The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Analysis posted Feb 27 2007, 11:18 AM Category: Cover-Up/Deceptions Source: Information Liberation Print

Another Smoking Gun? Now CNN Jumps the Gun: On 911 CNN Announced WTC 7 "Has Either Collapsed or is Collapsing" Over an Hour Before it Fell

Chris | Information Liberation

In an amazing redux, new video has been unearthed of a CNN report on the day of 911 in which a CNN anchor announces they have received word that WTC 7 is on fire and "has either collapsed or is collapsing." The problem with this is that WTC 7 is clearly visible behind the anchor.

This report was carried at "about 4:15 eastern daylight time" (according to the anchor), over an hour before the building actually collapsed at 5:20. Who told them the WTC 7 building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."? Keep in mind he did not say it was going to collapse, he said it either had or was in the process of doing so. The anchor says is "we are getting information now", who is giving him this information? If you pay close attention you can see after the anchor announces this he turns around and sees the building as clear as day still standing, he then proceeds to backtrack on the initial information which informed him clearly the building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."

This report is doubled in significance seeing as it comes on the heels of a report that BBC announced that WTC 7 had collapsed over 20 minutes before it actually fell. Both of the anchors were told the building had collapsed, the question is who told them?

Surely, some will say they knew the building was going to collapse because it was on fire. This claim holds no water due to the fact no steel building has ever collapsed due to fire. For example in 2005 the Madrid Sky Scraper was a towering inferno for hours on end and it did not come close to collapsing.


In order to understand the full significance of this video it needs to be put in context.

Firstly, a poll was conducted in 2006 which showed 42% of Americans were unaware a third building, WTC 7, collapsed on 911(PDF). Considering how many thousands of times the twin towers were shown collapsing on television, that in itself is extremely significant. There is, of course, a reason 42% of Americans do not know the story of WTC 7. If you watch the video below you will find out.

Secondly, there is smoking gun video of the owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, admitting on a PBS documentary he ordered the building "Pulled" which is an industry term for demolished.

Larry Silverstein made billions off the collapse of the building as reported here.
Larry “Lucky Larry” Silverstein

You’ve got to be lucky to make $4 Billion killing on a 6-month investment of $124 Million.

Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had EVER changed ownership.

Mr. Silverstein’s first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin’s cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines — two key players in the 9/11 attacks.

...Continued here.
Additionally, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who was in WTC 7 before it collapsed, admitted on ABC news he was warned the buildings were going to collapse.
I .. I went down to the scene and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna' to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.
This is just a small sampling of the evidence for those who want to know the truth of what happened that day. For those who wish to avoid the truth I leave you with this quote to ponder...

"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich, "The Murder of Christ"

Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Did #Mizzou Protestor Jonathan Butler Lie About Being Hit by UM President's Car?
- Sports Military Worship Propaganda Exposed -- Senate Report Admits Millions Spent On PsyOp
- Corbett On New Iraq War Docs
- Fake CIA Agent For FOX News Has Spewed Horse S**t For 12 Years, and Americans Were Eating It Up
- US Forces in Afghanistan Knew Kunduz Site Was Hospital - AP Report
- The Mystery of ISIS' Toyota Army Solved
- The Gender Wage Gap -- A Myth That (Still) Just Won't Die
- State Department 'Planted' Anti-Wikileaks Questions For 60 Minutes Interview With Julian Assange

Comments 1 - 18 of 18 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 12:47 PM

69179 How many more videos of other coverage has prior knowledge?

Posted: Feb 27 2007, 4:07 PM

89138 More Mistakes Made:
1. Bush saw the first plane hit live on tv: (1min)
2. Rumsfeld Says Flight 93 was shot down: (30sec)
3. NYC Mayor Slips-
4. Larry Silverstein CLAIM WTC 7 Pulled:

Posted: Feb 28 2007, 1:15 PM

71111 If we can't break the double think nothing will ever happen about this

Posted: Feb 28 2007, 3:18 PM


What we need now is a number of class actions organized by stockholders in the vast number of insurance companies, which had to shell out money to make Larry the "Lucky Larry".

This kind of accident cannot result in payment of the insured amount unless there is clear evidence that it is in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy.

In that connection they can ask names of those who took out put options, etc. etc.

