DA Won’t Prosecute Former Judge On Rape ChargeBy Alex Goldsmith
Apr. 01, 2014
Photo Shows Harvey Weinstein Partying Together With Jeffrey Epstein And Ghislaine Maxwell
Rick Wilson Fantasizes About Putting Anti-Vaxxers in 'Re-Education Camps,' Seizing Their Kids & Property
IG Horowitz's Sham Report Says FBI Was Biased In Favor of Trump!
Trump Targets The Tyranny of 1.6 Gallons
First Muslim Woman Elected to PA House Charged With Stealing $500k From Charity
ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) – Three years ago, rape and witness intimidation charges brought down a prominent Albuquerque district court judge.
Wednesday, the district attorney in charge of handling that case says there isn’t enough evidence to move forward and that her office will not prosecute.
The case centered around Albert “Pat” Murdoch, the chief criminal district judge in 2011. He had served 26 years on the bench when a sudden arrest forced him to step down.
APD’s case against Murdoch started in July 2011 when vice detectives bought a DVD from prostitute Renae Padilla for $400.
According to a criminal complaint, Padilla told officers Murdoch had paid her for $200 sex acts at his home on eight separate occasions. Padilla claimed Murdoch performed oral sex on her against her will on two separate occasions, one of which she secretly recorded.
Albuquerque police arrested Murdoch the day after receiving that DVD on rape and witness intimidation charges. The latter charge was based on Padilla’s claims she posed hypothetical questions to Murdoch about what would happen if a woman made allegations against him. According to a criminal complaint, Murdoch told her “he would use the police and his connections to take care of the situation.”