|
"At no point in the president's 10-year projection would the U.S. government spend less than it's taking in."Peter Suderman | February 14, 2011Reason Feb. 14, 2011 |
Popular 
ADL, Jewish Groups Lobby California to Classify Jews as a Race, 'Not Just a Faith'
Netanyahu Confirms Plan to 'Merge' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
Leaked Texts Show Charlie Kirk Threatened to 'Leave the Pro-Israel Cause' Two Days Before His Murder
Trump Welcomes 'The Highly Respected' Alan Dershowitz Into The GOP, Shills His New Book
House Passes NDAA With Section 219 Aimed at 'Merging' U.S. and Israeli Militaries
 Echoing the administration's line that "the easy cuts are behind us," Politico's David Rogers says Obama's 2012 budget is "long on tough choices." That depends on how you define "tough." Jake Tapper of ABC News gives those alleged hard choices some context: "At no point in the president's 10-year projection would the U.S. government spend less than it's taking in." By the president's own definition, then, today's budget plan isn't sustainable. Full Story 
|
