informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jul 04 2011, 3:21 PM Category: History Source: Gary North Print

Tricked on the Fourth of July

by Gary North

I do not celebrate the fourth of July. This goes back to a term paper I wrote in graduate school. It was on colonial taxation in the British North American colonies in 1775. Not counting local taxation, I discovered that the total burden of British imperial taxation was about 1% of national income. It may have been as high as 2.5% in the southern colonies.

In 2008, Alvin Rabushka's book of almost 1,000 pages appeared: Taxation in Colonial America (Princeton University Press). In a review published in the Business History Review, the reviewer summarizes the book's findings.
Rabushka's most original and impressive contribution is his measurement of tax rates and tax burdens. However, his estimate of comparative trans-Atlantic tax burdens may be a bit of moving target. At one point, he concludes that, in the period from 1764 to 1775, "the nearly two million white colonists in America paid on the order of about 1 percent of the annual taxes levied on the roughly 8.5 million residents of Britain, or one twenty-fifth, in per capita terms, not taking into account the higher average income and consumption in the colonies" (p. 729). Later, he writes that, on the eve of the Revolution, "British tax burdens were ten or more times heavier than those in the colonies" (p. 867). Other scholars may want to refine his estimates, based on other archival sources, different treatment of technical issues such as the adjustment of intercolonial and trans-Atlantic comparisons for exchange rates, or new estimates of comparative income and wealth. Nonetheless, no one is likely to challenge his most important finding: the huge tax gap between the American periphery and the core of the British Empire.
The colonists had a sweet deal in 1775. Great Britain was the second freest nation on earth. Switzerland was probably the most free nation, but I would be hard-pressed to identify any other nation in 1775 that was ahead of Great Britain. And in Great Britain's Empire, the colonists were by far the freest.

I will say it, loud and clear: the freest society on earth in 1775 was British North America, with the exception of the slave system. Anyone who was not a slave had incomparable freedom.

Jefferson wrote these words in the Declaration of Independence:
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
I can think of no more misleading political assessment uttered by any leader in the history of the United States. No words having such great impact historically in this nation were less true. No political bogeymen invoked by any political sect as "the liar of the century" ever said anything as verifiably false as these words.

The Continental Congress declared independence on July 2, 1776. Some members signed the Declaration on July 4. The public in general believed the leaders at the Continental Congress. They did not understand what they were about to give up. They could not see what price in blood and treasure and debt they would soon pay. And they did not foresee the tax burden in the new nation after 1783.

In an article on taxation in that era, Rabushka gets to the point.
Historians have written that taxes in the new American nation rose and remained considerably higher, perhaps three times higher, than they were under British rule. More money was required for national defense than previously needed to defend the frontier from Indians and the French, and the new nation faced other expenses.
So, as a result of the American Revolution, the tax burden tripled.

The debt burden soared as soon as the Revolution began. Monetary inflation wiped out the currency system. Price controls in 1777 produced the debacle of Valley Forge. Percy Greaves, a disciple of Ludwig von Mises and for 17 years an attendee at his seminar, wrote this in 1972.
Our Continental Congress first authorized the printing of Continental notes in 1775. The Congress was warned against printing more and more of them. In a 1776 pamphlet, Pelatiah Webster, America's first economist, told his fellow men that Continental currency might soon become worthless unless something was done to curb the further printing and issuance of this paper money.

The people and the Congress refused to listen to his wise advice. With more and more paper money in circulation, consumers kept bidding up prices. Pork rose from 4¢ to 8¢ a pound. Beef soared from about 4¢ to 100 a pound. As one historian tells us, "By November, 1777, commodity prices were 480% above the prewar average."

The situation became so bad in Pennsylvania that the people and legislature of this state decided to try "a period of price control, limited to domestic commodities essential for the use of the army." It was thought that this would reduce the cost of feeding and supplying our Continental Army. It was expected to reduce the burden of war.

The prices of uncontrolled, imported goods then went sky high, and it was almost impossible to buy any of the domestic commodities needed for the Army. The controls were quite arbitrary. Many farmers refused to sell their goods at the prescribed prices. Few would take the paper Continentals. Some, with large families to feed and clothe, sold their farm products stealthily to the British in return for gold. For it was only with gold that they could buy the necessities of life which they could not produce for themselves.

