The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC Blog
Jul. 20, 2011
Poll: 59% Of Democrats Believe Russia Changed Vote Tallies To Elect Trump
Sweden: 70yo Woman Prosecuted For Complaining About Migrants Defecating In The Streets
CNN: Manchester Bombing May Be 'Right-Wing False Flag'
Liberal Guardian Journalist Interferes In Montana Election, Gets Body Slammed
'People Could Go To Jail': OAN Reports WH Leakers Identified, Trump Set To Fire Three Staffers
It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be.