informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 28 2008, 10:26 AM Category: Commentary Source: Center for Public Integrity Print

False Pretenses

By Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith

Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.

On at least 532 separate occasions (in speeches, briefings, interviews, testimony, and the like), Bush and these three key officials, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to Al Qaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration's case for war.

It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda. This was the conclusion of numerous bipartisan government investigations, including those by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2004 and 2006), the 9/11 Commission, and the multinational Iraq Survey Group, whose "Duelfer Report" established that Saddam Hussein had terminated Iraq's nuclear program in 1991 and made little effort to restart it.

In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003. Not surprisingly, the officials with the most opportunities to make speeches, grant media interviews, and otherwise frame the public debate also made the most false statements, according to this first-ever analysis of the entire body of prewar rhetoric.

President Bush, for example, made 232 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and another 28 false statements about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Secretary of State Powell had the second-highest total in the two-year period, with 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Rumsfeld and Fleischer each made 109 false statements, followed by Wolfowitz (with 85), Rice (with 56), Cheney (with 48), and McClellan (with 14).

The massive database at the heart of this project juxtaposes what President Bush and these seven top officials were saying for public consumption against what was known, or should have been known, on a day-to-day basis. This fully searchable database includes the public statements, drawn from both primary sources (such as official transcripts) and secondary sources (chiefly major news organizations) over the two years beginning on September 11, 2001. It also interlaces relevant information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches, and interviews.

Consider, for example, these false public statements made in the run-up to war:
  • On August 26, 2002, in an address to the national convention of the Veteran of Foreign Wars, Cheney flatly declared: "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us." In fact, former CIA Director George Tenet later recalled, Cheney's assertions went well beyond his agency's assessments at the time. Another CIA official, referring to the same speech, told journalist Ron Suskind, "Our reaction was, 'Where is he getting this stuff from?' "
  • In the closing days of September 2002, with a congressional vote fast approaching on authorizing the use of military force in Iraq, Bush told the nation in his weekly radio address: "The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order is given. . . . This regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material could build one within a year." A few days later, similar findings were also included in a much-hurried National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction — an analysis that hadn't been done in years, as the intelligence community had deemed it unnecessary and the White House hadn't requested it.
  • In July 2002, Rumsfeld had a one-word answer for reporters who asked whether Iraq had relationships with Al Qaeda terrorists: "Sure." In fact, an assessment issued that same month by the Defense Intelligence Agency (and confirmed weeks later by CIA Director Tenet) found an absence of "compelling evidence demonstrating direct cooperation between the government of Iraq and Al Qaeda." What's more, an earlier DIA assessment said that "the nature of the regime's relationship with Al Qaeda is unclear."
  • On May 29, 2003, in an interview with Polish TV, President Bush declared: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories." But as journalist Bob Woodward reported in State of Denial, days earlier a team of civilian experts dispatched to examine the two mobile labs found in Iraq had concluded in a field report that the labs were not for biological weapons. The team's final report, completed the following month, concluded that the labs had probably been used to manufacture hydrogen for weather balloons.
  • On January 28, 2003, in his annual State of the Union address, Bush asserted: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." Two weeks earlier, an analyst with the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research sent an email to colleagues in the intelligence community laying out why he believed the uranium-purchase agreement "probably is a hoax."
  • On February 5, 2003, in an address to the United Nations Security Council, Powell said: "What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources." As it turned out, however, two of the main human sources to which Powell referred had provided false information. One was an Iraqi con artist, code-named "Curveball," whom American intelligence officials were dubious about and in fact had never even spoken to. The other was an Al Qaeda detainee, Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi, who had reportedly been sent to Eqypt by the CIA and tortured and who later recanted the information he had provided. Libi told the CIA in January 2004 that he had "decided he would fabricate any information interrogators wanted in order to gain better treatment and avoid being handed over to [a foreign government]."
The false statements dramatically increased in August 2002, with congressional consideration of a war resolution, then escalated through the mid-term elections and spiked even higher from January 2003 to the eve of the invasion.



