informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...


An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand
Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"
The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future
(more)
Article posted Sep 01 2006, 11:44 PM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: Free-market.net Print

THE NEW CENSUS: An All-Out Assault On Your Privacy


The federal government has quietly begun using an incredibly intrusive new census form called "The American Community Survey." Up to 1 million households a year will receive this form.

This new "census" form is 24-pages long, and demands that you lay bare every detail of your life, including how much you earn, what your home is worth, details of your health, when you leave for work, previous addresses, pregnancies, monies received from government, and on and on.

I say demand because you can be fined up to $1,000 for each of the 72 questions you don�t answer or which you answer "incorrectly." However, so far no one has been fined for not answering, nor are they likely to be if public resistance is strong.

The ways the government could use this information to harm you are mind-boggling. For instance, any financial discrepancy with IRS or Social Security records could result in your criminal prosecution. Knowing when you leave for work could enable police, acting under the Patriot Act, to secretly enter your home.

The American Community Survey also demands that you to report on the activities of relatives, employers and roommates. Joseph Stalin could hardly ask for more surveillance powers. You can download the survey at www.census.gov/acs/www/

Article I of the Constitution allows the government to conduct a count of the American people once every ten years to determine voting districts. Nothing in the Constitution gives government the power to continuously spy on the people or probe every intimate detail of their lives.

As Congressman Ron Paul observes, questions on the American Community Survey are "both ludicrous and insulting," and this information is simply none of the government's business. I fervently hope that millions of Americans will burn their forms or accidentally lose them.


SHARE:



Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Video: As Usual, MSM Gushingly "Predicts" Our Fascist Future
- Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
- Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
- Philly Mayor Defends Tax on Bloggers
- 4th Amendment Violating Mobile X-Ray Scanners Hit The Streets
- Government: Secretly Watching Students Not a Crime
- TSA scares and violates child's personal space, X-rays her teddy bear
- Government Using Google Earth To Loot Destitute Americans









Comments 1 - 20 of 38 Add Comment Page of 2 >
J-Bonnes

Posted: Sep 02 2006, 2:20 AM

Link
Write nunya (none your damn business) across the census form and send it in. They can't fine the people they impoverish. Say no to national ID cards. Say no to forced vaccinations of children and adults. Repeal the unpatriot act 1 and 2 and get the bushs out of office. No more Clintons or Kerrys or Bushes and use a write in ballot with a receipt for your records. No more professional politicians elect grassroot individuals who genuinely care about the issues and no dibold electronic voting machines. No new world order and last but not least close the borders to all immigration until an appointment only process is in place to allow the legal flow of immigrants that can be monitored by americans not americans being monitored by government..
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 05 2006, 12:29 AM

Link
67103 Please cite statue where the 1 grand per question fine can be imposed. I received one of these surveys, after looking up the statute, and the determined that fine, which as I read it was $100 for refusal to answer and $500 for willful misinformation for the *whole* survey. The questions were definitely none of the government's business, but when the very persistant census lady finally caught up with me and I told her that I prefered paying the 100 dollar fine to answering the questions, she was very accomodating in sugesting that I simply not answer any of the questions I didn't want to answer. So I took her up on that and answered only about 50% of the questions.

The form does state that the law requires that you completly answer the questions, but I think that if they wanted to really scare folks into performing this they would have mentioned the huge potential for fines. Not that I don't agree this form is largely BS (some of the questions did seem like basic civic service type info as opposed to privacy invasion), but I do think that we should be more careful about hyperbole regarding the stronf arm tactics being used. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Anonymous

Posted: Dec 03 2006, 8:13 PM

Link
12175 We got one of those forms and I thought the law said that you only had to tell them how many people lived there so I blew it off. Then we started to get phone calls asking why we hadnt returned it. After about six weeks I still hadnt returned it so they kept calling and sent me another one. So I did the mature thing i filled it out in crayon (figuring govt intelligence was a contradiction) and verry messy
Litheinil

Posted: Jul 11 2007, 10:27 PM

Link
71235 I got one just the other day. I thought the census was in 2000? Why am I getting this thing in 2007?
David

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 3:11 AM

Link
71104 What you aren't told in this article is that anything at all that is filled out in the survey is confidential and that if the information is used in any way besides making statistics that are not personally identifiable, the person who missused the information and the person who was in charge of keeping your personal information confidential (these people are assigned based on addresses, not names) have a mandatory minimum jailtime sentence of 25 years.

and there are ongoing censuses all the time. it is with the censuses that we know what the unemployment rate is or the birth rate or about the amount of violent crimes that aren't reported to the police etc.

I know someone who works for the census bureau and that person told me that an interviewee was selling heroine during the interview but due to the confidentiality that person could not get in trouble. even illegal aliens can't get in trouble for admitting their illegal status in an interview, first because the cases are set up so they can't be traced back to an individual, and second because the purpose of the statistics is to direct social programs not to undermine our constitution.

Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 3:12 AM

Link
7162 I think I have received this, I tossed it since I knew the census was in 2000 and i didn't hear about another one.

Presumed it was junk. OH WELL.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 4:14 AM

Link
66116 I got one a while back... and then they kept calling me and calling me.... just happened to be during a time of family crisis...

