Defending The Indefensible: Lawyers Who Love Loopholes Ignoring Serious Constitutional Issues In Domain SeizuresTechdirtMar. 23, 2011 |
Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard Push for Nuking Iran
Trump Appears to Surrender Strait of Hormuz to Iran, Tells Allies to 'Go Get Your Own Oil'
Trump Says U.S. Sent 'A Lot of Guns' to Iranian 'Protesters'
Trump Threatens Iran With Genocide If They Won't Meet His Demands: 'A Whole Civilization Will Die Tonight'
Reuters: Trump Approved Iran Strikes After Speaking With Netanyahu
![]() One of the really sickening things in the debate over the seizures of domains by the US government without due process and with no regard to prior restraint is the way some pro-copyright lawyers have tried to wave off these rather significant concerns, highlighted by multiple lawyers, by focusing on quoting cases out of context and searching for legal loopholes to justify the seizures. Of course, if you dig into the actual case law, you find that the legal loopholes they highlight don't actually apply in this situation. Read More |