It was during those critical weeks in early 2003 that the president delivered his State of the Union address and Powell delivered his memorable U.N. presentation. For all 935 false statements, including when and where they occurred, go to the search page for this project; the methodology used for this analysis is explained here.

In addition to their patently false pronouncements, Bush and these seven top officials also made hundreds of other statements in the two years after 9/11 in which they implied that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or links to Al Qaeda. Other administration higher-ups, joined by Pentagon officials and Republican leaders in Congress, also routinely sounded false war alarms in the Washington echo chamber.

The cumulative effect of these false statements — amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts — was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war. Some journalists — indeed, even some entire news organizations — have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, "independent" validation of the Bush administration's false statements about Iraq.

The "ground truth" of the Iraq war itself eventually forced the president to backpedal, albeit grudgingly. In a 2004 appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, for example, Bush acknowledged that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq. And on December 18, 2005, with his approval ratings on the decline, Bush told the nation in a Sunday-night address from the Oval Office: "It is true that Saddam Hussein had a history of pursuing and using weapons of mass destruction. It is true that he systematically concealed those programs, and blocked the work of U.N. weapons inspectors. It is true that many nations believed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. But much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong. As your president, I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq. Yet it was right to remove Saddam Hussein from power."

Bush stopped short, however, of admitting error or poor judgment; instead, his administration repeatedly attributed the stark disparity between its prewar public statements and the actual "ground truth" regarding the threat posed by Iraq to poor intelligence from a Who's Who of domestic agencies.

On the other hand, a growing number of critics, including a parade of former government officials, have publicly — and in some cases vociferously — accused the president and his inner circle of ignoring or distorting the available intelligence. In the end, these critics say, it was the calculated drumbeat of false information and public pronouncements that ultimately misled the American people and this nation's allies on their way to war.

Bush and the top officials of his administration have so far largely avoided the harsh, sustained glare of formal scrutiny about their personal responsibility for the litany of repeated, false statements in the run-up to the war in Iraq. There has been no congressional investigation, for example, into what exactly was going on inside the Bush White House in that period. Congressional oversight has focused almost entirely on the quality of the U.S. government's pre-war intelligence — not the judgment, public statements, or public accountability of its highest officials. And, of course, only four of the officials — Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz — have testified before Congress about Iraq.

Short of such review, this project provides a heretofore unavailable framework for examining how the U.S. war in Iraq came to pass. Clearly, it calls into question the repeated assertions of Bush administration officials that they were the unwitting victims of bad intelligence.

Above all, the 935 false statements painstakingly presented here finally help to answer two all-too-familiar questions as they apply to Bush and his top advisers: What did they know, and when did they know it?





Latest Commentary
- With Government Roads, the Customer Is Always Wrong
- Ranchers vs. Regulators: The Clark County Range War
- Bundy, the Senecas and Fighting for Sovereignty
- Tax Day: What Kind of "Civilization" Are We Paying For?
- Justice Should be Blind, Not Crazy
- US Supreme Court Endorses Involuntary Servitude
- The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return
- Gun-Control Madness









Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dave

Posted: Jan 28 2008, 6:23 PM

Link
I think it should be stated that both Bush and Hussein are members of the same organisation, to put some history in place it was the British who stole Kuwait from Iraq and installed a repressive puppet dictatorship.

I reported elsewhere on this site about covert british testing from Iraqi samples, although they had upped and left by the time I visited the facility, enough was there to know they had been there.

As for RIIA subcontractors at the CFR like Bush and Cheney, of course they lie, that isn't news, they were put there to follow orders and lie. I doubt that is news.
dave

Posted: Jan 29 2008, 3:53 PM

Link
Senator Jesse Helms 15th December 1987:

"This campaign against the American people - against traditional American culture and values - is SYSTEMATIC PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE. It is orchestrated by a vast arrary of interests comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left. Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.

Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working to create what some refer to as THE NEW WORLD ORDER. Private organisations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called NEW WORLD ORDER in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles."

(emphasis mine)
queenofit

Posted: Jan 29 2008, 5:37 PM

Link
Just like Dave says the lies? Nothing really shocking about that one, but for me to read Dave's quote from Jesse Helms dated back in Sept. 15, 1987, now that got me googling. Dave I see where Jesse Helms was himself a 33 degree freemason.

