informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Analysis posted Oct 14 2010, 5:33 PM Category: Commentary Source: InformationLiberation Print

The Government Would Rather You Die If It Nets More Revenue

Chris | InformationLiberation

An absolutely astonishing story was quietly reported recently without much fanfare. The story was unquestionably viral, it made the rounds on the internet, but it never got the major boost of coverage from the major media to propel it into the national debate.

Why was this the case?

One can only guess, but perhaps it was because the story was one of the greatest examples of the nature of government and the people who populate it.

That story was of a rather innocuous headline, 'yellow lights are being shortened' all over the United States.

Seems insignificant?

Hardly.

When yellow lights are shortened from 5 seconds to 3, a dramatic increase in accidents occurs. Yet, something else occurs besides more people dying...

Red light camera revenue is increased.

The government is here to help is it not? Their whole purpose is to keep us safe? We're endlessly harangued about how we need to give up our liberties for safety... Surely they will choose keeping people safe instead of netting more revenue at the cost of actively causing more people to die?

Unfortunately, while you or I would choose without question to keep people safe, that's not the nature of the people who populate the reigns of government. They chose more deaths and more revenue.

The government would rather you die if it means they get more revenue. That is a "trade off" they're more than willing to make.

Think about that next time someone tells you the government is "here to help."
___
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com. He doesn't want to be ruled by people who care more about revenue than helping the people they claim to protect. You can read more of his commentary here.





Latest Commentary
- If You Vote or Don't Vote Complain
- How Far Can the P2P Revolution Go?
- The Index Card of Allowable Opinion
- Should Government Have the Power to Quarantine?
- Obama Appointee Supports Individual Rights
- Let the Market Contain Ebola
- The State as a Royal Scam
- Glenn Greenwald TED Talk: Why Privacy Matters









Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 14 2010, 10:18 PM

Link
99142 Kind of like Health Insurance corporations would rather you die if it means more revenue.
Chris

Posted: Oct 14 2010, 10:47 PM

Link
1. Health insurance is optional*. No one is forcing you to buy it*.

2. Health insurance is one of the most highly "regulated" industries in the entire economy, competition is literally banned. Thank the government for that.

*The government mandate from the health care bill will force you to buy it at the barrel of a gun, obviously that removes any incentive the companies had to provide a good service because the purchasing of their "service" is literally mandated by law. Again, thank the government for that.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 15 2010, 12:23 AM

Link
71114 "We're endlessly harangued about how we need to give up our liberties for safety..."

And what deluded fool thought that was just because "they love us" or "like us". You don't want your milk cows falling off cliffs and getting eaten by wolves. The only reason they give a flying fuck about us is because of the revenue stream(s) we produce via taxes, fines and associated methods of state sanctioned theft.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 17 2010, 6:42 PM

Link
174106 Did you ever wonder if the government has life insurance policies out on all of us? Just saying....
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 04 2011, 6:24 PM

Link
98176 I was .06 second into a 3 second red light. 500 bucks!!!!!

No sympathy from the judge! It was like, you poor thing. YOU. WERE. UN. LUCKY .... down the hall please, pay the fine .

Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

FBI Agents Cut Internet Access, Pose As Repairmen To Perform Warrantless Search - 10/30LAPD Officer Accused Of Punting Man's Face Like He Was 'Kicking A Field Goal' - 10/30Patriot Act, Passed to Fight Terrorism, Used Mostly In Drug Investigations - 10/30Mom Faces Jail For Using Cannabis Oil To Treat 15-Yr-Old Son's Chronic Pain - 10/30Antonio Buehler Found Not Guilty After Almost 3 Years - 10/30Sarcastic "God Bless You" Triggers Miami Cop To Go On Psychotic Tirade - 10/29"Crush the Seed of Ishmael": A "Final Solution" to the "Muslim Problem" - 10/09Cop Attempts to Tackle Topless Protester, Rams Head First Into Wall Instead - 10/29

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top