The (Not) Surprising Bloodthirstiness of the (Obamaphile) Leftby Daniel McAdams, LRC Blog
Oct. 01, 2011
Tucker: Psychiatric Drugs, Social Alienation, Broken Families, War On Men More Relevant Than Gun Control
Florida School Shooter IDed as 19-Yr-Old Nikolas Cruz
Swamp Drains Itself: Top GOP Donor Al Hoffman Jr. Says He Won't 'Write Another Check' Without Gun Ban
Chris Rock: 'I Want to Live in a World Where An Equal Amount of White Kids Are Shot Every Month - I Want to See White Mothers On TV Crying'
Student: There 'Had To Be Two Shooters' Because I Talked With Suspect Shortly After Shots Were Fired
It is funny (in a sick kind of way) to watch the Obamaphile left lashing out at Ron Paul's principled position against a president having the power to order the assassination of an American citizen without charges or trial. Click on any Obama-friendly site like the HuffingtonPost and you will see them machine-gunning the comments section with deep thoughts such as this:
"The right is just mad that Obama has done more to clean up the mess GWBYA left us, in 3 years than G did in 6. He has not been soft on terriorism as the right claimed he would be. As a matter of fact all of the things the right said about Obama have not come to pass.And this:
"The responsibility of the United States Government is to protect its citizen at home and abroad. Thank you Dept. of Justice...Thank you President Obama."And yet another gem from this embarrassment of riches (as a bonus, this one was from a "HUFFPOST SUPER USER." How super!):
"Anwar al Awaki was a sworn enemy of the United States and the free world in general. Have American citizenship should have no more relevance than killing a mass murderer within our borders. Al Awaki was a known mastermind in several terrorist plots and was also a known Al Qaida leader. President Obama was correct in taking him out just as with Osama bin Laden. GOP detractors are still smarting over the President's victory with killing the world's worst terrorist, Bin Laden. Just because Al Awaki could not be linked directly to a particular incident does not deminish his role instigating others to do these heinous acts."There you have it: just because no evidence could be offered, it should be enough that "everybody knows" he is a terrorist!
This is the same Left that convulsed in (justified) paroxysms when the Ashcroft Justice Department authorized torture.
We see today that, just as in the previous administration, the misnamed Justice Department was given the task to find a way to authorize this horrific injustice. According to today's news:
"The Justice Department wrote a secret memorandum authorizing the lethal targeting of Anwar al-Aulaqi, the American-born radical cleric who was killed by a U.S. drone strike Friday, according to administration officials.Of course, as Dr. Paul would point out, we are not "at war" at all. Not even the deeply-flawed, open-ended H J Res 64 in 2001 which authorized retaliation against those who planned the attacks of Sept. 11 would have applied to Anwar al-Aulaqi, who was not implicated in those attacks.
If this assassination of an American is legal because "we are at war, we have always been at war," to paraphrase the great Eric Arthur Blair, then the word "legal" no longer has any meaning.
At these times I reflect on the yearly State Department Human Rights Report, where the US government takes it upon itself to judge the freedom or tyranny of the rest of the world. A key factor in determining whether a foreign regime is lawless and tyrannical? Engaging in extrajudicial killings!
As a dear friend wrote me yesterday, "Even St. Paul got a trial after announcing he was a Roman citizen... It meant something to be a Roman, not so much an American apparently."