EPA Boosts Water Policing as Farmers Say Worst Fears RealizedBy Mark DrajemBloomberg Oct. 04, 2011 |
Trump Confronts South African President on White Genocide
Israeli PM Netanyahu: Trump Told Me 'I Have Absolute Commitment to You'
Trump, After Rearming Israel, 'Frustrated' With Netanyahu for Expanding War
CNN: U.S. Officials Say Israel Preparing Possible Strike on Iran
ADL Responds to DC Shooting With Call to Deplatform Twitch Streamer Hasan Piker
![]() Fifth-generation farmer Kenny Watkins ran afoul of the U.S. clean-water police in 2009. His infraction: Planting hay in a pasture. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ordered Watkins to stop cultivating a 160-acre (65-hectare) tract in central California because he might destroy seasonal ponds and harm the San Joaquin River. Watkins has defied the decision and the federal government’s control over what he can grow on his farm. His battle is cited by agriculture groups as they try to fend off a proposal by the Corps and the Environmental Protection Agency to enlarge the U.S. role in guarding waterways against contamination. The two agencies are reviewing a plan that would require permits under the Clean Water Act for work on wetlands or small channels that are usually dry. They say they’re clarifying authority they already have and critics say it’s a power grab. “Our worst fears are being realized,” Watkins, 48, said in an interview with Bloomberg Government, predicting his experience may be repeated on cropland across the country. “They keep coming up with more tools to use against us.” Farmers aren’t the only ones complaining. Homebuilders, railroad companies and steelmakers say the added bureaucracy would make them spend thousands of dollars seeking permits and increase costs. They would need to get U.S. approval to dig out new basements, repair bridges or dispose of waste, they say. Read More |