informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Apr 30 2014, 2:28 AM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: InformationLiberation Print

CT Dems Seek to Deny Citizens' Right to Film Police

Chris | InformationLiberation

Under the guise of allowing people to film police, which is already entirely legal, Conneticut democrats are pushing a bill which would give police new powers to force citizens to stop filming.

From FOX CT:
State lawmakers are considering a bill focused on when and where the public can point a camera at scenes of police activity.

Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney is a co-sponsor of House Bill 5060, “An Act Concerning The Recording Of Police Activity By The Public.”

Sen. Looney said the bill will protect people who photograph how cops handle their jobs, but critics argued the exceptions in the proposal give police more authority to order people, including the press, to shut their cameras off.

Exceptions allow police to interpret when photography may interfere with their ability to enforce the law, protect public safety, preserve a crime scene and safeguard a person’s privacy.

“It actually authorizes the police in having you turn the camera off each and every time because the exceptions are so broad they swallow the rule,” Attorney Norm Pattis said.

“No responsible officer, operating reasonably in the performance of his duties, should have anything to fear from this bill, but anyone who is acting aggressively, bullying the public or behaving improperly should be worried,” Sen. Looney said.

Sen. Looney acknowledged that police and the chief state’s attorney were involved with drafting the exceptions in Bill 5060.


Cop everywhere already falsely claim citizens filming them is "interfering with their duties," which it should be noted is already a crime. There is absolutely no need for this bill, it's an underhanded backdoor attempt to enshrine in law the power for police to force citizens to stop filming.





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Quebec Woman Suing Cop Who Left Her Locked In Back Of Police Truck With Man Who Ended Up Raping Her
- Canada Unveils New Anti-Terrorism Bill That Moves for 'Unprecedented Expansion of Powers'
- Ex-Gf Of Seattle Cop Says She Smoked Pot Stolen From Evidence, Referred To Blacks As N*****s
- Police Label Hippy Group Whose Message Is "Peace & Love" 'Domestic Extremists'
- NYPD to Permanently Patrol Protests with Machine Guns
- New Mexico Grand Jury Finds Police Shooting Unjustified, DA Refuses to Prosecute
- Dash Cam Video Shows Seattle Cop Falsified Charge Against Elderly Man Walking Down Street
- Another Reason Uber Gets Banned: DUIs Are An Essential Revenue Stream









Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dougo

Posted: Apr 30 2014, 9:47 AM

Link
68107 the fact that some of these measures are even mentioned as a bill shows the contempt cops and politicians have for the general population.
Anonymous

Posted: May 01 2014, 12:23 AM

Link
67165 This is bullshit and senator Looney is a fucking asshole who needs to be killed before he turns into Hitler!!!


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Another Reason Uber Gets Banned: DUIs Are An Essential Revenue Stream - 01/29Video: Americans Want Obama to Repeal the Bill of Rights - 01/26Police Label Hippy Group Whose Message Is "Peace & Love" 'Domestic Extremists' - 01/30New Mexico Grand Jury Finds Police Shooting Unjustified, DA Refuses to Prosecute - 01/30Quebec Woman Suing Cop Who Left Her Locked In Back Of Police Truck With Man Who Ended Up Raping Her - 01/31Ex-Gf Of Seattle Cop Says She Smoked Pot Stolen From Evidence, Referred To Blacks As N*****s - 01/31Dash Cam Video Shows Seattle Cop Falsified Charge Against Elderly Man Walking Down Street - 01/29Canada Unveils New Anti-Terrorism Bill That Moves for 'Unprecedented Expansion of Powers' - 01/31

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top