The Lying Prosecution in the Casey Anthony Trialby Anthony Gregory, LRC Blog
Jul. 20, 2011
Sweden: Police Suspect Grenade Used in Recent Attack
Previously Deported Illegal Goes On Murderous Rampage Days After CT Gov Refused To Work With ICE
Report: Kushner, Ivanka Stripped Anti-Climate Change Executive Order, Plot To Push Global Warming
Sweden's Migrant Crime Wave Becomes Top National Story As Media's Lies Backfire
'Trump Was Right': Migrants Riot, Loot, Fight With Police And Set Cars On Fire In Sweden
It stressed more than once that Casey Anthony had repeatedly searched for chloroform on the internet, proving her intention to commit murder. An expert, one of the prosecution's very own witnesses, came forward and told the prosecution their assertion was based on faulty data. The state, of course, withheld this fact and refused to correct the record. Despite this the jury realized that the prosecution had failed to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Surely, had the jury found the other way, it would be an illegitimate trial. Since the jurors followed the law and voted not guilty, the prosecution will likely not be held accountable for its misconduct the way it should be.