Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell Highlights Massive Inconsistencies In Christine Ford's TestimonyChris Menahan
Oct. 01, 2018
Hondurans Paint Swastika On American Flag, Set It On Fire; Wave Honduran Flags, Give Us The Finger
Gaetz: Video Shows Cash Being Handed Out to Honduran Migrant Caravan Headed For U.S.
Leftist Site Which Cheered The Banning Of Alex Jones Just Got Banned Too
Antifa Protester to 9/11 Widow: 'Your Husband Should F***ing Rot In The Grave'
Trump On Migrant Caravan: "We Don't Want Them"
Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Christine Blasey Ford during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week, released a report on Sunday highlighting a massive list of inconsistencies in Ford's testimony.
"In the legal context, here is my bottom line," Mitchell said. "A 'he said, she said' case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that."
"Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them," Mitchell said. "For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard."
Here's the key points which you can also read in PDF format.
See the PDF for the timeline.
The fact of the matter is, one lie is enough to throw out a witness's testimony. Ford lied about her fear of flight to delay the hearings. She literally jet-sets around the world to surf and was flying all over the country in the last two months!
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab and Minds.