On December 5, 1777, the Army's Quartermaster-General, refusing to pay more than the government-set prices, issued a statement from his Reading, Pennsylvania headquarters saying, "If the farmers do not like the prices allowed them for this produce let them choose men of more learning and understanding the next election."

This was the winter of Valley Forge, the very nadir of American history. On December 23, 1777, George Washington wrote to the President of the Congress, "that, notwithstanding it is a standing order, and often repeated, that the troops shall always have two days' provisions by them, that they might be ready at any sudden call; yet an opportunity has scarcely ever offered, of taking an advantage of the enemy, that has not been either totally obstructed, or greatly impeded, on this account…. we have no less than two thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight men now in camp unfit for duty, because they are barefoot and otherwise naked…. I am now convinced beyond a doubt, that, unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place, this army must inevitably be reduced to one or other of these three things: starve, dissolve, or disperse in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can."
Only after the price control law was repealed in 1778 could the army buy goods again. But the hyperinflation of the continentals and state-issued currencies replaced the pre-Revolution system of silver currency: Spanish pieces of eight.

The proponents of independence invoked British tyranny in North America. There was no British tyranny, and surely not in North America.

In 1872, Frederick Engels wrote an article, "On Authority." He criticized anarchists, whom he called anti-authoritarians. His description of the authoritarian character of all armed revolutions should remind us of the costs of revolution.
A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon – authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists.
After the American Revolution, 46,000 American loyalists fled to Canada. They were not willing to swear allegiance to the new colonial governments. The retained their loyalty to the nation that had delivered to them the greatest liberty on earth. They had not committed treason.

The revolutionaries are not remembered as treasonous. John Harrington told us why sometime around 1600. "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

The victors write the history books.

What would libertarians – even conservatives – give today in order to return to an era in which the central government extracted 1% of the nation's wealth? Where there was no income tax?

Would they describe such a society as tyrannical?

That the largest signature on the Declaration of Independence was signed by the richest smuggler in North America was no coincidence. He was hopping mad. Parliament in 1773 had cut the tax on tea imported by the British East India Company, so the cost of British tea went lower than the smugglers' cost on non-British tea. This had cost Hancock a pretty penny. The Tea Party had stopped the unloading of the tea by throwing privately owned tea off a privately owned ship – a ship in competition with Hancock's ships. The Boston Tea Party was in fact a well-organized protest against lower prices stemming from lower taxes.

So, once again, I shall not celebrate the fourth of July.
__
Gary North [send him mail] is the author of Mises on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com. He is also the author of a free 20-volume series, An Economic Commentary on the Bible.

Copyright © 2011 Gary North





Latest History
- The US Air Force Almost Nuked North Carolina
- Gun Control in Nazi Germany
- Obama's Former Foreign Policy Adviser Said -- In 1997 -- that the U.S. Had to Gain Control of Ukraine
- Tom DiLorenzo on John Stewart and His Lying Lincolnians
- 100 Years of War Lies DEBUNKED
- Stalin Apologia
- Molyneux: The Truth About Nelson Mandela
- A Brewing Terror: The U.S. Government's Alcohol Poisoning Program









Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Keudo

Posted: Jul 05 2011, 10:37 AM

Link
70178 Except it wasn't the taxation that irked the colonists, it was the taxation with no representation. The colonists had no say in how they would be governed, allowed to expand, restricted, etc. There were representatives in Parliament for the colonies, but these representatives were not from the colonies, and had no actual interest in their way of life.

Taxes alone are a rather bad thing to base a paper about this subject on. While personal freedoms abounded (except the right to pick your own religion, the right to speak out against the government without fear of reprisal - since it was a crime to speak against the king). The tax situation alone was a subject of very little debate or issue. Parliament insisted it had the right to levy any tax without colonial approval, to demonstrate that it had authority over the colonies, which is a very clear act of tyranny and oppression. Among other things, which would include being forced to quarter British troops without consent, and the allowance for these troops to take anything they wanted from their homes.

You seem to want to focus on a single, small thing, one which actually had very little impact in the desire to declare independence from the British Empire.

