NZ Police court order DotwrongNZ Herald NewsMar. 17, 2012 |
U.S. Must Prep to 'Welcome Large Numbers of Jewish Refugees,' Pro-War Lobbyist Mark Dubowitz Says
Israel Lobby Seeking to Revamp U.S. Aid as 'Partnership' Immune to Political Shifts
Ben Shapiro: The Israel Lobby Didn't Target Massie Because Of His Opposition to Israel
Israel Lobby Ousts Thomas Massie From Congress in Most Expensive Primary Race in History
Thomas Massie vs. The Israel Lobby
![]() Internet tycoon Kim Dotcom's cash, cars and property were seized using a court order which should never have been granted. A judgment from Justice Judith Potter on Friday declared the restraining order "null and void" and having "no legal effect". The blunder might now lead to the beleaguered internet mogul getting back everything that was stripped away in the surprise dawn raid on his mansion eight weeks ago. Police commissioner Peter Marshall and the Government's legal advisers at the Crown Law Office have admitted making an embarrassing "procedural error" when filing documents to seize Dotcom's property. Potter said Marshall's application for the restraining order had "confused" legal moves by opting for one in which Dotcom was not given a chance to mount a defence. It meant Marshall applied for the "incorrect order". Potter said he had sought to correct the mistake after the raid by applying for the proper order, retrospectively listing assets already seized. The new order had been granted on a temporary basis, but Potter said she would soon rule on whether the mistake meant the internet mogul should get his property back. Read More |