Watch Hillary Clinton Secretly Read From A Script During 'Live MSNBC Interview' With Chris Hayes

Re: Tax hit for Chris Hayes

agree

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Jake Sullivan <[email protected]
> wrote:

> This is good.
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Betsaida Alcantara <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> h/t to Mandy for edits.
>
>
>
> *SURCHARGE ON MILLIONAIRES*
>
>
> *Tell me about YOUR new tax proposal.*
>
> · As you know Chris, right now, the super-wealthy and big
> corporations use every trick in the book to game the system and avoid
> paying billions of dollars in taxes. It’s not right.
>
> · So today, I proposed adding a new “fair share surcharge” on
> multi-millionaires and closing loopholes to make it harder to game the
> system. (I’m also pushing for the Buffett Rule, which sets a minimum rate
> for those at the top, and other reforms like closing the carried interest
> loophole that allows some hedge fund managers to pay a lower rate than
> teachers or a nurses.)
>
>
>
> · I’m proposing every idea I can to finally make those at the top
> actually pay their fair share.
>
>
>
> · That’s going to be a big difference in this campaign. When you
> look at what the Republican candidates are proposing – it’s
> unbelievable. Trillions of dollars in new tax breaks to those at the
> top. Trickle down economics all over again.
>
>
>
> · On the Democratic side, I am the only candidate who has
> committed to raising middle class *incomes*, not middle class taxes.
>
>
>
> *How is this different from what other Democrats are proposing. They tax
> the rich too, right?*
>
>
>
> · Well, I am the only candidate who has proposed a surcharge on
> multimillionaires and the only one committed to NOT taxing the middle class.
>
>
>
> · Senator Sanders, Governor O’Malley, and I share a lot of the
> same values and goals. But we *do* have differences.
>
>
>
> · I’m a progressive who likes to get things done. I’ve laid out
> how I’m going to pay for everything I’m proposing.
>
>
>
> · I’m concerned that Senator Sanders has taken a different
> approach. His agenda would add 18 to 20 trillion dollars in new federal
> spending, but he hasn’t explained how he’d pay for it. That’s a big risk,
> because it’s hard to make the arithmetic add up any other way than a big
> tax increase on middle class families. I don’t think that’s the right
> choice .
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am fine on the substance but this seems a little long and a little hard
>> to say in conversation. Do I have a few minutes to edit for you?
>>
>> *Mandy Grunwald*
>> *Grunwald Communications*
>> *202 973-9400 <202%20973-9400>*
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>
>> To: Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>; John Podesta <
>> [email protected]>; Kristina Schake <[email protected]>;
>> Brian Fallon <[email protected]>; Robby Mook <
>> [email protected]>; Christina Reynolds <
>> [email protected]>; Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]>;
>> Betsaida Alcantara <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 4:03 pm
>> Subject: Re: Tax hit for Chris Hayes
>>
>> Should we add the 1.62 a week line Podesta suggested?
>>
>> Small thing but, I might say "he hasn't been able to show how he's gonna
>> pay for it" rather than explained because didn't they put out a whole chart
>> showing how they pay?
>>
>> Otherwise I'm good.
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is good.
>>
>> Plus Betsaida.
>>
>> *From:* Dan Schwerin [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2016 3:50 PM
>> *To:* John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jake Sullivan <
>> [email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri <
>> [email protected]>; Kristina Schake <
>> [email protected]>; Brian Fallon <[email protected]>;
>> Robby Mook <[email protected]>; Christina Reynolds <
>> [email protected]>; Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Tax hit for Chris Hayes
>>
>> HRC is going to call into Chris Hayes' show this afternoon to do her tax
>> hit. How does this look to you guys?
>>
>> · Right now, the super-wealthy and big corporations are using every
>> trick in the book to game the system and avoid paying billions in taxes.
>> It’s wrong, and it’s bad for our economy. We can’t have one tax system for
>> those at the top and another one for everyone else.
>>
>> · So today, I proposed adding a new “fair share surcharge” on
>> multi-millionaires and closing loopholes to make it harder to game the
>> system. I’m also pushing for the Buffett Rule, which sets a minimum rate
>> for those at the top, and other reforms like closing the carried interest
>> loophole that allows some hedge fund managers to pay a lower rate than a
>> teacher or a nurse.
>>
>> · When it comes to taxes, there’s a clear choice in this election.
>> Republicans candidates are promising huge new giveaways to the wealthiest
>> Americans. And on the Democratic side, I am the only candidate pledging to
>> raise middle class incomes, not middle class taxes.
>>
>> · You know, Senator Sanders, Governor O’Malley, and I share a lot
>> of the same values and goals. We both want to make the economy work for
>> everyone, not just those at the top. And the differences between us pale
>> compared to what we see on the other side. But we *do* have
>> differences.
>>
>> · I’m a progressive who likes to get things done. I measure every
>> policy by whether it’s going to actually make life better for working
>> families. And I’ve laid out how I’m going to pay for everything I’m
>> proposing by making the wealthy pay their fair share.
>>
>> · Senator Sanders has a different approach. His agenda would add
>> 18 to 20 trillion dollars in new federal spending, but he hasn’t explained
>> how he’d pay for it. That’s a big risk, because it’s hard to make the
>> arithmetic add up any other way than a big tax increase on middle class
>> families. I don’t think that’s the right choice when incomes for most
>> people have barely budged in years.
>>
>> · I like and respect Senator Sanders quite a lot, but I’m concerned
>> that some of his ideas run the risk of hurting rather than helping. So I
>> look forward to debating these differences in the campaign.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Betsaida Alcantara | Communications
> Hillary for America
>
>