If satisfactory evidence is not made available, they have to go after "Lucky Larry". He, his crooked friends and the whole criminal network can count their lucky days numbered!
joop van de swaluw

Posted: Feb 28 2007, 3:53 PM

62166 As it happened I knew that it very suspicious.Especially that the the so-caleed hijacked were not noticed by Norad. Later Prof. Stevens convinced me that it was an inside job. The debris came from inside the buildings: this is not possible because a plane takes the debris with it to inside of the building!
Planes don't pulverize concrete; the fine dust falling on cars,etc, is caused by huge explosions. Even the designer said that these planes couldn't bring these buildings. Newton's Laws and F=MxA moved the buildings. You need these Laws in physics to move anything, even to drink your cup of coffee.
The debris= evidence of the crime committed, was removed quickly and shipped to China they say. I don't believe the 'official' story of the Federal Commission. Too many questions are unanswered. Regards,Joop.

Posted: Feb 28 2007, 9:55 PM

24115 Yes inside job no doubt about it.

Posted: Mar 01 2007, 2:58 PM

6857 It is amazing that we are the 1's called crazy even after people watch all the evidence and cover-up of 9/11. America is under attack but its our government . How are they gonna de-bunk all this video evidence????? Wake up people !!!!!!!! Steel buildings dont fall from fire.....fema in nyc the night before......hole in pentagon 2 small....BBC and CNN reported that building 7 fell or was about 2 before it fell is just amazing evidence that some1 knew ...ect......ect........ect........Iran soon if we dont stop this power monger !!!!

Posted: Mar 02 2007, 12:19 PM

69152 what was that thing that looks like a fireball while he's saying well you can see...." ?
Keaves Sharpy

Posted: Mar 03 2007, 9:13 AM

2169 The real question, the one that is not asked nearly often enough, is this: What is to be done about this? We're at a point now where these web sites are merely "speaking to the quoir" and not accomplishing much. We know that demonstrations accomplish nothing when held in "free speech zones" and "freedom cages."
One thing I've begun doing is burning some copies of 911 videos for people who are unfamiliar with the truth. I fear that simply getting the word out, however, is not nearly enough.

Posted: Mar 03 2007, 10:12 AM

70178 just keep educating and PREPARE FOR THE WORST

Posted: Apr 26 2007, 6:24 PM

64183 "What we need now is a number of class actions organized by stockholders in the vast number of insurance companies, which had to shell out money to make Larry the "Lucky Larry".

This kind of accident cannot result in payment of the insured amount unless there is clear evidence that it is in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy.

In that connection they can ask names of those who took out put options, etc. etc.

If satisfactory evidence is not made available, they have to go after "Lucky Larry". He, his crooked friends and the whole criminal network can count their lucky days numbered! ""

That is a great point. Especially when there is plenty of evidence showing 9/11 was an inside job. Which would make his insurance policies void.

Posted: Apr 26 2008, 2:26 PM

68195 We're finished.

Posted: Apr 26 2008, 5:39 PM

I wonder, could it be that the" building "which was set to go down, was supposed to have been hit (by something else) that malfunctioned, and they "pulled" it anyway.

That thought just came to me.

Keaves Sharpy, you asked "I fear that simply getting the word out, however, is not nearly enough.''

That is my concern, I feel like the little sheep out in the field, grazing on the grass, while the "sheepherder" is preparing for our slaughter.

I read lots of different sites, it seems more folks wake up to this, but so what? We are wide awake and still waiting for the slaughter. (figuratively speaking)

Posted: Apr 26 2008, 5:41 PM

I meant to say "building 7" oops.

Posted: Sep 08 2009, 4:47 AM


Posted: Aug 15 2011, 6:56 PM

69251 you have such brother wants attach on you and your future. it is shame.

don't living the dream which is your brother prepare for you.

use your own mind.

Posted: Mar 29 2012, 10:35 AM

69114 Top 9/11 September 11 Conspiracy Cold Case Solved: Flight 175 was faked 2012 (case closed):

Flight 175 was 100% removed from 3,160 file FOIA release because it would not have shown flight 175. i.e Two examples of this exists 1. the Jaron Rubenstein Folder 2. Carmen Taylor folder

Carmen Taylor: Missing FLIGHT 175 FOIA Files 9/11 Conspiracy Plane Investigation

Jaron Rubenstein: Missing FLIGHT 175 FOIA Files 9/11 Conspiracy Plane Investigation

Posted: Feb 03 2013, 1:54 PM

65129 Not really a smoking gun, you are talking about CNN.
Comments 1 - 18 of 18 Page 1 of 1

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving - 11/30Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government - 11/30The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance - 11/30Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement - 11/30New Photos Show Chicago Cops On Burger King CPU Where Laquan McDonald Shooting Footage 'Disappeared' - 12/01Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department - 11/30Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27LA to Scan All Cars, Publicly Shame Anyone Who Drives Through a 'Prostitution Area' - 11/30

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up