This plot to take over the world is so hard for simple mind like me to wrap my thoughts around. I realize that this is factual, I realize that we are being lied to, and I don't watch tv, I don't do lot of things that would cause me to allow my mind to be controlled, and yet still I feel so helpless.

I saw another remark from another speech just a few minutes ago. It was from another site where Jesse Helms was quoted, also similar quote from David Rockefeller, that you have pointed out here to us. But this[following quote] really got me thinking.....I wonder if you(Dave) could comment on this quote

"However, if we understand this correspondence, we can easily understand the words of Marcel Déat, as published, in 1943, under German supervision, in his daily newspaper, L’Œuvre [i.e. “The Task”] Déat said:

“It is a question of creating one great European Economic State…The new Europe will either be socialist or it will not exist at all.”!

Here is the beginning of understanding the hidden history of modern Europe - not a Europe which could combine free countries while preserving their sovereignty (i.e. without imposing a supranational state) but that of Jean Monnet, whom the CIA financed in order to create a system of European governance, just like that which Walter Funk, the Nazi Minister of Finance, actually designed."

source:
Speech by William Wolf, publisher of Facts and Chronicles denied to the Public, by Pierre de Villemarest www.aquilion.com
YankInOz

Posted: Jan 29 2008, 11:09 PM

Link
dave & queenofit - you are both on the right track. I agree and from the research and study that I have done since the 1960's, there is no place to find refuge UNLESS the people of the world find a way out of this. This is not a "national" - my country is better than your country - problem. It truly is global. Those who are stealing power by deception and destruction have but one goal - to enslave those they feel are worthy to exist (fulfilling the oligarchists needs only) and providing the means for all the rest of mankind to destroy themselves by divisiveness and radicalisation. We all know that power corrupts and the subset of that statement. The quest for the return to power of the elite has been an inner circle passion since the implementation of the Magna Carta in 1215! None of these deceptions are new - it is still the same little old lady with new makeup!

My concern is that people are more interested in the Super Bowl than in the loss of their personal sovereignty by the introduction of regional governmental bodies; which is the final step prior to the single global government. Just as the League of Nations was the precursor of the United Nations, so is the UN the precursor to the One Earth Union. Then totalitarian rule will be the only legitimate government.

How far off? Well, 2010 is the year for the North American Union. I believe that 2020 is the year for the One Earth Union. I am not sure I will still be around for that one but I can only hope that there will be a real Rebel Alliance.

Consider what the real agenda is with all you see going on right now: who do the elitists want to be elected to US President? What benefit does having a woman and a black man in chaos against each other do for the elect-ability of a Republican? If you do not see the orchestration that is taking place, then you need to read more and watch less Faux News.

Remember this: there are no accidents in finance and politics. And usually those "accidents" are well planned and orchestrated by ministers of both ilk.
dave

Posted: Jan 29 2008, 11:21 PM

Link
If you wanted to take over the world, there is both sense and simplicity in what has been done. You might come up with different ways if thinking about it but you have to use their minds not yours and consider all the agendas and power brokers in play. It is useful to look from all angles if you want to conversely look at helping all people. Although you should always assume you have been outsmarted, one does have to take chances in life, quite often it is more dangerous not to. For example, if I was taken out, you could conclude hey he was a risky nutter. Not so, millions and millions and millions have been slaughtered for this agenda, that happens because we have tolerated these things, probably worse, we didn't stop and think to even know. One of the numerous mistakes I made was over Blair, he was such a revolting liar I stopped watching those guys. I may not have joined the dots but I denied myself the opportunity.

I haven't checked back on some data but recalling quickly the trilateral tribe is so named as it relates to 3 logical divisions of the world, one logical chunk being europe. (I always do a double take when I when I mention trilateral as their logo is like that of Nat West Bank in the uk, bought out by a Scottish Bank not so long ago). Although the trilaterals are in government, the trilaterals are effectively as they would see it the US government, the public government just the agency they excercise that power through and similary position at the top of the bilderbergers (with the british muts all over the place though less visible).

