Police chiefs 'authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court'Senior police chiefs authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court to protect their cover as environmental protesters, it was claimed last night.By Andy Bloxham The Telegraph Oct. 29, 2011 |
Rep. Thomas Massie: 'We Should End All U.S. Military Aid to Israel Now'
Three New Arrests in Killing of Infowars Journalist, Suspect Rapped About Murdering 'White Boy'
Ukraine Launches Drone Strike on Russian Airbases, U.S. Claims Ignorance of Attack Plan
Facebook/Instagram Restore Old Censorship Regime Following Shooting of Two Israeli Embassy Aides
Two 'Pro-Israel Voices' Among Dozens of NSC Officials Dismissed in 'Deep State' Purge
![]() The claims led to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary delaying a report into undercover police tactics at the last minute. It had been due to be published today and was thought to be critical of the police. Lawyers for a convicted protester claim a Metropolitan Police officer called Jim Boyling, posing as an activist, was prosecuted alongside their client and lied under oath to conceal his true identity. Solicitors from the law firm Bindmans claim Boyling pretended to be Jim Sutton between 1995 and 2000 and joined the non-violent organisation Reclaim the Streets, the Guardian newspaper reported. As part of his role, Bindmans claim, he was prosecuted at Horseferry Road magistrates court in London in 1997 for disorderly behaviour in a three-day trial. He maintained his fiction during the entire prosecution, they allege, giving a false name and occupation and lying under oath. Read More |