NSA Surveillance Rarely Useful, Study ShowsNSA Programs Almost Never Used for Terror Probes
by Jason Ditz
Jan. 13, 2014
1.VIDEO: Crazed Feminists Harass Man For Filming "Whiteness History Month" Presentation
2.ADL Targets Trump: Saying "America First" is Anti-Semitic
3.WATCH: 'In the Name of the Profit' - Russia Exposes Turkey's 'Cozy Relations' With ISIS
4.Russians Blow Up Illegal Muslim Prayer Hall After Finding Explosives Inside
5.VIDEO: This Is What a Social Justice Warrior Looks Like
6.The Guardian Says Correcting People On Their Grammar Is Racist
7.'Violation of Sovereignty': Moscow Slams Obama Decision to Send 250 More US Troops to Syria
8.Hysterical Bloomberg Columnist: Trump's 'America First' Speech Reminiscent of 'Nazi Era'
A review of government claims by the New America Foundation has come to the conclusion that NSA chief Keith Alexander’s testimony as to the utility of NSA bulk surveillance was “overblown” and “misleading.”
The study showed that virtually all of the 225 terrorism investigations run by the US since 9/11 have centered on “traditional investigation methods.”
This was in keeping with similar findings from President Obama’s own review panel, which said the surveillance had been of little or no real benefit.
Incredibly though, the New America data suggests that not only was the NSA data not vital, it was rarely even used for terrorism investigations, with only 1.8% (2 out of 225) of investigations involving NSA bulk data collection in the first place.
The lack of even attempted uses of the NSA data for terrorism further underscores that the program itself was more about domestic mass surveillance for its own sake than some terrorism threat.