global Economic Turmoil We Have Seen So Far in 2016 Is Just The Beginning
Patents are tricky things. On one hand they're a smart move, letting bold new innovators take cash and credit for their groundbreaking ideas. They stamp out direct clones and stop your competitors from swiping your smartest inventions.
But they can also stifle and strangle creativity, putting a legal chokehold on the coolest concepts, mechanics, and ideas. In this article, you'll see both hardware design and gameplay ideas - including modes, features, and scoring systems -†locked down by patents.
Imagine how differently the games industry would be if id Software had patented the first-person shooter, or if Mario-maker Shigeru Miyamoto had patented jumping (something he considered during the NES days).
As Lodsys continues its legal barrage against iPhone developers that use in-app purchases (including simulation game Pocket God), we've collected five different gaming patents that you probably didn't know existed, and explain how they've changed the way games, controllers, and handhelds are designed.