The CIA has to be the key player, the economic rise of Russia was crushed, Royalty murdered and British agent Stalin installed, America as a british cologny was the nation built for the task, the infrastructure and slush funds to build and control europe.
dave

Posted: Jan 29 2008, 11:29 PM

Link
Then it comes to an ideology of dictatorship. If I take you down in a chain gang to plant crops, you are in a visible prison. Socialism puts the state in control of every aspect of your life, but you don't have to wear the chains or sleep behind bars. Also a more suitable model as intermediate model as a lot of people can be fooled by it, i.e. the Government presents this as a service. False logic as people give to government, without that they are nothing. If people give to charity, probably a fraction of 1% goes to the cause, much more going into destroying the benefit of that 1%. Neither of those options helps people.

On the freemason issue, I presume Saddam Hussein is alive, I have a range of corroboration details to support that view. No idea where but for the sake of a swag I would guess France.

As for helpless queenofit, not so at all. You are thinking, researching, posting and taking part. No question that you have a great deal to offer, you do, that is demonstrated.

There are thoughts I have and as I have them I know that others will be working on the same lines, that is often significant. As for helpless, for a hyperthetical argument, imagine things were, what should you do, bury your head in the sand or live, really live. Life itself is the journey not the end.

If you analyse what has been going on, you will actually find the number of key operatives are small so if you thought a few people couldn't change the world, look again.
dave

Posted: Jan 30 2008, 7:32 AM

Link
Pleased to hear things are better there yankinoz though language creates a lot of common culture and when I was monitoring things the same manufactured news to create policy were deployed in oz, though not to the same degree as UK or US.

Although no accidents, things go wrong, very wrong. Iran snagged, 9/11 they got caught which pretty much opened pandoras box. I remember long ago tubes being shipped to iraq by british intelligence (the manufacturers were in contact with them). An MP blew the whistle, I presume his subsequent death no accident but truth came out in public as a consequence. They have to plan, rely on people not knowing what is going on and they cannot possibly have wanted so much to be known. They say in a war you must know your enemy, well 9/11 blew their cover like nothing before. I had a friend I would chat to, not involved in this, but just from the reporting pattern on terrorism, he would know it was a hoax before the story came out in any detail.

It must be a lot more comfortable lying where that lie is allowed some dignity. If a politician has their lips moving, the media has any story, they are up to something and are up to no good. Even on the inside it has changed, people believed they were journalists etc. Truth is pouring out.

As for people watching fox, all rather good. Just imagine when those people find out what fox really is.

I wouldn't like to be Lord Stephens running a cover up when so many people know you are lying. If you stand for a principle, you don't have to worry if the whole world disagrees with you but if you are just lying, there is some very difficult self denial to maintain. Say he reads this post he can't sue because even if has an ego the size of london advisors would tell him he would be finished in court. He can send his fit up boys out, he has thousands who will listen, he can ask for a black op but although I wouldn't put it past him to try, he cannot change truth that has been and gone.
dave

Posted: Jan 30 2008, 7:59 AM

Link
Incidentally, an important issue arises in the MP that blew the whistle on what is now the opposition. Normally they are all incriminated and controlled by secrets. Just like the FBI keep files on everyone to control them, the same happens in the UK but this MP was different. He lived a lively lifestyle, would go to bed with the mother, the daughter but he wasn't vulnerable to manipulation because instead of these things being secret he published a book on it.

So if you were someone who has say committed murder, or even a few of them, that is simply the truth. You can only be influenced if the lie is more important than the truth to you. The Kennedies called the bluff of the FBI files, hence such a public execution, but there is nothing to learn from that, he tried to do the right thing and if more did, they can't go murdering everyone on the streets of Dallas and fooling the public.

Much of life is a bluff. Imagine a man arrives at your door in the middle of the night and flashes his fbi card and you think uh oh, this is some serious business. If instead you research, you might think I know those people, they were involved in two attempts on blowing up the twin towers. The gun, all the toys, the most they rely on is the mind control of the lie. They are actors, they are acting the bad guys, that changes quite a lot. If someone says to you they are a police officer and you don't believe that nonsense, they have a chance to think, they can be a human being or carry on acting. If everyone would stop acting, that leaves only a few zealots, and even some of them might find a way back to the land of the living.