Then they started calling again, and said they sent it twice... I said I hadn't gotten it... they said I could be fined... and I said "Did you send it registered? Prove I received it..."

I finally filled it out and sent it in... it's was insane.... and Ron Paul is right... burn it if you get it.... it's a total invasion of your privacy.....
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 4:30 AM

Link
7162 I never filled mine out. Got a few copies late last year. Until I read this I just though (ala Occams Razor) that it was a phishing scam or something similar. Since I only have a cell phone i never got any calls.

I wonder if i should be waiting for the $72k fine now?
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 6:00 AM

Link
69230 The fine is $100 to $5000

Here is the link to the site:
http://www.census.gov/acs/www/SBasics/What/What1.htm

Sample form is here:
http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/SQuest08.pdf
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 6:09 AM

Link
68209 This "article" is misleading. The author has either failed to do research or must simply be lying. David is on the money in his comment. Lots of folks think the census is an invasion of privacy. I think so. However, the idea that the government uses the info it gets from the census in a personally identifiable way to enforce any law is just not the case. Use google.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 9:26 AM

Link
209208 @David and others who thing this type of thing is ok
So you say they cant use it for anything illegal? Because the government wouldnt do that of course! The government never does anything against the law. You know like torture? Or lying about a certain country having WMD? Well I guess we are all safe know since David says so. Thanks David!
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 10:41 AM

Link
216171 Do not question the Staatssicherheit. To question the Stasi is treason.

Sorry for introducing Godwin's law, but when is enough enough?

On the note of memes: Vote for Ron Paul
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 10:54 AM

Link
76174 IF ONE SHOWS UP IN MY MAILBOX I WILL USE IT FOR TOILET PAPER.
NinjaMidget

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 10:58 AM

Link
6433 The actual legal code is located here:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=browse_usc&docid=Cite:+13USC221

You'll notice that the fine cannot exceed $100, unless you are specifically (and willfully) answering a question incorrectly. See: Providing information that is false; instead of refusing to answer the question. I hope Digg people actually read the full comments to this article instead of the over-the-top exaggeration in this article.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 12:15 PM

Link
192154 I love the argument that because it is illegal for the government to use this information, it means they won’t do it. Last time I checked we were down a few constitutional amendments with this administration's "Patriot Act". Sorry but if they have no regard for the Bill Of Rights, I am not holding my breath that they won’t misuse this info if it is convenient for them.
Bentley Ptythylhlyl

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 12:25 PM

Link
12989 Entreprenurial bureaucrats want to pimp your marketing data to advertising companies who pay less postage than you and get more welfare than the poorest private citizens. They think they're doing the government's "business" but they're just handing over the data to the secret police listening in on NSA communications intercepts. Private citizens are second-class citizens compared to corporations, which have all the rights of private individuals but more power of the purse. The government profits through a monopoly on privacy, the most valuable "trade secret" in the information economy. Your stats are gold; it doesn't matter that all the junk mail you get is thrown right into the trash, what matters is simply that it is sent.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 12:34 PM

Link
71160 Does the law say anything about the condition the census form has to be in when you send it in? If not, I say fill it out, then burn the damn thing, stir the ashes in cat shit, and mail it back to the bastards.
WeirdDogLady

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 1:45 PM

Link
83233 Just don't answer. That's what I did for the last census and nothing at all happened. Repeat. Nothing at all happened.
Joe

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 1:54 PM

Link
204108 Its only an invasion of privacy if you are forced to give up the information or the information is taken from you. If you give up the information on an optional supplement to the survey its not an invasion of privacy.
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 07 2008, 2:03 PM

Link
71170 I got one refused to fill it out and told them repeatly to send me the fine and I would pay it. Kept getting phone calls then someone show up on my doorsteps to "help me" fill it out and I said send me the fine then kept getting letters from supervisors on how important it was to fill out and then higher up supervisors showed up on my doorsteps and I said send me the fine. Every single time they would ask the preprogrammed question "What do you object to?" and I always answered the same I object to my tax money being wasted and I object to people who can't accept that the answer is no.

Got very heated many times when people showed up. Totally waste of money.
Comments 1 - 20 of 38 Page of 2 >


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

10 Signs The U.S. is Becoming a Third World Country - 08/16SHOCK VIDEO: Alaska State Trooper Grabs at Citizen's Cell Phone Camera During Routine Traffic Stop! - 08/16Government Roid Rage Returns - 08/20Life for Half an Ounce of Medical Marijuana? - 08/12Video: NYPD Undercover Cop Threatens Cameraman with Rape - 08/19Video: Valedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling - 08/12California surfer films great white sharks circling his board - 08/12Murder a Kid, Plant a Gun -- Take a Vacation - 08/11

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human CivilizationValedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling in Graduation SpeechFeds Ignore Due Process, First Amendment, Shut Down 73,000 BlogsObama Administration Announces Massive Piracy CrackdownNew Bill Gives Obama 'Kill Switch' To Shut Down The InternetThe "Tax Mahal": A Shrine to Corporate SocialismBilderberg 2010: Between the sword and the wallObama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial
(more)

 
Top