informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Feb 09 2006, 3:35 PM Category: Politics/Corruption Source: Daily Chronicle Print

Senator Conrad Burns' office may have tampered with Wikipedia entry: Removed references to a comment Burns made in 1999 calling Arabs "ragheads"


Someone from Sen. Conrad Burns' office apparently edited the senator's entry on the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia in January to remove a controversial remark he had made about Arabs, the Web site reported Tuesday.

A recent investigation by Wikinews -- Wikipedia's fact-checking service -- found that an unknown editor using an Internet protocol address assigned to the Republican senator's office removed references to a comment Burns made in 1999 calling Arabs "ragheads" and his voting record on Native American issues.

The same person then inserted a glowing paragraph describing the senator as a "voice for the farmer."

Wikipedia is an open-source encyclopedia that allows anyone with a Web connection to edit its articles, a feature that has led critics to question the accuracy of its content.

Regardless, Wikipedia remains one of the most popular sites on the Web and is the place where many Internet users turn when looking up information.

Search for "Conrad Burns" with Google and the Wikipedia article is the second link to show up among 432,000 hits, right after the senator's official Web site.

Burns' spokesman James Pendleton dismissed Wikinews' findings when asked about it Wednesday, pointing to the site's open-source nature.

"They have exactly zero credibility," he said. "Because there is no fact-checking, anybody can go in and put in whatever they want."

Wikipedia has long been a battleground for image-conscious political activists of all stripes. Any articles even hinting at politics are routinely edited by Internet users to remove bias, both real and perceived.

Wikinews recently investigated edits coming from the IP addresses of U.S. Senate offices. It found that the vast majority of edits were actually helpful, Wikinews correspondent Wayne Saewyc said.

"A very small number of them were not," he said.

Among the questionable edits were the ones coming from an IP address linked to Burns' office. Wikinews attempted to contact the senator's staff about the changes, but phone calls were not returned.

Burns' office was not the only one that Wikinews attempted to contact about head-scratching edits. The others were the offices of Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware, Norm Coleman of Minnesota, Dianne Feinstein of California and Tom Harkin of Iowa.

The Burns article has since been returned to its original format.





Latest Politics/Corruption
- A Congressman who Doesn't Cotton to the Constitution
- "You're Out Of Order! We're Asking You To Leave!"
- Piers Morgan: Now I See U.S. Government Tyranny
- CISPA Sponsor Mike Rogers May Go On To Lead The FBI
- Obama Supporter Chevy Chase Justifies Gitmo
- Obama Supporter Stevie Wonder Justifies Obama's Gitmo & Wars
- Obama Tells Graduates to Reject Warnings Of Tyranny
- Colo. Politicians Threaten to Repeal Marijuana Legalization If Voters Don't Approve High Taxes









No Comments Posted Add Comment


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

'I really thought I was going to die' - 05/23Video: City Changes Parking Signs, Tickets Cars That Were Parked Legally - 05/23So It's Come To This: Seven High School Students Arrested For Throwing... Water Balloons - 05/23And Then They Came For Me: The Black Bagging of Adam Kokesh - 05/24'Don't interact, don't talk, they are not humans' – Gitmo guard's basic orders - 05/23Bill Nye, Global Warming Opportunist Guy - 05/23Undercover Narco Befriends, then Busts, Autistic Teenager - 05/24The Full Uncensored Version Of London Woolwish Murderer's Interview - 05/24

Cop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The ThroatWhen the Right to Resist Becomes the "Duty to Submit"
(more)

 
Top