I like reading what I find on this site, most of the time, but every so often I find something like this, where a viewpoint seems exceedingly misinformed and is formed in extreme, willful ignorance.
Anonymous

Posted: Jul 05 2011, 12:34 PM

Link
6740 Do not forget about the trade also. Where the crown said that the colonies could only trade with Briton. That is a cause that gets overlooked to much.
British empire apologists

Posted: Jul 06 2011, 1:51 AM

Link
17363 Just another try, but thanks for playing! Yes Adam smith, John Locke, the Mill bros. Etc.. All employed by the east India co. With a standing army of 200,000? Grabbing African slaves to the Americas, causing THOUSANDS of famines in India, subjecting China into opium through bombardment and so on.
As in the Colonies case, there would be no way we would be communicating through these forms of mediums like Internet if we were still under British Empire, forget about freedom of speech but the actual infrastructure would be suppressed, just the way the colonists could not have iron development nor steel nor any type of manufacturing!
Hence, there was a sense of productive society that our forefathers had and acted on.
The whole idea of free trade which existed before U.S. Was an apology by Adam Smith where as the original American system was created to raise tariffs to encourage industries to develop rather than be subjected to slave made British goods from abroad a natural monopoly.
So why not just move to London or Wall street and get your Arse out of the land of the free!
Gary Fielder

Posted: Jul 06 2011, 10:00 AM

Link
703 This is the most ridiculous article Gary North, or for that matter, anyone has ever written.

Just imagine the world today without the Revolution. I know we are still controlled by the Crown, but the extent of our own slavery would be 20 times worse.

Our relatives fought in the Revolution.

On behalf of those People, I would proudly like to tell Mr. North to go fuck himself.

He called Thomas Jefferson a liar.

Fuck you, Gary North. I used to like you. You better hope I dont ever see you in person. I will of course not touch you, but I bet you leave the room when I exercise my 1st Amendment right to tell you how I feel about your stupid and insulting article.

Oh, the Revolution was started by business men. Boo who. Oh, some of them owned slaves. Oh, no.

I cant believe what I'm hearing from so-called Libertarians! That means the Party of Liberty. What liberty!?

Gary North wants us to be subjects. He would prefer being a subject. Or maybe he thinks he would be a noble, and not have to worry about being subject to a Monarchy.

Unbelievable article. Maybe next year he will apologize and set off some fireworks. I'll be waiting for that article, Mr. North.

Orbis Unum

Posted: Sep 26 2011, 4:07 PM

Link
6540 Whether one chooses to like any historical introspection or otherwise, shall rest upon their own ideological conditioning each may allow themselves to be subjected to for whatever reasons.

I myself, have striven to peel away the social programming simply because organically speaking, the laudable terms for which we're taught in the Centers of Education, appertaining to either the exercise of Liberty or Freedom, are very limited once you reverse engineer such social programming.

For those capable of earnestly exercising the Science of Right Reason, and, choosing to avail themselves of the enlightenment garnered therefrom (which comes about via reverse engineering), we proffer to whomever may be concerned or capable of listening or reading respectfully, as it appertains to the truth of the matter related thereto, the reality of what each of us are taught by various social Role Models, as it applies to why anyone should pay taxes and/or should be willing to die for these ideologies associated with Liberty or Freedom and the exercise thereof, whether in the Western Hemisphere or otherwise, historically or presently speaking!

In reference, to the above aforementioned, I proffer for whomsoever, such edification and further enlightenment any may garner from the following web link for their consideration respective to such subject matters aforementioned: http://www.seagov.net/.
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

By the Numbers: How Dangerous Is It to Be a Cop? - 08/21Man Picks Up Toy Gun At Walmart, Cops Shoot Him - 08/07Taxfeeding Cop Threatens Shooting Spree Over Other People Receiving Welfare - 08/07Citizen Pursues a Cop For Speeding. When the Cop Sees The Camera, Magic Happens - 08/07FL Cops Shoot At Man Carrying Unloaded Gun, Kill Innocent College Student With Stray Bullet - 08/22Turning America Into a War Zone, Where 'We the People' Are the Enemy - 08/21Army to Continue 'Black Helicopter' Training Over Twin Cities Despite Anger - 08/21Student Suspended For Saying 'Bless You' After Classmate Sneezed - 08/21

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top