People have been living the lie. Living the truth is much easier, much less effort for everyone. It wouldn't be a case of having huge problems to sort out, doing the right thing is much easier.
dave

Posted: Jan 30 2008, 8:43 PM

Link
Yankinoz, in terms of false pretenses, real terrorists, it is perhaps appropriate to include an Australian example. On the instructions of Mrs. Windsor of Buckingham Palace, the Australian prime minister, police, immigration, secret services and chief prosecutor were trying a man in court in secret and they made their case in collusion with Rupert Murdoch and the International media along with supporting statements from the Crown Police in the UK, This was at the time being used in an attempt to terrorise the British people.

It was refreshing to see a defence lawyer of integrity and wit in English speaking nations, but this one did the right and intelligent thing and leaked the case and it became public knowledge. I don't think the expression translates into American, but this was what is called in the UK a fit up. The case being used by the prime minister of Australia to terrorise and enslave the inhabitants of that nation and it was a wilful fraud, it was a matter of evidence that the crown and all the aforementioned agencies and operatives in Australia and the UK police were lying, the case being a political fabrication.

In attempting to wilfully convict an innocent man of terrorism who was muslim this was a racial attack. After this fraud was exposed the Australian authorities insisted on continuing to prosecute that the man was in Australia illegally and the evidence was he had no passport. It was leaked further by the defense that the immigration services had confiscated the man's passport on the instructions of the crown and thus he had entered legally and they, the Australian state had committed kidnap.

Australia is demonstrably unwell, to support the allegation this was an assault on the Australian people I can site further cases covering each state in that colony. The case sited was covered and exposed in the mockingbird media so should be verifiable on the net.
dave

Posted: Jan 30 2008, 9:19 PM

Link
<queenofit and How far off?>
The populations of the UK and US are a problem for the global tyranny agenda, and I am expecting that current plans are to attempt to convert the UK into an overt police state during 2008. It is already a police state but that has not been realised and accepted in relation to the populous as a whole due to mind control in various guises.

In America they conducted a large field trial at disarming and relocating large numbers of people following the Katrina incident after what is was reported as explosive demolition of the levees and subsequent flooding. Although this experiment using international forces was generally successful, the public too become wiser from experience and of all things, this was the issue that ripped the mask of Bush and the rest of the CFR in the White House.

The planned terrorist assault against Iran has not gone to plan A. There are fractures within the system, there is public activity at this time. I presume the Rothschilds are mndset locked and continue to prepare for their theatricals.
Formal challenges are in play as I write this though the media will of course divert rather than cover this. 2008 looks to me to be the year when as they say, the s**t will hit the fan. Short of agents of the empire being willing to discuss peace terms, I do not see that the UK can continue as is beyond 2008.

I haven't checked the north american union date, if one is published as official I see no reason to believe it as true. Things are volatile and dynamic, although they like their special dates, this time the Rothschilds and the occultists as a whole.will themselves have to take on board issues which are now extremely volatile.

Truth is now on the march, something so many people didn't even know they were missing, such is the nature of a hidden war.
YankInOz

Posted: Jan 31 2008, 2:06 AM

Link
Dave - your reference to the Muslim Doctor from the Gold Coast and him being fit up... when the lid came off that one - the Australian public was really angry. I think it was truly one of the nails in Little Johnny Howard's political coffin because he did not step in a stop the whole fiasco. When they couldn't pin the "terrorist" tail on his backside they tried to nail him for immigration violation. What a complete knock up. Haneef (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Haneef) was finally vindicated and he loves Australia so much, he wants to return and work here. Well, if I had a choice between India and Australia and I was a doctor... hmmmm let me see.

Previous adventures for the military in SEA in the mid 60s taught me how this game is played. I flew Air Sea Rescue from outside - in and did more "humanitarian" work then saw the battle. We sure carried quite a few shiny bricks for private placement. That's a whole nuther story! But I site it here, because I want people to know that the missing money in Iraq is no accident, the implication that there was no plan for Iraq after the invasion is total BS. The Brits had things well in hand in the South and the US was following the Disaster Capitalism process - until the Iraqi people found out that all of their property was to be confiscated. that is when the liberators became the enemy!

