The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Sep 03 2005, 8:57 AM Source: Tom Barrett Print

Top Salvation Army Commissioner salary: $13,000 per year plus housing -- President of the United Way: $375,000 base salary plus benefits -- Red Cross President: $450,000 plus benefits.

Christmas is the time of the year when we give the most to charity. Perhaps it is because it is a joyful season, and our hearts are open. Perhaps it is because as we look back over the year about to end, we realize how richly God has blessed us. Perhaps the reason is something as pragmatic as tax deductions. Whatever our motivation, it is essential, more than ever, that we be able to trust the charity to which we give our hard-earned dollars.

If we have learned anything since 9/11 regarding charities, it is “Giver, beware!” Hundreds of new charities sprang up in the wake of the terrorist attacks. Many, if not most, were scams. Movie stars and musicians lent their names and support to fund-raising activities and events, only to find that the money raised did not go where the givers intended it to go.

Even the “Super Charities,” the United Way and the Red Cross had reason to hang their heads in shame. The Red Cross did a much better job of getting donated money to victims than did the United Way. The United Way withheld donations from victims of the disasters for months, finally yielding to public pressure. But both organizations raised money in the name of the disaster victims, and then diverted them to other purposes. And both organizations were exposed for paying huge executive salaries.

One charity has stayed above all this for 137 years. The Salvation Army is unique among all U.S. charities for many reasons. Let’s start at the top. Commissioner Todd Bassett receives a salary just $13,000 per year (plus housing) for managing this $2 Billion dollar organization. By comparison, Brian Gallagher, President of the United Way receives a $375,000 base salary (plus numerous expensive benefits) and the Red Cross President Marsha Evans receives $450,000 plus benefits.

Since the Salvation Army pays its leader only about 3% of what the other big charities pay, one might expect that it would be less efficient than the other charities. Not according to the experts. The Army’s website ( contains the following evaluation by one of the nation’s most trusted management experts, Professor Peter Drucker:

“Identified by author and management expert Dr. Peter Drucker as ‘by far the most effective organization in the United States,’ The Salvation Army invests the charitable gifts it receives in the lives of men and women and boys and girls. ‘No one even comes close to it in respect to clarity of mission, ability to innovate, measurable results, dedication and putting money to maximum use,’ Drucker said. (Forbes, August 11, 1997).”

In stark contrast to the scandals generated by other charities in the aftermath of 9/11, the Salvation Army went about quietly ministering to the victims of the terrorist attacks, as well as the rescuers and other volunteers. According to an article about the Salvation Army in the December issue of Reader’s Digest, “With a half-hour of the terrorist attacks, 200 officers in their epaulet jackets and blue caps started scrambling to Ground Zero, soon assisted by 5,000 more volunteers.” The Army commandeered 24 buildings from which to receive and distribute tons of relief supplies. Disaster experts consider the Salvation Army’s work in Manhattan and Washington, DC, to be the most effective of any of the relief organizations involved.

More than 20% of U.S. charities spend over 40% of the money they receive on administrative costs. In other words, only 60 cents of every dollar you donate to these charities is used for the intended charitable purpose. The rest goes to overhead, which in many cases includes unconscionable executive salaries. By contrast, 83 cents of every dollar you throw into one of the Salvation Army’s red Christmas kettles goes directly to helping people in need.

In addition to its well-known mission of providing food and shelter to the needy, the Salvation Army serves children through its boys and girls centers, helps alcoholics and drug addicts find freedom, and ministers to people in nursing homes, hospitals, and prisons. It is every bit as active as the Red Cross in disaster relief. In fact, the Army has provided assistance at every U.S. disaster since the Galveston hurricane in 1900. Over all, they served over 38 million people last year.

Why does this charity stand head and shoulders above all other U.S. charities? Perhaps it is the fact that it is not actually a charity. The Salvation Army is in reality an evangelical Protestant Church. Their more than 9,000 centers across our nation contain sanctuaries where officers (who are all ordained ministers) conduct Sunday services. Their religious affiliation contributes to their incredible efficiency as a charity in several ways:

** Members of their local churches give to support their local centers. This reduces overhead and makes the charitable donations go further.

** Army officers consider themselves missionaries, and are in fact paid less than many foreign missionaries. Their real compensation is the knowledge that they are doing God’s work in this world. The fact that they are willing to serve for so little means that several workers can be supported by the dollars that other organizations would pay to one person.

** Hundreds of thousands of volunteers, with the same motivations as the officers, serve with no pay. In many cases, they pay their own expenses for food and travel so that donated funds can be used to help the needy.

The bottom line is that the Salvation Army is so effective because the officers and volunteers don’t look at what they do as a job. They are shepherds caring for the flock. They do what they do not for a paycheck, but because of their love for God and for the people they serve.

I hope that as you shop this year you will think of this article every time you see one of the Salvation Army’s distinctive red kettles. I hope you will remember the good work this wonderful organization has done for more than a century. I hope that you will realize that there are very good reasons that this is one of the most trusted organizations of its kind in the world. And I hope that you will toss a buck in the pot. Or a five. Or a ten. Or a twenty. Check your wallet carefully. Maybe there’s a fifty or a hundred dollar bill in there!

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Dec 10 2010, 10:33 AM

745 This article is absolute BS. Todd Bassett, Head of the Salvation Army, received around $186,000 for his 2003 salary (Forbes magazine). This article also mentions nothing of how much the Salvation Army spends it's donation funds in lobbying for anti-gay and evangelical agenda legislation.


Posted: Nov 16 2012, 7:40 PM

74195 I give my money to the Salvation Army and when I could I gave my time to who ever needed it in communications. The SA is there with good free food and the Red Cross charges for stale donuts and fair coffee.

To be fair to the Red Cross the local director is responsible for a lot of the fund raising but they pay the duds just like the good performers. The red Cross does good work the Salvation Army does better.

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving - 11/30Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance - 11/30Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement - 11/30Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government - 11/30Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department - 11/30Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder - 11/27Georgia Sheriff Puts Up Sign Warning People Who Disagree With Him About God to Leave - 11/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up