informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 29 2014, 5:22 PM Category: Economy Source: LearnLiberty Print

Government Regulation: The Most Dangerous Monopoly




Everyone wants the items they buy to be safe to use or consume. Prof. Howard Baetjer of Towson University explains that when products undergo third-party certification processes to determine their safety, market forces are able to optimize the amount of testing conducted and consumers can use the information provided by certification firms to make their own decisions. It is difficult to say how much testing is enough: another test can always be run on a product, but at some point the benefit of the extra testing outweighs the costs. In a free-market system, competition among certification firms allows the market to work as it should and prevents both under- and over-testing of products. Conversely, when the government holds the monopoly on safety standards, products are likely to be over-tested, delaying their entry into the market and making them more expensive. Sometimes the costs of such delays cannot be quantified; lives can be lost while life-saving medicines are held up in safety-testing processes.

Check out Prof. Baetjer's book that inspired this video: http://www.freeourmarkets.com/book/

Animated by Tomasz Kaye: http://www.patreon.com/tomaszkaye





Latest Economy
- Are the Ruling Elites in China Now More Pro-market than the Ruling Elites in the USA?
- U.S. Government Debt Is Now at a Once-Unimaginable Level
- Ross Ulbricht, Martyr for Progress, and the Rise of Darkcoin
- Do We Need the State to License Professionals?
- How Government Helped Create the Coming Doctor Shortage
- Video: Obamacare Supporters Sign Petition to Extend Obamacare to Pets
- How Much Longer Can the U.S. Economy Bear the Burdens?
- Realtor: 'Paranoia' Driving Wealthy to Buy Homes in New Zealand









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 1:54 AM

Link
7147 How do I know if the third party testing firm does its job? As opposed to, say, simply taking a payment under the table from the manufacturer to give a good report on the manufacturer's crappy product?

The tester's reputation? Ha ha ha ha ha ha .... Look at the current relationships between investment firms ("manufacturers") and ratings firms ("testers"). Did the ratings firms' reputations matter enough to them to keep them from helping the investment firms screw private investors? Nope: Money talked and the investors just got screwed.

So the manufacturer and the tester laugh all the way to the bank, and I'm just screwed. This is better than government how? Because the fat-cat manufacturer saved testing money at my expense?

Whose side is the author on? Well, looks to me like he's on the side of fat-cat manufacturers; while individuals like me can just plan to be screwed. I see no basis for advantage in this process.
Chris

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 2:08 AM

Link
Because that would destroy their credibility and throw their entire business away. Government regulated rating agencies on the other hand do exactly as you describe, certified trash as AAA, screwing people over en masse, yet their businesses and government certifications are still intact.
Nickel's 2bits

Posted: Jan 30 2014, 4:17 AM

Link
7147 Individuals might worry about their personal reputation. The deceptions involved people who profited personally and handsomely for their cooperative lies. "If the investors lost money and my company's reputation is screwed, so what? I still got mine."

So maybe I didn't make my point clear: This article (and your statement) offer ZERO PROOF that things would be better without a government.

And if that also implies ZERO PROOF that government is better, so? I still want an incentive to go through the change, and this article provides none for me; only for the fat-cats who would steal my money.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Video of Man's Police Interaction Exposes Vast Conspiracy -- This is Why You Always Film Police - 02/26Man Falls Asleep On Bus, Cop Pummels And Pepper Sprays Him - 02/27Net Neutrality: Triumph of the Ruling Class - 02/27Feds Raid Texas Political Meeting; Fingerprint And Photograph All Attendees, Seize Phones - 02/27Wrong Man Jailed For Child Porn; Real Suspect Can't Be Charged - 02/27Minnesota Legislators, Law Enforcement Trying To Strip The 'Public Accountability' Out Of State's Body Camera Program - 02/27Senior Citizen Held at Gunpoint, Forced to Remove Clothes in Public, Jailed, for Driving Classic Car - 02/26Cop Assaults Man for Filming Brutality, Stomps Phone to Destroy Evidence Video Survived - 02/26

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top