Spin - spin - spin... The Gangs in Rome, Paris and London just don't want us to have freedom! Oh, by the way, we lost $7.4 BILLION dollars in bad trades. Sorry! You can't loose paper trades. You can hedge them. which is probably what really happened and this kid is the fall guy.

I have a friend here in Oz who has made about $15 million - so far on the "crash"... all programmed. He sits on the beach - with WiFi and watches the money flow in. You cannot loose value - you can only loose your share of the value. Someone else is winning and the "reduction" of value in the share market has just gone in hiding by moving to another market. I wonder how the arbitrage hedge funds in Luxembourg are doing.

By the way, today 31 January 2008) is the 70 year anniversary of when Hitler came into power. funny there was a global economic crisis on then and he stepped in to tell everyone he had the answer. We know that the current US administration's leader had a Grand-Daddy who politically, philosophically and financially supported the Third Reich and in fact the neo-con message is very "Reichian" (may be a new word, aye?)

I wonder what is next. KRudd here in Oz may be a bit of a worry and a bit of a leader. He wants to help and control. I keep getting mixed signals on his intentions. We shall see.

I am am just wondering who McCain's running mate will be - that is the person who will step into the North American Union shoes. And will McCain be around for one term - much less two. If you haven't figured out that it will probably be McCain then you need to watch Being There with Peter Sellers and Shirley McLaine. Then you will understand the power behind the power.

Dave - thanks for the dialogue. And BTW, I speek Straine and a bit of Pommie - so no worries, Mate.

Yes, truth is on the march. It is the only real sword we have.
dave

Posted: Jan 31 2008, 11:21 AM

Link
The public side of politics is not much different from American Football, in Oz the same, it is not the public who decide who gets stuck out front. As for Howard, it wasn't decided by the public he was finished, how all that was presented explains quite well how the world is manipulated, public opinion included. As for your new zealand neighbours, an ex kgb colleague of Putin's is pm.

None of this is real, the link didn't work but the evidence was fabricated, this was in the documents hidden by the court, and conspiracy evidenced that embraced many of the agencies of state. Who went to jail, the judge, the prosecutor, the police, immigration, the government, security services, the courts, the british police and security services etc? None of them went to court, if there was a legitimate administration in Oz there would be equality of arms and they would all have gone to court. That stuff is a game, a real one in that real people get killed. The Australian military deployed to Iraq, they are just soldiers of missfortune.

As for Iraq, the plan appears to be and have been to destroy Iraq, get rid of most of the people and sit there until the oil runs out, with a number of side operations thrown in; destruction of ancient knowledge and compromising evidence (I can't remember how many times they bombed the information ministry), racial and religious provocation, experiments in technique and technology etc.
dave

Posted: Jan 31 2008, 11:33 AM

Link
Just returned from an illumaniti front, blood is running a little hot here. Round 1 in their favour but Rome wasn't demolished in one day. I don't know what asylum laws are, but I claim political and religious asylum from planet earth. It is very much like an asylum I visited years ago, the 'patients' were some of the nicest people I have ever met, the staff all had that weird look in their eyes.

I presume Oz is getting the meds, are the chemtrails running out there yankinoz? A pilot I spoke to said they are doing it here in France.
Comments 1 - 13 of 13 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

North Carolina Deputy Snatches Two Phones, Fails to Snatch Third, as she Handcuffs Man for no Reason - 04/22Chinese Citizens Beat Government Bureaucrats During Mass Riot - 04/21Police Beat Up Entire Wedding Party, Ruin Pro Baseball Player's Career - 04/21Bunkerville Was Not the BLM's First Rustler's Roundup - 04/22Cop Swerves His SUV Into Longboarders To Enforce $35 Bylaw Violation - 04/14Man Attacked By Cop For Asking Question - 04/22The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return - 04/07With Government Roads, the Customer Is Always Wrong - 04/22

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top