|

|
UC Davis Pepper Spray Cops Get Off Scot-FreeChris | InformationLiberation
 "We hereby find our enforcers not guilty," said the District Attorney.
Just joking, but that's essentially what just happened.
Via The Sacramento Bee:
The pepper-spraying of students by UC Davis police officers last November was not criminal conduct, Yolo County District Attorney's office concluded Wednesday following an inquiry into officers' response to protestors on the campus.
"(V)iewing the incident through the totality of the circumstances, there is insufficient evidence to establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the use of force involved in the November 18, 2011, pepper spraying was unlawful and therefore warrants the filing of criminal charges," officials said in a statement announcing the report's findings.
The response by campus police clad in riot gear last Nov. 18, punctuated by the image of police Lt. John Pike calmly pepper-spraying seated student protestors, was met with international scorn.
Pike was later relieved of duty; his police chief, Annette Spicuzza, resigned under fire; and withering reports from a specially-convened task force led by former state Supreme Court Justice Cruz Reynoso and independent consultant, Kroll, detailed a dysfunctional police department and "systematic and repeated failures" by university leaders. Fortunately, the pepper sprayed students at least won a settlement off the college, they report the college lost "more than $1 million in legal and other fees."
|
Latest Tyranny/Police State - Cop Caught Lying Gets Acquitted Of Assault - NC Cops Arrest Man Citing Nonexistent Warrant, Hold Him At Gunpoint, Rob His Home - Hofstra Student Andrea Rebello Shot in Head by Cop While Being Used as Human Shield During Home Invasion - Former Hero Officer Charged With Raping Women - Jailed for Remaining Silent? - LAPD Says Its Rehabilitation is Complete - Cop Stole Jewelry From Home He Was Dispatched To Check On - CA Police Chase of Pot Car Ends in Fatal Crash
|
FAIR USE NOTICE
|
|
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
|
|
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy |
|
|