Police chiefs 'authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court'Senior police chiefs authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court to protect their cover as environmental protesters, it was claimed last night.By Andy Bloxham The Telegraph Oct. 29, 2011 |
'Sniper Seen on Roof Overlooking Pro-Palestine Protest' at Indiana University
Mike Johnson Pushes Debunked Lie That Israeli Babies Were 'Cooked in Ovens' On October 7
Axios Poll: Majority of Americans Now Want Mass Deportations
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
ADL Urged Congress to Pass FISA Law Spying on Americans to 'Protect Israel'
The claims led to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary delaying a report into undercover police tactics at the last minute. It had been due to be published today and was thought to be critical of the police. Lawyers for a convicted protester claim a Metropolitan Police officer called Jim Boyling, posing as an activist, was prosecuted alongside their client and lied under oath to conceal his true identity. Solicitors from the law firm Bindmans claim Boyling pretended to be Jim Sutton between 1995 and 2000 and joined the non-violent organisation Reclaim the Streets, the Guardian newspaper reported. As part of his role, Bindmans claim, he was prosecuted at Horseferry Road magistrates court in London in 1997 for disorderly behaviour in a three-day trial. He maintained his fiction during the entire prosecution, they allege, giving a false name and occupation and lying under oath. Read More |